Success Strategies: Implementing the Professional Performance Review Process for School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-9
Author(s):  
Jill Parmenter ◽  
Sheryl Amaral ◽  
Julia Jackson

Abstract The Professional Performance Review Process for School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists (PPRP) (ASHA, 2006) was developed in response to the need for a performance review tool that fits school district requirements for performance review management while addressing the specific roles and responsibilities of a school-based speech-language pathologist (ASHA, 2006). This article will examine the purpose and components of the PPRP. A description of its use as a tool for self-advocacy will be discussed. Strategies for successful implementation of the PPRP will be explained using insight from speech-language pathologists and other professionals familiar with the PPRP.

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 78-81
Author(s):  
Patricia (Trici) Schraeder

Abstract The Professional Performance Review Process (PPRP) was designed specifically for the school-based speech-language pathologist and enhances the four major purposes of professional performance review that have been identified in educational literature. The PPRP combines a formative self-reflection tool (including workload analysis) with a summative evaluation process.


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11
Author(s):  
Janet Deppe ◽  
Marie Ireland

This paper will provide the school-based speech-language pathologist (SLP) with an overview of the federal requirements for Medicaid, including provider qualifications, “under the direction of” rule, medical necessity, and covered services. Billing, documentation, and reimbursement issues at the state level will be examined. A summary of the findings of the Office of Inspector General audits of state Medicaid plans is included as well as what SLPs need to do in order to ensure that services are delivered appropriately. Emerging trends and advocacy tools will complete the primer on Medicaid services in school settings.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 134-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Drazinski

When school-based speech-language pathologists encounter executive dysfunction, it is typically related to a developmental issue and is often associated with other diagnoses. There are students, however, who present with acquired executive function that is neurogenic in basis. These may present as very different disorders, yet there are commonalities between the two etiologies of executive dysfunction. This article presents some common principles of intervention for consideration by the school-based speech-language pathologist.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyndsey Pollack Zurawski

Changing service delivery models can be difficult for a variety of reasons. The expanding roles and responsibilities of school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs) along with the implementation of Common Core State Standards (CCSS) only create more pressure. Implementation of the CCSS does not have to be an anxiety driven task. School-based SLPs can accept the challenge of providing inclusive-based services to meet the diverse needs of the SLPs caseload while providing educationally relevant services.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 145-148
Author(s):  
Jill Parmenter ◽  
Paula McGraw

Abstract Mentoring is one of the most important services experienced speech-language pathologists can provide to the profession of speech-language pathology. The mentoring we provide today will impact the future of the profession. This article will examine the roles and responsibilities of a mentoring speech-language pathologist, considering the specific needs of a Clinical Fellow (CF) as well as the mentoring needed for professionals throughout their careers.


2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Losardo ◽  
Angela Notari-Syverson ◽  
Thalia Coleman ◽  
Dawn C. Botts

Abstract Speech-language pathologists are faced with an increasing demand to conduct language and literacy assessments for children who are from cultures different from their own. Cross-cultural assessment is challenging. This article outlines the conditions necessary for successful implementation of culturally appropriate models of assessment. Alternative approaches to assessment are proposed that will guide speech-language pathologists about where, when, and how to assess children. Embedded approaches, authentic approaches, mediated approaches, and comprehensive models offer the speech-language pathologist the option of using assessment activities which can be adapted to match the needs of the child being assessed. And finally, ideas for family-professional collaboration in the assessment of young children's language and literacy development are provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document