Zukunft der Laparoskopie und Robotik in der Urologie

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (06) ◽  
pp. 488-499
Author(s):  
Jens Rassweiler ◽  
Ali Goezen ◽  
Jan-Thorsten Klein ◽  
Marie-Claire Rassweiler-Seyfried

ZusammenfassungDie Robotik hat die klassische Laparoskopie in den letzen Jahren etwas an den Rand gedrängt. Dennoch hat sich auch die Laparoskopie und Retroperitoneoskopie in den letzten Jahren technologisch weiterentwickelt mit 4K-Ultra-HD-Videotechnologie, 3D-HD-Videosystemen, miniaturisierten Instrumenten, modernen Schneid- und Koagulationsverfahren, Instrumenten mit 7 Freiheitsgraden und ergnomischen Plattformen Ethos Chair®. Aufgrund der auslaufendenden Patente von Intuitive Surgical wird ab 2019 eine Konkurrenzsituation mit neuen Herstellern von Operationsrobotern existieren. Diese müssen erst belegen, ob sie den hohen Qualitätsstandard der Da-Vinci-Serie (SI, X, XI) bieten können. Dies betrifft die Art der Konsole, Anordnung der Roboterarme, Technologie des 3D-Videosystems und Qualität und Freiheitsgrade der Endeffektoren. Robotersysteme für die Endourologie sind Avicenna Roboflex® für die flexible Ureteroskopie und AquaBeam®-System für die Roboter-assistierte Aquaablation der Prostata. Während Roboflex ähnlich dem Da-Vinci-System die Ergonomie des Eingriffes erleichtert, ersetzt die robotergestützte Aquaablation erstmals den Operateur.

2007 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Moo Kang ◽  
Hoon Sang Chi ◽  
Woo Jin Hyeung ◽  
Kyung Sik Kim ◽  
Jin Sub Choi ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian K. McLeod ◽  
Patrick C. Melder

The da Vinci Surgical System is a new and exciting entrant into the field of robotic technology. This system is undergoing considerable research and is being practically applied in general surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, urology, and gynecology. We have previously described our experience with the da Vinci system in the laboratory setting, and we have reviewed its potential applications in otolaryngology. Here we present a case report of the first da Vinci-assisted excision of a vallecular cyst in a human. Although we initially encountered some difficulties in the setup, we were able to perform the procedure with moderate ease and without complication. The potential of the da Vinci system in otolaryngology is promising. Further research is needed to explore all of its possible uses in our field.


2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-114
Author(s):  
Arun Prasad ◽  
Ramesh Kumar Aggarwal ◽  
Abhishek Tiwari ◽  
Vachan S. Hukkeri

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 567
Author(s):  
S. Crivellaro ◽  
M. Abbinante ◽  
A. Palazzetti ◽  
E. Finotto ◽  
B. Frea

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oona Franké ◽  
Fabrice Narducci ◽  
Elisabeth Chereau-Ewald ◽  
Marion Orsoni ◽  
Camille Jauffret ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to demonstrate that robotically assisted laparoscopy for aortic lymph node dissection was improved when double docking (DD) of the Da Vinci system is used for combined surgical procedures [defined by the combination of a pelvic procedure and a para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL)].MethodsFrom February 2007 to February 2013, 41 patients underwent combined procedures including PAL up to the left renal vein in 2 cancer centers. We used 2 different approaches as follows: a single docking (SD) of the Da Vinci system (transperitoneal PAL and pelvic surgery) during the first period (22 patients) and a DD during the second period (19 patients). We recorded retrospectively the lymph node count (main criteria), operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complications.ResultsWe observed a statistical difference between SD and DD concerning aortic lymph node count (5.86 vs 10.89,P< 0.005). Operative time is longer in the DD group (326.1 vs 239.4 minutes,P< 0.05). No difference was observed concerning estimated blood loss. Hospital stay was longer in the DD group (4.9 vs 3.2 days,P< 0.05). Only 1 conversion to open was described in the SD group.ConclusionsIn our experience of robotically assisted laparoscopy, when PAL is combined to a pelvic procedure, the use of a DD seems to improve aortic lymph node count.Despite a longer operative time compared to SD, DD seems to be a good solution to combine the advantages of robotic assistance to our quality criteria of aortic dissection.SynopsisWe compare 2 techniques to realize robotic assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy combined with pelvic procedure. Double docking seems to improve histological results compared to single docking.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document