scholarly journals Role of Visual Speech in Phonological Processing by Children With Hearing Loss

2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 412-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Jerger ◽  
Nancy Tye-Murray ◽  
Hervé Abdi
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Phonological Processing ◽  
Visual Speech ◽  
Children With Hearing Loss

Professionals’ Perspectives on Supporting Deaf Multilingual Learners and Their Families

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-84
Author(s):  
Kathryn Crowe ◽  
Mark Guiberson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Phenomenological Study ◽  
Language Choice ◽  
Language Management ◽  
Knowledge Resources ◽  
Raising Children ◽  
Children With Hearing Loss ◽  
Insight Into

Abstract Parents frequently report that advice from professionals is important in making decisions about how their child with hearing loss will communicate. Little is currently known about how professionals support parents raising children with hearing loss in spoken language multilingual environments, children who are described as d/Deaf multilingual learners (DMLs). The purpose of this phenomenological study was to gain insight into professionals’ perspectives and experiences working with such families, particularly in relation to supporting parents in decision-making about multilingualism and language choice. Nineteen professionals discussed their experiences working with DMLs and their families, the role of professionals in decision-making about multilingualism and language choice, and the factors that they considered were important when supporting DMLs and their families. Inductive thematic analysis yielded three themes: child characteristics (language, development), negotiating and supporting language (information, parents’ language, role of language, timing, leadership, language management), and professional issues (knowledge, resources). This paper provides an important insight into professional considerations in supporting DMLs and their families, such as the role and functioning of evidence-based practice.

Vocabulary development in children with hearing loss: The role of child, family, and educational variables

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karien M. Coppens ◽  
Agnes Tellings ◽  
William van der Veld ◽  
Robert Schreuder ◽  
Ludo Verhoeven
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Vocabulary Development ◽  
Children With Hearing Loss ◽  
Educational Variables

Listening, Language, and Literacy Development and Children With Hearing Loss Who are Learning Spoken Language

2020 ◽  
pp. 36-51
Author(s):  
Lyn Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Literary Criticism ◽  
Meaning Making ◽  
Spoken Language ◽  
Language And Literacy ◽  
Symbol Systems ◽  
Thinking Processes ◽  
Children With Hearing Loss ◽  
The Individual

This chapter explores the acquisition of spoken language and literacy in children with hearing loss whose auditory access through the use of hearing technology enables them to listen, and it examines the relationships among language, thought, and print that offer explanation of the role of spoken language as the foundation for literacy. It defines reading and writing as thinking processes that make use of symbol systems representative of spoken language and gives attention to the numerous cueing systems and conventions comprising representations of meaning. Drawing from cognitive psychology, linguistics, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, literary criticism, and critical traditions developed over time through study of people with typical hearing, this chapter argues that meaning making resides in the individual in the presence of symbols both heard and seen and for maximizing spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss so as to prepare them for lifelong literacy and language use.

scholarly journals The Devil in the Details Can Be Hard to Spot: Malapropisms and Children With Hearing Loss

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Joanna H. Lowenstein ◽  
Susan Nittrouer
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Phonological Awareness ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Phonological Processing ◽  
Speech Signal ◽  
Word Reading ◽  
Verbal Working Memory ◽  
Academic Competence ◽  
Vocabulary Knowledge ◽  
Children With Hearing Loss

Purpose Better auditory prostheses and earlier interventions have led to remarkable improvements in spoken language abilities for children with hearing loss (HL), but these children often still struggle academically. This study tested a hypothesis for why this may be, proposing that the language of school becomes increasingly disconnected from everyday discourse, requiring greater reliance on bottom-up phonological structure, and children with HL have difficulty recovering that structure from the speech signal. Participants One hundred nineteen fourth graders participated: 48 with normal hearing (NH), 19 with moderate losses who used hearing aids (HAs), and 52 with severe-to-profound losses who used cochlear implants (CIs). Method Three analyses were conducted. #1: Sentences with malapropisms were created, and children's abilities to recognize them were assessed. #2: Factors contributing to those abilities were evaluated, including phonological awareness, phonological processing, vocabulary, verbal working memory, and oral narratives. #3: Teachers' ratings of students' academic competence were obtained, and factors accounting for those ratings were evaluated, including the five listed above, along with word reading and reading comprehension. Results #1: Children with HAs and CIs performed more poorly on malapropism recognition than children with NH, but similarly to each other. #2: All children with HL demonstrated large phonological deficits, but they were especially large for children with CIs. Phonological awareness explained the most variance in malapropism recognition for children with CIs. Vocabulary knowledge explained malapropism recognition for children with NH or HAs, but other factors also contributed. #3: Teachers rated academic competence for children with CIs more poorly than for children with NH or HAs, and variance in those ratings for children with CIs were primarily explained by malapropism scores. Conclusion Children with HL have difficulty recognizing acoustic–phonetic detail in the speech signal, and that constrains their abilities to follow conversations in academic settings, especially if HL is severe enough to require CIs. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13133018

Impact of Meeting Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Benchmarks on Spoken Language

2021 ◽  
pp. 105381512110252
Author(s):  
Brittany Grey ◽  
Elizabeth K. Deutchki ◽  
Emily A. Lund ◽  
Krystal L. Werfel
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Early Intervention ◽  
Spoken Language ◽  
Language Outcomes ◽  
Number Of Children ◽  
Predictive Role ◽  
Outcomes For Children ◽  
Children With Hearing Loss ◽  
Unique Predictor

This study compared preschool spoken language outcomes for children with hearing loss who met the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) guidelines to those who did not, as well as compared outcomes for those who met the current EHDI guidelines to those who met the earlier benchmarks. Finally, the predictive role of meeting each component of the guidelines was evaluated relative to language outcomes. Children who met the EHDI guidelines had higher language scores than those who did not; however, there was no difference between children who met the current guidelines and those who met the earlier benchmarks. Entering early intervention by 6 months of age was the only unique predictor of spoken language outcomes. The findings suggest that EHDI programs should target increasing the number of children with hearing loss who meet the current 1-3-6 benchmarks with a particular focus on enrollment in early intervention by 6 months.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document