scholarly journals Numerical study on the steady suction active flow control of hydrofoil in the profile of the blended-wing-body underwater glider

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 801-809
Author(s):  
Xiaoxu Du ◽  
Lianying Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Flow Control ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Active Flow Control ◽  
Lift Coefficient ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Hydrodynamic Performance ◽  
Flow State ◽  
Underwater Glider ◽  
Blended Wing Body ◽  
Active Flow

The hydrodynamic performance of the blended-wing-body underwater glider can be improved by opening a hole on the surface and applying the steady suction active flow control. In order to explore the influence law and mechanism of the steady suction active flow control on the lift and drag performance of the hydrofoil, which is the profile of the blended-wing-body underwater glider, based on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method and SST k-ω turbulence model, the steady suction active flow control of hydrofoil under different conditions is studied, which include three suction factors: suction angle, suction position and suction ratio, as well as three different flow states: no stall, critical stall and over stall. Then the influence mechanism in over stall flow state is further analyzed. The results show that the flow separation state of NACA0015 hydrofoil can be effectively restrained and the flow field distribution around it can be improved by a reasonable steady suction, so as to the lift-drag performance of NACA0015 hydrofoil is improved. The effect of increasing lift and reducing drag of steady suction is best at 90° suction angle and symmetrical about 90° suction angle, and it is better when the steady suction position is closer to the leading edge of the hydrofoil. In addition, with the increase of the suction ratio, the influence of steady suction on the lift coefficient and drag coefficient of hydrofoil is greater.

Comparison of Two Active Flow Control Mechanisms of Pure Blowing and Pure Suction on a Pitching NACA0012 Airfoil at Reynolds Number of 1 × 106

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Asgari ◽  
Mehran Tadjfar
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Flow Control ◽  
Active Flow Control ◽  
Hysteresis Loops ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Airfoil Surface ◽  
Naca0012 Airfoil ◽  
Maximum Angle ◽  
Active Flow

In this study, we have applied and compared two active flow control (AFC) mechanisms on a pitching NACA0012 airfoil at Reynolds number of 1 × 106 using 2-D computational fluid dynamics (CFD). These mechanisms are continuous blowing and suction which are applied separately on the airfoil which pitches around its quarter-chord in a sinusoidal motion. The location for suction and blowing was determined in our previous study based on the formation of a counter clock-wise vortex near the leading-edge. In our current study, we have compared the effectiveness of pure blowing and pure suction in suppressing the dynamic stall vortex (DSV) which is the main contributor to the drag increase, particularly near the maximum angle of attack (AOA) and in early downstroke motion. The blowing/suction slot is considered as a dent on the airfoil surface which enables the AFC to perform in a tangential manner. This configuration would allow blowing jet to penetrate further downstream and was shown to be more effective compared to a cross-flow orientation. We have compared the two aforementioned mechanisms in terms of hysteresis loops of lift and drag coefficients and have demonstrated the dynamics of flow in controlled and uncontrolled situations.

Organization of Cylinder Wake Using a Splitter-Plate Active Flow Control

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Weiland ◽  
Pavlos Vlachos
Keyword(s):  
Circular Cylinder ◽  
Flow Control ◽  
Strouhal Number ◽  
Active Flow Control ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Splitter Plate ◽  
Cylinder Wake ◽  
Time Resolved ◽  
Image Velocimetry ◽  
Active Flow

Time Resolved Digital Particle Image Velocimetry (TRDPIV) was used in conjunction with spectral analysis to study the effects of Leading Edge Blowing (LEB) flow control on the near-wake of a circular cylinder. The airfoil was placed 1.9 circular cylinder diameters downstream, effectively acting as a splitter plate. Spectral measurements of the TRDPIV results indicated that the presence of the airfoil decreased the Strouhal number from 0.19 to 0.12 as anticipated. When activated the LEB jet organized the circular cylinder wake, effectively neutralizing the effect of the splitter plate and modifying the wake so as to return the Strouhal number to 0.19. Thus the circular cylinder wake returned to its normal shedding frequency, even in the presence of the airfoil. Evidence presented in this study supports the notion that the LEB jet directly excites the circular cylinder shear layers causing instability, roll up, and subsequent vortex shedding.

Numerical Investigation of an Elastomer-Piezo-Adaptive Blade for Active Flow Control of a Nonsteady Flow Field Using Fluid–Structure Interaction Simulations

2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tien Dat Phan ◽  
Patrick Springer ◽  
Robert Liebich
Keyword(s):  
Flow Control ◽  
Active Flow Control ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Material Behavior ◽  
Fluid Structure ◽  
Numerical Investigations ◽  
Pulsed Detonation ◽  
Stator Blade ◽  
Suitable Concept ◽  
Active Flow

In order to prevent critical effects due to pulsed detonation propulsion, e.g., incidence fluctuations, an elastomer-piezo-adaptive stator blade with a deformable front part is developed. Numerical investigations with respect to the interaction of fluid and structure including the piezoelectric properties and the hyperelastic material behavior of an elastomer membrane are conducted in order to investigate the concept of the elastomer-piezo-adaptive blade for developing the best suitable concept for subsequent experiments with a stator cascade in a wind tunnel. Results of numerical investigations of the structure-dynamic and fluid mechanical behavior of the elastomer-piezo-adaptive blade by using a novel fluid–structure-piezoelectric-elastomer-interaction simulation (FSPEI simulation) show that the latent danger of a laminar flow separation at the leading edge at incidence fluctuations can be prevented by using an adaptive blade. Therefore, the potential of the concept of the elastomer-piezo-adaptive blade for active flow control is verified. Furthermore, it is essential to consider the interactions between fluid and structure of the transient FSPEI simulations, since not only the deformation of the adaptive blade affects the flow around the blade, the flow has a significant effect on the dynamic behavior of the adaptive blade, as well.

Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Blended-Wing-Body Aircraft With A Serpentine Inlet Using Flow Control Techniques

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Sik Youn ◽  
Youn-Jea Kim
Keyword(s):  
Flow Control ◽  
Flow Separation ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Active Flow Control ◽  
Quantitative Measure ◽  
Aerodynamic Characteristics ◽  
Interface Plane ◽  
Flow Distortion ◽  
Blended Wing Body ◽  
Active Flow

Abstract Demands of a modern aircraft regarding its aerodynamic performance and high efficiency are ever-growing. An S-shaped inlet, as known as a serpentine duct, plays a significant role in increasing fuel efficiency. Recently, the serpentine duct is commonly employed for military aircraft to block the front of the jet engine from radar. However, delivering a non-uniformly distorted flow to the engine face (aerodynamic interface plane, AIP) though a serpentine duct is inevitable due to the existence of flow separation and swirl flow in the duct. The effect of distortion is to cause the engine compressor to surge; thus, it may impact on the life-cycle of aircraft engine. In this study, aerodynamic characteristics of a serpentine duct mounted on a blended-wing-body (BWB) aircraft was thoroughly investigated to determine where and how the vortex flow was generated. In particular, both passive and active flow control were implemented at a place where the flow separation was occurred to minimize the flow distortion rate in the duct. The passive and active flow control systems were used with vortex generator (VG) vanes and air suctions, respectively. A pair of VG s have been made as a set, and 6 sets of VG in the serpentine duct. For the active flow control, 19 air suctions have been implemented. Both flow control devices have been placed in three different locations. To evaluate the performance of flow control system, it is necessary to quantify the flow uniformity at the AIP. Therefore, coefficient of distortion, DC(60) was used as the quantitative measure of distortion. Also, change in DC(60) value while the BWB aircraft is maneuvering phase was analyzed.

Active flow control concepts and application opportunities

2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 725-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heribert Bieler
Keyword(s):  
Flow Control ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Active Flow Control ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Design Activity ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Low Speed ◽  
Significant Step ◽  
Active Flow

Purpose Aerodynamics drives the aircraft performance and, thus, influences fuel consumption and environmental compatibility. Further, optimization of aerodynamic shapes is an ongoing design activity in industrial offices; this will lead to incremental improvements. More significant step changes in performance are not expected from pure passive shape design. However, active flow control is a key technology, which has the potential to realize a drastic step change in performance. Flow control targets two major goals: low speed performance enhancements mainly for start and landing phase via control of separation and drag reduction at high speed conditions via skin friction and shock wave control. Design/methodology/approach This paper highlights flow control concepts and Airbus involvements for both items. To mature flow control systematically, local applications of separation control technology are of major importance for Airbus. In parallel, but at lower maturity level, investigations are ongoing to reduce the turbulent skin friction at cruise. A popular concept to delay separation at low speed conditions is the implementation of jet actuation control systems flush mounted to the wall of aerodynamic components. Findings In 2006, DLR (in collaboration with universities Berlin, Braunschweig and industrial partner Airbus) started to study active flow control for separation delay towards application. Based on basic proof of concepts (achieved in national projects), further flow control hardware developments and wind tunnel and lab testing took place in European funded projects. Originality/value Significant lift enhancements were realized via flow control applied to the wing leading edge and the flap.

scholarly journals FLOW CONTROL USING MOVING SURFACE AT THE LEADING EDGE OF AEROFOIL

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kh Md Faisal ◽  
M A Salam ◽  
M A Taher Ali ◽  
Md. Samad Sarkar ◽  
Wasiul Safa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Flow Control ◽  
Control Strategies ◽  
Active Flow Control ◽  
Lift Coefficient ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Moving Surface ◽  
Surface Boundary Layer

Flow control is a significant topic of research in the field of aviation. Researchers in this field are continuously trying their best to find various flow control strategies in order to extract aerodynamic benefits by applying them. Applying moving surface at the leading edge of aerofoil is a type of strategy among the various types of active flow control strategies. In the present research work a rotating cylinder is added on the leading edge of the aerofoil as a moving surface in order to control the flow over its surface. The moving surface boundary layer control is applied to NACA 0018 airfoil for investigating its aerodynamic benefits and effectiveness. The moving surface is created by rotating a smooth cylinder at the leading edge of the aerofoil. The peripheral velocity of the cylinder injects momentum to the upper surface boundary layer of the aerofoil and thus delays its separation. This results in the gain in both the maximum lift coefficient and the stall angle. The work has been done at four different Reynolds Number i.e., at Re = 1.4 X 10^5, 1.85 X 10^5, 2.3 X 10^5, 2.8 X 10^5 at different angles of attack.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document