Economic analysis of a pilot commercial production for spotted babylon, Babylonia areolata (Link 1807), of marketable sizes using a flow-through culture system in Thailand

2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (15) ◽  
pp. 1265-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Chaitanawisuti ◽  
S Kritsanapuntu ◽  
Y Natsukari
Hydrobiologia ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 186-187 (1) ◽  
pp. 401-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren D. Nagata

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (18) ◽  
pp. 4328
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Morales-Vera ◽  
Jordan Crawford ◽  
Chang Dou ◽  
Renata Bura ◽  
Rick Gustafson

Most of the current commercial production of glacial acetic acid (GAA) is by petrochemical routes, primarily methanol carbonylation. GAA is an intermediate in the production of plastics, textiles, dyes, and paints. GAA production from biomass might be an economically viable and sustainable alternative to petroleum-derived routes. Separation of acetic acid from water is a major expense and requires considerable energy. This study evaluates and compares the technical and economic feasibility of GAA production via bioconversion using either ethyl acetate or alamine in diisobutylkerosene (DIBK) as organic solvents for purification. Models of a GAA biorefinery with a production of 120,650 tons/year were simulated in Aspen software. This biorefinery follows the path of pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, acetogen fermentation, and acid purification. Estimated capital costs for different scenarios ranged from USD 186 to 245 million. Recovery of GGA using alamine/DIBK was a more economical process and consumed 64% less energy, due to lower steam demand in the recovery distillation columns. The estimated average minimum selling prices of GGA were USD 756 and 877/ton for alamine/DIBK and ethyl acetate scenarios, respectively. This work establishes a feasible and sustainable approach to produce GGA from poplar biomass via fermentation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Liu ◽  
Rasish Khatri ◽  
Freddie Sarhan ◽  
Eric Blumber

Abstract A family of “flow-through” turboexpander-generators (TEGs) has been developed by Calnetix Technologies for hydrogen and natural gas pressure letdown applications. A flow-through TEG includes an axial expansion turbine and can be installed directly between two flanges of an existing pipeline. TEGs can be used to generate power throughout the hydrogen and natural gas transmission infrastructure using existing pressure differentials wherever a Joule-Thomson valve is located. These can be upstream, at terminal stations, and downstream, at governor stations. The expander drives a synchronous permanent magnet high-speed generator supported by active magnetic bearings. This paper describes the innovative axial flow-through system architecture, including the use of process gas for cooling the generator rotor and stator. The primary focus of the paper is the economic analysis of the application. Various TEG subsystem design choices and their impact on cost are discussed, including the generator, bearing, expander wheel, seal, and touchdown bearing resilient mount designs. A payback analysis shows that the natural gas TEG has a payback of 2.1 years when a heat exchanger is required for preheating the gas and 1.9 years when waste heat can be used. The hydrogen TEG has a payback of 2.0 years, and does not require external preheating. Finally, a comparison of this technology with other clean energy solutions is presented, using the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) formulation. The analysis confirms that the LCOE of the expander-generator ($0.40 per megawatt-hour) compares favorably with other types of conventional and renewable energy technologies on a cost basis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document