Instrumental Assessment in Cleft Palate Care

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Perry ◽  
Graham Schenck
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
New Developments ◽  
Perceptual Evaluation ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Instrumental Assessment ◽  
Speech Language Pathologist ◽  
Hypernasal Speech ◽  
Perceptual Assessment ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function ◽  
And Function

Despite advances in surgical management, it is estimated that 20–30% of children with repaired cleft palate will continue to have hypernasal speech and require a second surgery to create normal velopharyngeal function (Bricknell, McFadden, & Curran, 2002; Härtel, Karsten, & Gundlach, 1994; McWilliams, 1990). A qualitative perceptual assessment by a speech-language pathologist is considered the most important step of the evaluation for children with resonance disorders (Peterson-Falzone, Hardin-Jones, & Karnell, 2010). Direct and indirect instrumental analyses should be used to confirm or validate the perceptual evaluation of an experienced speech-language pathologist (Paal, Reulbach, Strobel-Schwarthoff, Nkenke, & Schuster, 2005). The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of current instrumental assessment methods used in cleft palate care. Both direct and indirect instrumental procedures will be reviewed with descriptions of the advantages and disadvantages of each. Lastly, new developments for evaluating velopharyngeal structures and function will be provided.

Current Practice in Assessing and Reporting Speech Outcomes of Cleft Palate and Velopharyngeal Surgery: A Survey of Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Professionals

2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann W. Kummer ◽  
Stacey L. Clark ◽  
Erin E. Redle ◽  
Leisa L. Thomsen ◽  
David A. Billmire
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Rating Scales ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Surgical Success ◽  
Perceptual Evaluation ◽  
Speech Language Pathologist ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Normal Speech

Objective To determine methods by which professionals serving cleft palate/craniofacial teams are evaluating velopharyngeal function and to ascertain what they consider as a successful speech outcome of surgery. Design A 12-question survey was developed for professionals involved in management of velopharyngeal dysfunction. Participants The survey was distributed through E-mail lists for the American Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Association and Division 5 of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Only speech-language pathologists and surgeons were asked to complete the survey. A total of 126 questionnaires were completed online. Results Standard speech evaluations include perceptual evaluation (99.2%), intraoral examination (96.8%), nasopharyngoscopy (59.3%), nasometry (28.9%), videofluoroscopy (19.2%), and aerodynamic measures (4.3%). Significant variation existed in the types and levels of perceptual rating scales. Pharyngeal flap (52.9%) is the most commonly performed procedure for velopharyngeal insufficiency, followed by sphincter pharyngoplasty (27.5%). Criteria for surgical success included normal speech (50.8%), acceptable speech (27.9%), and “improved” speech (8%). However, most respondents felt that success should be defined as normal speech (71.2%). Most respondents believed that surgical success should be determined by the team speech-language pathologist (81.5%); although, some felt success should be determined by the patient/family (17.7%). Conclusion This survey shows considerable variability in the methods for evaluating and reporting speech outcomes following surgery. There is inconsistency in what is considered a successful surgical outcome, making comparison studies impossible. Most respondents thought that success should be defined as normal speech, but this is not happening in current practice.

Survey of Services and Practices of Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Teams

1992 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Pannbacker ◽  
Norman J. Lass ◽  
Jane F. Scheuerle ◽  
Phylisa J. English
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Oral Examination ◽  
Questionnaire Data ◽  
Instrumental Assessment ◽  
Perceptual Assessment ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function

Questionnaire data about services and practices of cleft palate-craniofacial teams were obtained from 63 teams in 35 states. Findings indicate the following: (1) research was the least frequently conducted activity, although 73 percent of the teams Indicated that they conducted research; and (2) the majority of those responding regarded cinefluoroscopy, endoscopy, perceptual assessment, oral examination, and videoendoscopy as important procedures, yet most patients (90%) seen by these teams did not receive instrumental assessment of velopharyngeal function.

Perceptual Evaluation of Speech and Velopharyngeal Function in Children with and without Cleft Palate and the Relationship to Nasal Airflow Patterns

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Dotevall ◽  
Anette Lohmander-Agerskov ◽  
Hasse Ejnell ◽  
Björn Bake
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Airflow Rate ◽  
Nasal Airflow ◽  
Perceptual Evaluation ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function ◽  
The Relationship

Objectives The aim was to study the relationship between perceptual evaluation of speech variables related to velopharyngeal function and the pattern of nasal airflow during the velopharyngeal closing phase in speech in children with and without cleft palate. Participants Fourteen children with cleft lip and palate or cleft palate only and 15 controls aged 7 and 10 years. All were native Swedish speakers. Method Three experienced listeners performed a blinded perceptual speech evaluation. Nasal airflow was transduced with a pneumotachograph attached to a nasal mask. The duration from peak to 5% nasal airflow, maximum flow declination rate, and nasal airflow at selected points in time during the transition from nasal to stop consonants in bilabial and velar articulatory positions in sentences were estimated. The analysis was focused on the perceptual ratings of “velopharyngeal function” and “hypernasality.” Results A strong association was found between ratings of “velopharyngeal function” and “hypernasality” and the pattern of nasal airflow during the bilabial nasal-to-stop combination /mp/. Both the sensitivity and specificity were 1.00 for the bilabial temporal airflow measure in relation to ratings of “velopharyngeal function.” The nasal airflow rate during /p/ in /mp/ had a sensitivity of 1.00 and specificity of 0.92 to 0.96 in relation to ratings of “hypernasality.” Conclusion Assessment of the nasal airflow dynamics during the velopharyngeal closing phase in speech presents quantitative, objective data that appear to distinguish between perceptually normal and deviant velopharyngeal function with high sensitivity and specificity.

Comparing Quality of Life and Perceptual Speech Ratings in Children With Cleft Palate

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562094943
Author(s):  
Hailey M. Pedersen ◽  
Paige A. Goodie ◽  
Maia N. Braden ◽  
Susan L. Thibeault
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Life Outcomes ◽  
Speech Language Pathologist ◽  
Perceptual Characteristics ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function

Objective: To delineate the relationship between patient and parent-reported quality of life (QOL) ratings and perceptual characteristics of speech assigned by a speech-language pathologist (SLP) in children with repaired cleft palate. Design: Prospective. Setting: Academic Children’s Hospital. Participants: This population-based sample included children, aged 3 to 18 with a history of repaired cleft palate, and their parents. Intervention: Participants completed the Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Effects on Life Outcomes Questionnaire (VELO). Children’s speech was judged perceptually by an expert SLP using the Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale (PWSS). Main Outcome Measure(s): Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Effects on Life Outcomes questionnaire assessed participant and parent perceptions of impact of velopharyngeal function on QOL. Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale assessed nasal emissions, facial grimacing, nasality, quality of phonation, and articulation. Results: Enrollment included 48 participant parent dyads. Overall, participants reported high QOL scores within the 95% CI with children reporting slightly better yet not significantly different QOL (86.27 ± 8.96) compared to their parents (81.81 ± 15.2). Children received an average score of 1.38 ± 1.96 on the PWSS corresponding to borderline velopharyngeal competence. A significant moderate negative correlation was found between PWSS total score and parent VELO total score (r = −0.51103, P = .0002). Mild–moderate significant negative correlations were measured between PWSS total and the 5 subscales of the VELO. No significant correlations were measured between PWSS and child VELO total responses or between total scores and subscales. Conclusions: Results suggest that as perceptual analysis of speech improves, overall QOL improves moderately.

Results of a Survey of Cleft Palate Teams concerning the Use of Nasendoscopy

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda L. D'antonio ◽  
Bruce M. Achauer ◽  
Victoria M. Vander Kam
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Research Tool ◽  
Clinical Tool ◽  
Perceptual Evaluation ◽  
Diagnostic Problems ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function ◽  
Endoscopic Assessment

A national survey was conducted concerning methods used for the evaluation of velopharyngeal function with emphasis on the role of nasendoscopy. Forty-five percent of questionnaires were returned. Ninety percent of the responding teams indicated that nasendoscopy was available. Sixty-one percent agreed that endoscopy was an important clinical tool and not solely a research tool. The majority (59%) considered 3 to 5 years of age to be the youngest, appropriate age for referral. Ninety percent agreed that nasendoscopy was indicated for difficult diagnostic problems and 41% reported endoscopic studies were appropriate for all patients for whom secondary palatal management is planned. The results of this survey suggest that endoscopic assessment of velopharyngeal function is used routinely as an adjunct to the perceptual evaluation of speech and has become the standard of care among cleft palate teams for difficult diagnostic cases. However, the data also indicate that increased availability does not necessarily assure optimal use.

The Basics of Velopharyngeal Function: A Brief Review for the Practicing Clinician

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Gross Anatomy ◽  
Normal Anatomy ◽  
Anatomy And Physiology ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Velopharyngeal Closure ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function ◽  
And Function ◽  
Abnormal Anatomy

In this article, I will provide a basic overview of the normal anatomy and physiology of velopharyngeal function. I will address topics such as the gross anatomy of the velopharyngeal mechanism, identification of the anatomy and function of the velopharyngeal musculature, and patterns of velopharyngeal closure that occur. I will also summarize the role of the velopharyngeal mechanism as it relates to aero-acoustic aspects of speech. Although the focus of this article is normal anatomy, I do include references to abnormal anatomy (e.g. cleft palate). I will include key points to an oral mechanism examination as it pertains to velopharyngeal function.

Surgical Considerations and Choices in the Management of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Jensen ◽  
Michael VanLue
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Speech Language Pathologist ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
History Of ◽  
Pharyngeal Flap ◽  
Sphincter Pharyngoplasty ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function

Determining the type of secondary surgical management to treat velopharyngeal dysfunction requires the incorporation of surgical indications and principles to the perceptual, acoustic/airflow, and imaging results of a comprehensive evaluation by a speech-language pathologist. In addition, how the specific type of surgical technique (primary and/or secondary) may affect velopharyngeal function also should be considered. The purpose of this paper is to consider three standard techniques commonly employed in speech surgery—Pharyngeal Flap; Sphincter Pharyngoplasty; and Furlow Double Opposing Z-Plasty—and provide examples of the specific imaging parameters that support the choice of surgical technique. In addition, information is provided regarding the characteristics of different primary surgical techniques for cleft palate which can influence velopharyngeal closure, given that the most common cause of velopharyngeal dysfunction seen in the clinic is a patient with a history of repaired cleft palate.

Perceptual Speech Outcomes After Early Primary Palatal Repair in Ugandan Patients With Cleft Palate

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562098024
Author(s):  
Kim Bettens ◽  
Laura Bruneel ◽  
Cassandra Alighieri ◽  
Daniel Sseremba ◽  
Duncan Musasizib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
English Speaking ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Early Primary ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function ◽  
Normal Speech

Objective: To provide speech outcomes of English-speaking Ugandan patients with a cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP±L). Design: Prospective case–control study. Setting: Referral hospital for patients with cleft lip and palate in Uganda. Participants: Twenty-four English-speaking Ugandan children with a CP±L (15 boys, 9 girls, mean 8.4 years) who received palatal closure prior to 6 months of age and an age- and gender-matched control group of Ugandan children without cleft palate. Interventions: Comparison of speech outcomes of the patient and control group. Main Outcome Measures: Perceptual speech outcomes including articulation, resonance, speech understandability and acceptability, and velopharyngeal composite score (VPC-sum). Information regarding speech therapy, fistula rate, and secondary surgery. Results: Normal speech understandability was observed in 42% of the patients, and 38% were judged with normal speech acceptability. Only 16% showed compensatory articulation. Acceptable resonance was found in 71%, and 75% of the patients were judged perceptually to present with competent velopharyngeal function based on the VPC-sum. Additional speech intervention was recommended in 25% of the patients. Statistically significant differences for all these variables were still observed with the control children ( P < .05). Conclusions: Overall, acceptable speech outcomes were found after early primary palatal closure. Comparable or even better results were found in comparison with international benchmarks, especially regarding the presence of compensatory articulation. Whether this approach is transferable to Western countries is the subject for further research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document