scholarly journals Clinical usefulness of the S-O clip during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in difficult-to-access submucosal layer

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (03) ◽  
pp. E437-E444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Okamoto ◽  
Shiro Oka ◽  
Shinji Tanaka ◽  
Katsuaki Inagaki ◽  
Hidenori Tanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Submucosal Layer ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background and study aims In colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the S-O clip improves the accessibility to the submucosal layer of the colon. However, its safety and usefulness in difficult colorectal ESDs are unclear. Thus, in this study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of the S-O clip in colorectal ESD in the difficult-to-access submucosal layer. Patients and methods From January 2016 to December 2016, 189 consecutive cases of colorectal ESD were performed at Hiroshima University Hospital before the S-O clip was introduced. Between January 2017 and June 2018, among 271 consecutive colorectal ESD cases, 41 cases were performed colorectal ESD using the S-O clip. We compared outcomes between the two groups (41 cases with S-O clip [use group] and 189 cases without S-O clip [non-use group]) using propensity score matching. Results Prior to propensity score matching, 41 cases with the S-O clip (use group) and 189 cases without the S-O clip (non-use group) were extracted. The degree of submucosal fibrosis was more severe and the procedure time was longer in the use group than in the non-use group. In the use and non-use groups, en bloc resection (100 % vs. 94.7 %) and complete en bloc resection (100 % vs. 92.6 %) rates were satisfactory. After propensity score matching, 33 cases in each group were extracted. As a result, complete en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the use group than in the non-use group (100 % vs. 84.9 %). Conclusion The S-O clip is effective and can be used safely in colorectal ESD in the difficult-to-access submucosal layer.

scholarly journals Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with single clip traction: a feasibility study

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (05) ◽  
pp. E653-E658
Author(s):  
Tatsuma Nomura ◽  
Yoshikazu Hayashi ◽  
Takaaki Morikawa ◽  
Masahiro Okada ◽  
Hisashi Fukuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Major Axis ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Mucosal Incision ◽  
Axis Length ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background and study aims The pocket-creation method (PCM) facilitates dissection of the central part of a tumor. We previously developed the PCM with clip traction (PCM-CT) to facilitate opening the mucosal pocket, which otherwise could become cumbersome. In the present study, we aimed to examine the feasibility of PCM-CT for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Patients and methods PCM-CT was performed on 30 patients with early colorectal tumors from October 2019 to April 2020. PCM-CT allows efficient opening of the mucosal pocket by using the PCM to dissect the center of the lesion and then apply traction with a single clip after making a circumferential mucosal incision. Results The median specimen major axis length, ESD time, ESD speed, and en bloc resection rate were 48 mm, 84 minutes, 20 mm2/min, and 100 % (30/30), respectively. The success rates for the traction clip and median single-clip-traction time were 100 % (30/30) and 1.5 minutes, respectively. Conclusions Colorectal ESD using PCM-CT is a simple and promising method.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of S-O Clip-Assisted Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Haruka Fujinami ◽  
Akira Teramoto ◽  
Saeko Takahashi ◽  
Takayuki Ando ◽  
Shinya Kajiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
The Right ◽  
Surgery Duration

This study aimed to assess the utility of the S-O clip during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We conducted a retrospective study on 185 patients who underwent colorectal ESD from January 2015 to January 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: before and after the introduction of the S-O clip. Forty-two patients underwent conventional ESD (CO group) and 29 patients underwent ESD using the S-O clip (SO group). We compared the surgery duration, dissection speed, en bloc resection rate, and complication rate between both groups. Compared with the CO group, the SO group had a significantly shorter surgery duration (70.7 ± 37.9 min vs. 51.2 ± 18.6 min; p = 0.017), a significantly higher dissection speed (15.1 ± 9.0 min vs. 26.3 ± 13.8 min; p < 0.001), a significantly higher en bloc resection rate (80.9% vs. 98.8%; p ≤ 0.001), and a significantly lower perforation rate (4.3% vs. 1.3%). In the right colon, the surgery duration was significantly shorter and the dissection speed was significantly higher in the SO group than in the CO group. Moreover, the rate of en bloc resection improved significantly in the right colon. S-O clip-assisted ESD reduces the procedure time and improves the treatment effects, especially in the right colon.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Inner Traction Facilitated Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection using Rubber Band and Clips for Colorectal Neoplasms: A Propensity Score-matched Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanyi Liu ◽  
Xinyue Guo ◽  
Yunlong Cai ◽  
Long Rong ◽  
Weidong Nian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasms ◽  
Rubber Band ◽  
Lateral Spreading ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Matched Study

Abstract Background Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically demanding but effective treatment for superficial neoplasms. We conducted a study to compare the effectiveness and safety of inner traction facilitated ESD using rubber band and clip (RAC-ESD) with conventional ESD.Methods We retrospectively evaluated 622 consecutive patients underwent colorectal ESD between January 2016 and December 2019. To overcome selection bias, we used propensity score matching (1:4) between RAC-ESD and conventional ESD. The frequency of en bloc resections, R0 resections, curative resections, procedure speed and complications were evaluated.Results After propensity score matching, 35 patients were included in RAC-ESD group and 140 were included in conventional ESD group. RAC-ESD resulted in a significant increase in resection speed (0.14 vs. 0.09 cm2/min; P=0.003). There were no significant differences in en bloc, R0 and curative resection rates between two groups. In subgroup analysis, the resection speed of RAC-ESD was significantly higher than conventional ESD when the lesions were equal to or larger than 2cm, macroscopically presenting as lateral spreading tumor, and located in transverse colon to ascending colon.Conclusions RAC-ESD is safe and effective in treating colorectal neoplasms, especially in lesions presenting particular difficulty.

Risk factors for conversion to snare resection during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in an expert Western center

Endoscopy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (02) ◽  
pp. 152-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles ◽  
Christophe Snauwaert ◽  
Tom Moreels ◽  
Anne Jouret-Mourin ◽  
Pierre Deprez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background There are limited data regarding the risk factors and consequences of conversion to endoscopic mucosal resection (rescue EMR) during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in Western centers. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, from which 225 consecutive ESDs performed between 2013 and 2017 were selected. Of the included patients, 39 (18.6 %) required rescue EMR. Pre- and per-procedure characteristics were evaluated to determine the features associated with the need for rescue EMR. Outcomes and complications were also assessed. Results 210 patients were included, with median tumor size of 40 mm (range 20 – 110) and most tumors being in a non-rectal location (66.2 %). When compared with full ESD, rescue EMR was significantly associated with lower rates of en bloc resection (43.6 % vs. 100 %) and complete resection (R0 status; 28.2 % vs. 88.9 %), and with a higher rate of recurrence (5.1 % vs. 0 %) and more need for surgery (15.4 % vs. 3.5 %). In multivariable analysis, non-lifting (adjusted odds ratio [ORa] 3.06, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.23 – 7.66; P = 0.02), nongranular-type laterally spreading tumor (LST-NG; ORa 2.56, 95 %CI 1.10 – 5.99; P = 0.03), and difficult retroflexion (OR 3.22, 95 %CI 1.01 – 10.28; P = 0.049) were independent risk factors associated with conversion to rescue EMR, while tumor size and location were not. Conclusions During ESD, the presence of poor lifting, LST-NG morphology, and a difficult retroflexed approach were factors associated with the need to convert to rescue EMR. Conversion to rescue EMR remains a valuable strategy.

scholarly journals Usefulness of “Nelaton Attachment” for endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal neoplasms

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (09) ◽  
pp. E1187-E1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taiji Yoshimoto ◽  
Hiroshi Takihara ◽  
Tomoatsu Yoshihara ◽  
Taro Inoue ◽  
Kohei Ishibashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Novel Device ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background and study aims Although colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has enabled high en bloc resection rates regardless of tumor size, colorectal ESD is still a challenging procedure. We developed a novel device called the Nelaton Attachment, which allows endoscopists to manipulate the ESD knives using two fingers of their left hand while holding the endoscope with their right hand. We retrospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of the Nelaton Attachment for colorectal ESD. We compared efficacy and safety between Nelaton Attachment and non-Nelaton Attachment groups, and also conducted an ex vivo experiment to evaluate the effect of the Nelaton Attachment. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed 36 consecutive patients with 37 colorectal tumors who had undergone ESD at Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital and Naritatomisato Tokushukai Hospital between April 2016 and September 2018. The Nelaton Attachment was used for 22 of the 37 colorectal ESDs. In the ex vivo experiment, endoscopists inserted and withdrew an ESD knife 2 cm using two fingers of their left hand with and without the Nelaton Attachment. Results Median procedure time was significantly shorter in the Nelaton Attachment group (38 min [range 6 – 195 min]) compared to the non-Nelaton Attachment group (75 min [range 17 – 198 min]; P = 0.030). Median time to complete the ex vivo experiment five times was significantly faster with the Nelaton Attachment than without the Nelaton Attachment (P = 0.001). Conclusions Use of the Nelaton Attachment for colorectal ESD is feasible and safe, and may facilitate colorectal ESD procedures.

scholarly journals The efficacy of the pocket-creation method for cases with severe fibrosis in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (08) ◽  
pp. E975-E983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naohisa Yoshida ◽  
Yuji Naito ◽  
Ritsu Yasuda ◽  
Takaaki Murakami ◽  
Ryohei Hirose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Intramucosal Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Severe Fibrosis

Abstract Background and study aims Severe fibrosis poses a challenge in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Recently, the pocket-creation method (PCM) has been developed for overcoming various difficulties of ESD. A specific tapered hood is used for adequate traction in the PCM, and endoscopic operability becomes stable in the pocket. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of the PCM in ESD for cases with severe fibrosis. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed 1000 consecutive colorectal ESD cases (April 2006 to January 2017). Since 2016, the PCM was performed in 58 cases. The indications for ESD included (1) tumors ≥ 20 mm in size diagnosed as intramucosal cancer or high-grade dysplasia and part of T1a cancer using magnifying endoscopic examinations and (2) tumors that appeared impossible to resect with endoscopic mucosal resection because of suspected fibrosis. We identified 120 cases with severe fibrosis and compared them to cases without severe fibrosis. Additionally, the 120 severe fibrosis cases were divided into the PCM and non-PCM groups. En bloc resection, procedure time, discontinuation, and complications were analyzed between these 2 groups. Results Among all 1000 ESDs, severe fibrosis and discontinuation rates were 12.0 % (120 cases) and 1.8 % (18 cases), respectively. Regarding the comparison between cases with severe fibrosis and with no severe fibrosis, there were significant differences about en bloc resection rate (78.3 % vs. 95.7 %, P < 0.001), discontinuance rate (12.5 % vs. 0.3 %, P < 0.001), and perforation rate (8.3 % vs. 2.6 %, P = 0.001). Among the 120 cases with severe fibrosis, 21 and 99 cases were in the PCM and non-PCM groups, respectively. The PCM group had a higher en bloc resection rate (95.2 vs. 74.7, P =  0.03), a shorter mean procedure time (min) (79.6 ± 26.5 vs. 118.8 ± 71.0, P = 0.001), and no cases of discontinuation. An analysis of the interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of severe fibrosis among the 3 endoscopists showed kappa values of > 0.6. Conclusions In cases with severe fibrosis, the PCM with ESD improved en bloc resection rates and shortened the procedure time compared to the conventional non-PCM method. Additionally, the PCM reduced the discontinuation rate.

scholarly journals Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: predictors and neoplasm-related gradients of difficulty

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (09) ◽  
pp. E839-E846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Iacopini ◽  
Yutaka Saito ◽  
Antonino Bella ◽  
Takuji Gotoda ◽  
Patrizia Rigato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Model ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Sessile Polyp ◽  
Operator Experience ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background and study aim The role of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is standardized in Japan and East Asia, but technical difficulties hinder its diffusion. The aim was to identify predictors of difficulty for each neoplasm type. Methods A competent operator performed all procedures. ESD difficulty was defined as: en bloc with a slow speed (< 0.07 cm2/min; 30 × 30 mm neoplasm in > 90 min), conversion to endoscopic mucosal resection, or resection abandonment. Pre- and intraoperative difficulty variables were defined according to standard criteria, and evaluated separately for the rectum and colon. Difficulty predictors and gradients were evaluated by the multivariate logistic regression model. Results A total of 140 ESDs were included: 110 in the colon and 30 in the rectum. Neoplasms were laterally spreading tumors – granular type (LST-G) in 85 cases (61 %); the median longer axis was 30 mm (range 15 – 180 mm); a scar was present in 15 cases (11 %). ESD en bloc resection and difficulty rates were 85 % (n = 94) and 35 % (n = 39) in the colon, and 73 % (n = 22) and 50 % (n = 15) in the rectum (P = 0.17 and 0.28, respectively). The scar was the only preoperative predictor of difficulty in the rectum (odds ratio [OR] 12.3, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.27 – 118.36), whereas predictors in the colon were: scar (OR 12.7, 95 %CI 1.15 – 139.24), LST – nongranular type (NG) (OR 10.5, 95 %CI 1.20 – 55.14), and sessile polyp morphology (OR 3.1, 95 %CI 1.18 – 10.39). Size > 7 – ≤ 12 cm2 (OR 0.20, 95 %CI 0.06 – 0.74) and operator experience > 120 procedures (OR 0.19, 95 %CI 0.04 – 0.81) were predictors for a easy procedure. No intraoperative predictors of difficulty were identified in the rectum, whereas predictors in the colon were: severe submucosal fibrosis (OR 21.9, 95 %CI 2.11 – 225.64), ineffective submucosal exposure by gravity countertraction (OR 12.3, 95 %CI 2.43 – 62.08), and perpendicular submucosal dissection approach (OR 5.2, 95 %CI 1.07 – 25.03). When experience was /= 90, preoperative gradient of colonic ESD difficulty was the highest for LST-NGs (scar positive and negative up to 47 % and 20 %, respectively), intermediate for sessile polyps with scar (up to 23 %), and the lowest for LST-Gs (< 8 %). Different difficulty gradients between neoplasm types persisted with increasing experience: LST-NG rate up to 14 % after 120 procedures. Conclusions Colonic and rectal ESD difficulty has qualitative differences. Preoperative predictors should be considered to identify the difficulty gradient of each neoplasm type and the appropriate setting for ESD.

scholarly journals Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial cecal tumors: a comparison between extension and nonextension into the appendiceal orifice

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175628481877279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuki Boda ◽  
Shiro Oka ◽  
Shinji Tanaka ◽  
Hidenori Tanaka ◽  
Kenta Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Clinicopathological Characteristics ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Few studies have investigated the use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for cecal tumors extending into the appendiceal orifice. Herein, we assessed the feasibility and safety of ESD for cecal tumors extending into the appendiceal orifice. Methods: We retrospectively examined the outcomes of ESD for 78 patients with 78 cecal tumors (male/female ratio, 40/38; mean [standard deviation, SD] age, 67 [9] years; mean [SD] tumor size, 32 [15] mm), who underwent ESD at the Hiroshima University Hospital between October 2008 and March 2016. The indication for ESD in cecal tumors extending into the appendiceal orifice was recognition of the distal edge of the lesion in the appendix. They were classified into two groups: patients with cecal tumors extending (Group A: 29 patients, 29 tumors) and not extending (Group B: 49 patients, 49 tumors) into the appendiceal orifice. We compared the outcomes of ESD between both groups. Results: No significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics were observed between both groups. The rate of severe submucosal fibrosis in Group A (48%) was significantly higher than that in Group B (24%) ( p < 0.05). The mean (SD) procedure speed in Group A (14 [10] mm2/min) was significantly slower than that in Group B (23 [16] mm2/min) ( p < 0.01). The en bloc resection rates in Groups A and B were 90% and 96%, respectively. There were no significant differences in adverse events reported between both groups. Conclusions: ESD for cecal tumors with extension into the appendiceal orifice is effective and safe.

scholarly journals A new traction method (traction ring) for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyuan Huang ◽  
Hui-Hong Zhai ◽  
Ming Ji ◽  
Peng Li ◽  
Yinglin Niu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Traction System

Abstract Background Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a challenging operation because it is often difficult to attain good visualization of the submucosal layer. Lots of traction methods have been developed to facilitate submucosal dissection, but still not widely applied. Therefore, we designed a new traction device "traction ring". This pilot study is to evaluate if traction ring is feasible and safe for colorectal ESD. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 20 patients with colorectal lesions who had undergone traction ring assisted ESD. The main outcome was the rate of en bloc resection, R0 resection rate, procedure time, resection time, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results The median procedure time was 74.5 min (range 35–269 min.). The median resection time was 55 min (range 25–209 min.). The application of the traction system accounting for only 2.7% of the whole procedure time. Rate of en bloc resection was 95% (19/20). Rate of R0 resections was 90% (18/20). All traction rings were successfully settled and retrieved. No serious excessive intraoperative bleeding was observed. One patient was found perforation after treatment, no further intervention was required. No delayed complications were observed within one month after the operation. Conclusions This retrospective study demonstrated that the new countertraction method (traction ring) may become a safe, effective and simple way to assist ESD for colorectal lesions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document