Clinical and economic aspects of managing venous thromboembolism in the outpatient setting

2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (2, Suppl 5) ◽  
pp. 58-66
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Agnelli ◽  
Cecilia Becattini
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-385
Author(s):  
K. V. Lobastov ◽  
A. R. Navasardyan ◽  
I. V. Schastlivtsev

Aim. To assess the duration of the anticoagulant treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in various categories of patients in real clinical practice through survey of practitioners, as well as correspondence of the duration with current clinical guidelines.Material and methods. Data obtained from electronic survey of practicing surgeons as part of a commercial brand assessment (Brand Adoption Monitor) was studied. Survey was carried out by the "Validata” analytical agency at the request and with the financial support of Bayer. Inpatient and outpatient vascular surgeons, as well as general outpatient surgeons were invited to complete the electronic questionnaire. The number of interviewed specialists was 100: 50 inpatient vascular surgeons and 50 outpatient specialists, among whom the share of vascular surgeons (phlebologists, angi-ologists) was about 20%. The study was completed in 20 cities of Russia with a population of at least 200,000 people from all federal districts except the North Caucasus and the Republic of Crimea. The selection criteria for participants were: work experience in the specialty ≥3 years, work experience at the current organization >6 months, ≥5 patients with VTE during in the last month.Results. In total, 104 doctors were surveyed during the period from December 11, 2019 to January 20, 2020, of which 50 were inpatient vascular surgeons and 54 were from outpatient setting. According to the survey of vascular surgeons in hospitals, 75% (6 [5;10]) of patients were hospitalized with a primary episode of VTE and 25% (2 [1;4]) with a recurrent thrombotic event. In an outpatient surgeon, 27.5% (3 [2;5]) of patients were treated in an outpatient setting without hospitalization, 34.7% (3 [2;5]) came to an appointment immediately after discharge from the hospital and 38.8% (2 [1;4]) were a repeat visit regarding a previous VTE. Most often, surgeons observed episodes of clinically unprovoked VTE in 27.3% of cases, thrombotic events provoked by major transient risk factors were 12.2%, event provoked by small transient risk factors were 13.3% and events provoked by small persistent risk factors were 12.6%, while cancer-associated thrombosis represented 13.5%. Most surgeons chose to prescribe anticoagulant therapy beyond 3 months. About half of the specialists prescribed therapy for a year or longer for cancer-associated thrombosis and recurrent VTE. When treating the first episode of clinically unprovoked VTE, about half of the respondents chose anticoagulation for a period of 3 to 6 months. About 60% of specialists prescribed anticoagulant therapy for a period of 3 to 6 months to patients with minor transient or persistent risk factors and patients with VTE provoked by major transient risk factor (trauma or surgery).Conclusion. Correspondence of the duration of anticoagulant therapy in real clinical practice with the international clinical guidelines varies within 450% range and, on average, does not exceed 30%. This discrepancy was both in situations when the duration of therapy was lower than recommended, but also in situations when treatment extension would not have been recommended.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18289-e18289
Author(s):  
Mikhail A Cherkashin ◽  
Natalia A Berezina

e18289 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in oncology patients during external beam radiation therapy (RT) in outpatient setting is the challenging question. We performed analysis of our own data. The aim of study is the clear assessment of VTE incidence in these patients Methods: In retrospective analysis 5134 patients' medical records were included (2612 with RT and 2522 with chemotherapy). Inclusion criteria were: RT in outpatient setting and chemotherapy in outpatient setting. Exclusion criteria: combined radiochemotherapy, hospitalzation, central venous catheter, palliative treatment. 487 patients were selected for the final analysis and stratified in 3 groups: group I (n = 165) 3D-conformal RT for brain tumors or brain metastasis; group II (n = 158) RT for body tumors (abdominal, retroabdominal, pelvic, chest, breast); group III (n = 164) was control –brain and body tumors on chemotherapy. Mean fraction numbers were 25 (11 - 32), mean total dose – 52 Gy (22 - 66). VTE assessment based on clinical data, ultrasound examination (US) and chest CT. Statistical analysis was performed by OpenEpi, Version 3 software pack. Results: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was detected in 10 cases (6.06%) in group I, 4 cases in group II and 4 case in control group. VTE patients has a different tumors (astrocytomas, brain trunk tumors, skull basis cancer, rectal cancer, breast cancer). 3 patients were available for long-term outcomes assessment (12 months after radiation therapy). During 1-year period we haven’t detected thrombosis recurrence. One patient on 11th follow-up month was exposed with repeated course of RT without any complications. The difference between VTE incidence for group I and group III characterized by statistical significance (p = 0.018). Risk difference for these groups was 5% (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Based on study results we suggest that external beam radiation therapy is potentially an independent risk factor for VTE development even in outpatient settings. High degree of clinical suspicion and aggressive diagnostic work-up in case of suspicion is necessary. In our opinion low molecular weight heparins prevention should be considered at least during active radiation therapy.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 565-565
Author(s):  
Susan R Kahn ◽  
Sam Schulman ◽  
Josée Martineau ◽  
John A Stewart ◽  
Anne McLeod ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 565 Introduction: Little is known about patterns and quality of venous thromboembolism (VTE) management in Canadian outpatient settings, including how closely clinicians adhere to evidence based treatment guidelines. Such information could help identify gaps in patient care requiring attention. Objectives: To obtain prospective, clinical practice-based data from Canadian outpatient settings on 1) management of VTE; 2) determinants of patterns of VTE management; 3) degree of adherence with ACCP 2008 VTE treatment guidelines; and 4) frequency of bleeding and recurrent VTE during follow-up. Methods: We performed a multi-centre prospective observational study to evaluate physician practice patterns and degree of adherence to ACCP consensus guidelines for VTE treatment. From 2007–2010, we enrolled 915 consecutive patients with objectively confirmed acute symptomatic VTE who received treatment with the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin alone or with warfarin in the outpatient setting (mainly thrombosis clinics) in 12 Canadian centers. Patients attended an enrolment visit, where data on demographics, site(s) of VTE, VTE risk factors, bleeding risk factors, creatinine clearance and initial treatment were recorded. A follow-up visit occurred when anticoagulant treatment was stopped or at 6 months, whichever occurred first. Indicators of adherence to VTE treatment guidelines included: (1) having received any thromboprophylaxis for VTE associated with transient risk factors (recent medical admission, major surgery or leg immobilization); (2) use of LMWH monotherapy to treat cancer-associated VTE; (3) at least 5 days median duration of LMWH in patients treated with initial LMWH overlapped with warfarin; (4) at least 1 day overlap of LMWH and warfarin once INR was therapeutic. Recurrent VTE, bleeding and adverse events were recorded throughout study follow-up. Results: At the time of abstract submission, end of study data were available for 747 of 915 enrolled patients. Average age was 56 years, 54% were male and mean body mass index was 28.3 kg/m2. Index VTE was lower or upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in 511 (68.4%) patients, pulmonary embolism (PE) with or without DVT in 218 (29.2%) patients, and unusual site DVT in 18 (2.4%) patients. VTE was associated with cancer in 70 (9.4%) patients, transient risk factors in 289 (38.7%) patients, hormonal risk factors in 55 (7.4%) patients and was deemed unprovoked in 331 (44.3%) patients. Overall, enoxaparin was prescribed at a dose/frequency of 1.5 mg/kg QD in 85.4% of patients, 1.0 mg/kg BID in 14.6% of patients and 1.0 mg/kg QD for one patient who had creatinine clearance <30ml/min. Among patients with VTE risk factors such as recent medical admission, recent surgery or paralysis, only 37.3% had been prescribed thromboprophylaxis. Among patients with cancer-related VTE (n=70), 61.4% were prescribed LMWH monotherapy, a majority received 1.5 mg/kg once daily, and 42.9% received such treatment for >3 months. Among patients treated with initial LMWH overlapped with warfarin (n= 667; 89.3%), median duration of LMWH was 8 days (IQR 6–10 days), median duration of warfarin was 182 days (IQR 115–190) and median overlap with LMWH once INR was therapeutic was 1 day (IQR 1–2 days). However, 48 (7.2%) patients received <5 days LMWH and 99 (15%) patients had overlap <1 day. During follow-up, 16 (2.1%) patients had recurrent VTE, at a median of 71 days follow-up; rate of recurrent VTE was highest (8.6%) and occurred earliest (median, 49 days) in cancer patients. Major bleeding events (primarily GI or GU) occurred in 10 (1.3%) patients at a median of 23 days; at the time of bleed, 2 patients were receiving LMWH alone, 3 patients, LMWH and warfarin, and 5 patients, warfarin alone. Conclusions: Our study provides useful information on clinical features of patients, management of VTE and rates of recurrence and bleeding in Canadian outpatients. Our results suggest that there are important gaps in (1) use of thromboprophylaxis to prevent VTE and (2) use of LMWH monotherapy to treat VTE in cancer patients. Conversely, in patients treated with combination LMWH/warfarin therapy, adherence to recommendations regarding minimum duration of LMWH and minimum overlap of LMWH and warfarin once INR was therapeutic was quite good. Disclosures: Kahn: Sigvaris: Research Funding; sanofi-aventis: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim:. Schulman:Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria.


2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (07) ◽  
pp. 488-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Prandoni

SummaryUnfractionated heparin (UFH) in adjusted doses and low-molecularweight heparins (LMWH) in fixed doses are the chosen therapy for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism. The use of UFH protocols ensures that virtually all patients will promptly achieve the therapeutic range for the activated partial thromboplastin time. However, proper use of UFH requires considerable expertise, can cause inconvenience and has limitations. Unmonitored therapy with subcutaneous LMWH is at least as effective and safe as adjusted-dose UFH, is associated with a considerable reduction of mortality in cancer patients, and permits the treatment of suitable patients in an outpatient setting.LMWH in high prophylactic doses is more effective than UFH and oral anticoagulants for prevention of postoperative venous thrombosis in major orthopedic surgery. Whether thromboprophylaxis should be continued for a few additional weeks after hospital discharge is controversial. LMWH and UFH are equally effective for prevention of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis in cancer patients. In a recent controlled randomized trial, enoxaparin in high prophylactic doses was an effective and safe measure of thromboprophylaxis in ordinary bedridden patients.The efficacy and safety of pentasaccharide (the smallest antithrombin binding sequence of heparin) in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolic disorders is currently under investigation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110007
Author(s):  
Kristen H. Bakey ◽  
Cam-Tu N. Nguyen

Background: It is now widely accepted to manage low risk acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the outpatient setting with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Although DOACs are straightforward to dose, they are high risk medications and not immune to medication errors. There is limited evidence that pharmacists’ intervention has an impact on DOAC discharge medication errors in the ED. Objective: To determine if pharmacist involvement reduced the rate of DOAC discharge medication errors in low risk VTE patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated a clinical pharmacy service implemented prior to the study. Included patients were evaluated in 2 groups: the cohort with pharmacist involvement and the cohort without pharmacist involvement. The primary outcome was the rate of anticoagulation medication errors. Results: A total of 58 patients were evaluated. Of these patients, 14 had a pharmacist directly involved with their care in the ED while 44 patients did not. The rate of medication errors was lower when a pharmacist was involved, 7.1% (n = 1), compared to when a pharmacist was not involved, 36.4% (n = 16), (p = 0.046). All patients in the pharmacist involvement group received anticoagulation counseling prior to discharge compared to only 56.8% of patients in the non-pharmacist involvement group (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Our protocol for pharmacist involvement at the time of VTE diagnosis during an ED admission showed a reduced rate of anticoagulation medication errors when a pharmacist was involved. This benefit could potentially translate into improved outcomes such as readmission rates, patient safety outcomes, and hospitalizations.


TH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. e218-e219
Author(s):  
Alex M. Ebied ◽  
Jeremiah Jessee ◽  
Yiqing Chen ◽  
Jason Konopack ◽  
Nila Radhakrishnan ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis during hospitalization has clearly defined metrics for risk stratification and practice policy employed to ensure processes of adherence. However, acceptance for practice or even the level and timeline of risk is less clear during the immediate time after hospitalization. With emerging new oral anticoagulant agents, data are available that may influence prescribing in the outpatient setting following hospitalization. A survey was created to determine the level of acceptance or influences for practice surrounding continuation of anticoagulation following hospitalization. Methods This study was designed as a single-center survey of hospitalist and family medicine physician to assess influences to the physician's impression for risk of VTE prophylaxis and knowledge of therapy options. Results Physicians reported depending heavily on medical center protocols for determining anticoagulation at hospital discharge. Prescribing postdischarge anticoagulation was reported to be affected by lack of comfort with prescribing oral medications and concerns with risk of bleeding for all types of anticoagulation outweighing the perceived benefit. Additionally, the decision whether to prescribe these medications at discharge was reported to be related to perceived cost and other patient barriers such as concerns over route of administration. Conclusion Concerns for bleeding were an influence and likely resulted in shorter duration for VTE prophylaxis being prescribed posthospitalization.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 192S
Author(s):  
Frederick A. Spencer ◽  
Cathy Emery ◽  
Darleen Lessard ◽  
Frederick A. Anderson ◽  
Sri Emani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document