scholarly journals Use of explosibility diagrams in potentially explosive atmospheres

2020 ◽  
Vol 305 ◽  
pp. 00087
Author(s):  
Adrian Matei ◽  
Răzvan Drăgoescu ◽  
Nicolae Ianc ◽  
Emeric Chiuzan ◽  
Florin Rădoi

Although the first research in the field was carried out by Davy in 1816, the first discovery emerged in 1891 when Le Chatellier defined the law for determining the explosive limits. Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) represents the lowest concentration of gas or vapours in air which is able to generate the explosion in the presence of an efficient ignition source. It is considered to be the same as the Lower Flammability Limit (LFL). Upper Explosive Limit (UEL) represents the highest concentration of gas or vapours in air which is able to generate the explosion in the presence of an efficient ignition source. It is considered to be similar with the Upper Flammability Limit (UFL) [1]. For the optimal management of underground or surface industrial environments, confined, obstructed or open environments, is required to know the point which defines the monitored atmosphere in relation with the explosion triangle. For confined underground environments, monitoring the atmosphere and using the explosibility diagrams are required during the closure process and also for re-opening the area. For underground environments specific to active mine workings and for industrial environments located on the surface, monitoring the atmosphere and using explosibility diagrams are required permanently.

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1005-1017
Author(s):  
GeQun Shu ◽  
Xu Huo ◽  
Hua Tian ◽  
Rui Sun ◽  
JinWen Cai

2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-57
Author(s):  
Radoslaw Bandomir ◽  
Mariusz Krawczyk ◽  
Jacek Namiesnik

We present the results of a first stage of development work on a new type of analyzer for hydrogen and C1–C3hydrocarbons concentration measurements in the lower explosive limit range, based on single pellistor sensor with artificial neural network data postprocessing.


2005 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Villatoro ◽  
Donato Luna-Moreno ◽  
David Monzón-Hernández

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 1899-1907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Ding ◽  
Yaping He ◽  
Jiusheng Yin ◽  
Wei Yao ◽  
Dechuang Zhou ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 1085-1095 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Kul ◽  
D. L. Gnann ◽  
A. L. Beyerlein ◽  
D. D. DesMarteau

2019 ◽  
Vol 964 ◽  
pp. 33-39
Author(s):  
Nur Aqidah Muhammad Harinder Khan ◽  
Siti Zubaidah Sulaiman ◽  
Izirwan Izhab ◽  
Siti Kholijah Abdul Mudalip ◽  
Rohaida Che Man ◽  
...  

Biogas which consists of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) could explode when diluted to a certain degree with air in the presence of ignition source. The maximum explosion overpressure (Pmax), the maximum rate of pressure rise (dP/dt)max, flammability limits, and deflagration index are the most important explosion severities parameters to characterize the risk of explosion. In this research paper, the effect of equivalence ratio (ER) of biogas/air mixtures and the effect of CO2 concentrations presence in biogas were studied in a 20 L spherical vessel. The values of Pmax and (dP/dt)max of biogas/air mixtures were more severe at ER 1.2. At various CO2 content, Pmax and (dP/dt)max of biogas/air mixtures were the least affected at 45% vol/vol of CO2. On the other hand, deflagration index (KG) of biogas/air mixtures trend was the most severe at 35% vol/vol of CO2 content despite the lowest Pmax and (dP/dt)max at 45% vol/vol of CO2 content. The lowest values in Pmax and (dP/dt)max were due to the diffusivity properties of CH4 that had surpassed the CO2 suppression effect. Furthermore, the presence of CO2 in biogas/air mixtures had increased the upper flammability limit and lower flammability limit of biogas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document