Hepatische Ruhe-/Stress-Perfusion

Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-14
Author(s):  
T. Pezel ◽  
P. Garot ◽  
M. Kinnel ◽  
V. Landon ◽  
T. Hovasse ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemie Stege Bojer ◽  
Martin Heyn Sørensen ◽  
Niels Vejlstrup ◽  
Jens P. Goetze ◽  
Peter Gæde ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) have described localised non-ischemic late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) lesions of prognostic importance in various non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. Ischemic LGE lesions are prevalent in diabetes (DM), but non-ischemic LGE lesions have not previously been described or systematically studied in DM. Methods 296 patients with type 2 DM (T2DM) and 25 sex-matched control subjects underwent echocardiography and CMR including adenosine-stress perfusion, T1-mapping and LGE. Results 264 patients and all control subjects completed the CMR protocol. 78.4% of patients with T2DM had no LGE lesions; 11.0% had ischemic LGE lesions only; 9.5% had non-ischemic LGE lesions only; and 1.1% had both one ischemic and one non-ischemic lesion. The non-ischemic LGE lesions were situated mid-myocardial in the basal lateral or the basal inferolateral part of the left ventricle and the affected segments showed normal to high wall thickness and normal contraction. Patients with non-ischemic LGE lesions in comparison with patients without LGE lesions had increased myocardial mass (150 ± 34 vs. 133 ± 33 g, P = 0.02), average E/e’(9.9 IQR8.7–12.6 vs. 8.8 IQR7.4–10.7, P = 0.04), left atrial maximal volume (102 IQR84.6–115.2 vs. 91 IQR75.2–100.0 mL, P = 0.049), NT-proBNP (8.9 IQR5.9–19.7 vs. 5.9 IQR5.9–10.1 µmol/L, P = 0.02) and high-sensitive troponin (15.6 IQR13.0–26.1 vs. 13.0 IQR13.0–14.6 ng/L, P = 0.007) and a higher prevalence of retinopathy (48 vs. 25%, P = 0.009) and autonomic neuropathy (52 vs. 30.5%, P = 0.005). Conclusion A specific LGE pattern with lesions in the basal lateral or the basal inferolateral part of the left ventricle was found in patients with type 2 diabetes. Trial registrationhttps://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02684331.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Khedr Abdelaty ◽  
C Budgeon ◽  
G.S Gulsin ◽  
S Hetherington ◽  
K Khunti ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Chronic total coronary artery occlusions (CTOs) are present in approximately 20–30% of patients undergoing invasive angiography. Despite their prevalence, the optimum management strategy of CTOs remains uncertain. A potential limitation in published trials of CTO revascularisation is their failure to incorporate systematic assessment of ischaemia/viability in informing revascularisation decisions. Aim We sought to determine the prognostic utility of ischaemia/viability assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in a large, contemporaneous, real-world CTO population. Methods We retrospectively studied consecutive adult patients with≥1angiographically identified CTO who were referred for clinical CMR imaging during a consecutive 8-year period in our centre (2010–2018). Multi-parametric CMR comprised functional assessment, adenosine-stress perfusion and scar imaging. For perfusion assessment, images were analysed qualitatively with a concurrent examination of scar images. Myocardial segments were assigned to CTO or non-CTO territories according to standard criteria, taking into account coronary dominance. Significant ischaemia was defined as ≥10% and/or ≥2 contiguous myocardial segments with hibernation. Angiographic collateral flow to the CTO territory was graded using the Rentrop classification and the Collateral Connection (CC) Score. Significant CAD in non-CTO vessels was defined angiographically as ≥50% stenosis in any epicardial coronary artery/branch with diameter ≥2mm. The composite clinical endpoint comprised all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and heart failure hospitalisation. Results From a total of 27,201 invasive angiograms performed during the study period, 389 patients were diagnosed with CTO and underwent CMR imaging (mean age 65.0±11.0 years, 84% male). CTO was present most frequently in the right coronary artery (59% of subjects, 229/389), with left circumflex (LCx) artery involvement in 29% (112/389) and left anterior descending (LAD) artery in 29% (111/389). Collaterals with CC grade ≥2 were identified in 186 subjects (48%), and Rentrop score ≥2 in 300 (77%). Significant ischaemia was present in 61% of patients, and infarction in 71% (median infarction 8.6% [interquartile range (IQR) 4.5–14.1]. With a median follow-up time of 3.30 years [IQR 0.04–8.64], 65 (17%) met the composite endpoint. On multivariate analysis, neither significant ischaemia nor infarction was associated with the composite endpoint. However, non-CTO territory ischaemia was independently predictive of adverse outcome (hazard ratio 1.93; 95% CI 1.16–3.21; p=0.0113). Conclusion CTO-territory ischaemia and infarction are not predictive of adverse clinical outcome, challenging the assertion that CTO revascularisation may be guided by ischaemia assessment. The finding that non-CTO territory ischaemia is associated with adverse cardiovascular events warrants further investigation. Kaplan-Meier curves_CTO Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Franks ◽  
R Holtackers ◽  
M Nazir ◽  
S Plein ◽  
A Chiribiri

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation Background In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), increasing myocardial ischaemic burden (MIB) is a strong predictor of adverse events. When measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), a MIB ≥12.5% is considered significant and often used as a threshold to guide revascularisation. Ischaemic scar can cause stress perfusion defects which do not represent ischaemia and should be excluded from the MIB calculation. Conventional bright-blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is able to identify ischaemic scar but can suffer from poor scar-to-blood contrast, making accurate assessment of scar volume difficult. Dark-blood LGE methods increase scar-to-blood contrast and improve scar conspicuity which may impact the calculated scar burden and consequently the estimation of MIB when read in conjunction with perfusion images. Purpose To evaluate the impact of dark-blood LGE versus conventional bright-blood LGE on the estimation of MIB in patients with CAD. Methods 37 patients with suspected or known CAD who had evidence of CMR stress perfusion defects and ischaemic scar on LGE imaging were recruited. Patients underwent adenosine stress perfusion imaging followed by dark-blood LGE then conventional bright-blood LGE imaging at 3T. For dark-blood LGE, phase sensitive inversion recovery imaging with a shorter inversion time to null the LV blood-pool was used without any additional magnetization preparation. For each patient, three short-axis LGE slices were selected to match the three perfusion slice locations. Images were anonymised and analysed in random order. Ischaemic scar burden (ISB) was quantified for both LGE methods using a threshold >5 standard deviations above remote myocardium. Perfusion defect burden (PDB) was quantified by manual contouring of perfusion defects. MIB was calculated by subtracting the ISB from the PDB. Results MIB calculated using dark-blood LGE was 19% less compared to bright-blood LGE (15.7 ± 15.2% vs 19.4 ± 15.2%, p < 0.001). There was a strong positive correlation between the two LGE methods (rs = 0.960, p < 0.001, Figure 1A). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a significant fixed bias (mean bias = -3.6%, bias 95% CI: -2.6 to -4.7%, 95% limits of agreement: -9.8 to 2.5%) with no proportional bias (Figure 1B). MIB was calculated ≥12.5% and <12.5% by both LGE methods in 19 (51%) and 12 (32%) patients respectively. In 6 patients (16%), MIB was ≥12.5% using bright-blood LGE and <12.5% using dark-blood LGE (Figure 1A – orange data points). Overall, when used to classify MIB as <12.5% or ≥12.5%, there was only substantial agreement between the two LGE methods (κ=0.67, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.90). Conclusions The use of dark-blood LGE in conjunction with perfusion imaging results in a lower estimate of MIB compared to conventional bright-blood LGE. This can cause disagreement around the threshold of clinically significant ischaemia which could impact clinical management in patients being considered for coronary revascularisation. Abstract Figure. Linear regression with corresponding B&A


2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (14) ◽  
pp. E793
Author(s):  
Stefano Sdringola-Maranga ◽  
Nils P. Johnson ◽  
Richard L. Kirkeeide ◽  
Hemang A. Vaniya ◽  
Emma Cid ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document