Endoscopic Submucosal Resection (ESR) - a technique using novel devices for incision and resection of neoplastic lesions

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Metter ◽  
Patrick Aepli ◽  
Franz Ludwig Dumoulin ◽  
Bu'Hussain Hayee ◽  
Karl-Ernst Grund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Technical Difficulty ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Resection ◽  
Mucosal Incision ◽  
Submucosal Resection ◽  
Novel Devices

Background and study aims: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are established techniques for the treatment of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasia. Limitations of EMR are the low en bloc resection rates for larger lesions resulting in frequent recurrences. Major disadvantages of ESD are technical difficulty and long procedure times. Here, we evaluated technical feasibility and safety of newly designed devices to perform en bloc resection of lesions sized between ca. 20-40 mm. The method will be referred to as Endoscopic Submucosal Resection (ESR). Patients and methods: This case series included 93 lesions from different localizations (11x stomach, 25x colon, 57x rectum) with a median size of 29 (10-70) mm. ESR was carried out with two novel instruments for circumferential mucosal incision and for deep submucosal resection. Results: Resection by ESR was feasible in all cases. En bloc and R0 rates were insufficient when ESR was attempted without prior circumferential mucosal incision. However, en bloc and R0 resection rates were 70% and 63%, respectively when mucosal incision was done before application of the device for submucosal resection. We observed 3 complications (2 delayed bleedings, one microperforation) but no case of emergency surgery and no 30-day mortality. Conclusions: The series demonstrates feasibility and excellent safety of ESR using two novel devices for en bloc resection of early gastrointestinal neoplasia. The technique holds the promise of relative technical ease combined with high efficacy.

scholarly journals High proficiency of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe thanks to countertraction strategy using a double clip and rubber band

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (09) ◽  
pp. E1166-E1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérémie Jacques ◽  
Aurélie Charissoux ◽  
Pierre Bordillon ◽  
Romain Legros ◽  
Jérôme Rivory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Rubber Band ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Control Group ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc

Abstract Background and study aims ESD in the colon is more challenging technically than in other locations. Here, we report the first comparative case series of colon ESD using a systematic countertraction strategy using two clips and a rubber band. Patients and methods Retrospective comparative study of classic versus countertraction colon ESD performed in colon ESD cases collected prospectively at Lyon Edouard Herriot Hospital and Limoges University Hospital from January 2016 until December 2017. Results The study included 192 cases (control = 76, countertraction = 116). Countertraction using the double clip and rubber band technique versus the control group resulted in a significant decrease in the procedure time (94.7 vs. 117 min; P = 0.004) and significant increases in procedure speed (28.2 vs. 16.7 mm2/min; P < 0.0001), en bloc resection rate (95.7 % vs. 76.3 %, P < 0.0001), and R0 resection rate (78.5 % vs. 64.5 %, P = 0.04).At an individual operator point of view, results varied between operators but the double clip countertraction strategy significantly increased the en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and speed of dissection for each of the 4 operators. Conclusion Systematic countertraction using a double clip and rubber band facilitates colon ESD. This strategy should become the standard for colon ESD.

scholarly journals Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neoplastic lesions: experience from a European center.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Spychalski ◽  
Marcin Włodarczyk ◽  
Jakub Włodarczyk ◽  
Igor Dąbrowski ◽  
Piotr Bednarski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Case Series ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Rectal Tumors ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Case Series Study

IntroductionNowadays, various endoscopic resections including polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are well known first-line approaches for early neoplastic rectal tumors.Material and methodsIn this case series study, we analyzed 320 ESD procedures performed in a high-volume colorectal center in Poland, Europe. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate ESD procedure in cases of rectal carcinoma performed by a single trained operator in a referral center provided with endoscopy.ResultsOverall, en bloc resection was observed in 92.5% of patients (296/320). The en bloc resection rate was at a similar level in those lesions with involved anal sphincters versus tumors without involvement (93.85% vs. 92.16%; p=0.644). R0 resection was noted in 89.4% of patients (286/320). The overall curative ESD rate was 85.94% (n=275). The curative ESD rate in the invasive cancer group reached 52.6% (n=20). We observed ESD-related adverse events, such as bleeding and perforation, in 3.4 % of patients (n=11).ConclusionsWe have demonstrated that ESD in rectal tumors is an efficient and safe procedure with a high curative rate, even in difficult lesions. Anal sphincter localization and recurrent character of the lesion have no impact on the final outcomes. The ESD approach should have been considered for all rectal tumors, especially those lesions suspected of superficial mucosal invasion, as it can serve as a staging method and may have been curative for adenomas and cancers limited to mucosa.

scholarly journals Endoscopic submucosal dissection: How to be more efficient?

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (11) ◽  
pp. E1720-E1730
Author(s):  
Thomas Lambin ◽  
Jérôme Rivory ◽  
Timothée Wallenhorst ◽  
Romain Legros ◽  
Frédéric Monzy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Injection Technique ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Repeated Injection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Safety Margins ◽  
Mucosal Incision

AbstractEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows an “en bloc” resection with safety margins (R0 resection) regardless of the size of the lesion. However, while R0 brings a real benefit for the patient, it is not considered sufficient by many experts to justify the technical difficulties and the longer procedure time compared to piecemeal mucosectomy. The aims of this review are to provide several technical and strategical tips to help you save time and become comfortable during ESD procedures. ESD is divided into several intertwined phases: injection, incision, access to the submucosae, and submucosal dissection itself. During injection there are some mistakes that should not be made: a superficial injection, or on the contrary, a too deep injection. A good needle and good injection technique are mandatory. Some techniques, such as repeated injection or prolonged lifting solution, can help maintain the lift. After this step, mucosal incision can be made, taking care to have a good margin to allow an R0 resection. Starting the mucosal incision from a small point allows calibration of the depth of the incision and then obtaining a nice incision. Trimming is also very important to widen submucosal access. Then comes the submucosal dissection itself. Strategies such as the tunnel strategy or the pocket creation method can help to facilitate dissection, but more importantly, traction systems have become unavoidable, especially in the stomach and colon. Most common complications are bleeding and perforation, and they usually can be managed endoscopically.

scholarly journals Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with single clip traction: a feasibility study

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (05) ◽  
pp. E653-E658
Author(s):  
Tatsuma Nomura ◽  
Yoshikazu Hayashi ◽  
Takaaki Morikawa ◽  
Masahiro Okada ◽  
Hisashi Fukuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Major Axis ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Mucosal Incision ◽  
Axis Length ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background and study aims The pocket-creation method (PCM) facilitates dissection of the central part of a tumor. We previously developed the PCM with clip traction (PCM-CT) to facilitate opening the mucosal pocket, which otherwise could become cumbersome. In the present study, we aimed to examine the feasibility of PCM-CT for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Patients and methods PCM-CT was performed on 30 patients with early colorectal tumors from October 2019 to April 2020. PCM-CT allows efficient opening of the mucosal pocket by using the PCM to dissect the center of the lesion and then apply traction with a single clip after making a circumferential mucosal incision. Results The median specimen major axis length, ESD time, ESD speed, and en bloc resection rate were 48 mm, 84 minutes, 20 mm2/min, and 100 % (30/30), respectively. The success rates for the traction clip and median single-clip-traction time were 100 % (30/30) and 1.5 minutes, respectively. Conclusions Colorectal ESD using PCM-CT is a simple and promising method.

scholarly journals Long-term follow-up after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in 182 cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. E258-E262
Author(s):  
Christian Suchy ◽  
Moritz Berger ◽  
Ingo Steinbrück ◽  
Tsuneo Oyama ◽  
Naohisa Yahagi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Background and study aims We previously reported a case series of our first 182 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (ESDs). In the initial series, 155 ESDs had been technically feasible, with 137 en bloc resections and 97 en bloc resections with free margins (R0). Here, we present long-term follow-up data, with particular emphasis on cases where either en bloc resection was not achieved or en bloc resection resulted in positive margins (R1). Patients and methods Between September 2012 and October 2015, we performed 182 consecutive ESD procedures in 178 patients (median size 41.0 ± 17.4 mm; localization rectum vs. proximal rectum 63 vs. 119). Data on follow-up were obtained from our endoscopy database and from referring physicians. Results Of the initial cohort, 11 patients underwent surgery; follow-up data were available for 141 of the remaining 171 cases (82,5 %) with a median follow-up of 2.43 years (range 0.15–6.53). Recurrent adenoma was observed in 8 patients (n = 2 after margin positive en bloc ESD; n = 6 after fragmented resection). Recurrence rates were lower after en bloc resection, irrespective of involved margins (1.8 vs. 18,2 %; P < 0.01). All recurrences were low-grade adenomas and could be managed endoscopically. Conclusions The rate of recurrence is low after en bloc ESD, in particular if a one-piece resection can be achieved. Recurrence after fragmented resection is comparable to published data on piecemeal mucosal resection.

scholarly journals Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias: outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in Europe

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (11) ◽  
pp. E1340-E1348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl-Fredrik Rönnow ◽  
Noriya Uedo ◽  
Ervin Toth ◽  
Henrik Thorlacius
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasia ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
High Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Immediate Bleeding

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows en bloc resection of large colorectal lesions but ESD experience is limited outside Asia. This study evaluated implementation of ESD in the treatment of colorectal neoplasia in a Western center. Patients and methods Three hundred and one cases of colorectal ESD (173 rectal and 128 colonic lesions) were retrospectively evaluated in terms of outcome, learning curve and complications. Results Median size was 4 cm (range 1 – 12.5). En bloc resection was achieved in 241 cases amounting to an en bloc resection rate of 80 %. R0 resection was accomplished in 207 cases (69 %), RX and R1 were attained in 83 (27 %) and 11 (4 %) cases, respectively. Median time was 98 min (range 10 – 588) and median proficiency was 7.2 cm2/h. Complications occurred in 24 patients (8 %) divided into 12 immediate perforations, five delayed perforations, one immediate bleeding and six delayed bleedings. Six patients (2 %), all with proximal lesions, had emergency surgery. Two hundred and four patients were followed up endoscopically and median follow-up time was 13 months (range 3 – 53) revealing seven recurrences (3 %). En bloc rate improved gradually from 60 % during the first period to 98 % during the last period. ESD proficiency significantly improved between the first study period (3.6 cm2/h) and the last study period (10.8 cm2/h). Conclusions This study represents the largest material on colorectal ESD in the west and shows that colorectal ESD can be implemented in clinical routine in western countries after appropriate training and achieve a high rate of en bloc and R0 resection with a concomitant low incidence of complications. ESD of proximal colonic lesions should be attempted with caution during the learning curve because of higher risk of complications.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Visible Dysplasia Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: Cases Series and Systematic Review of Literature

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Manta ◽  
Angelo Zullo ◽  
Donato Alessandro Telesca ◽  
Danilo Castellani ◽  
Ugo Germani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Pooled Data ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions

Abstract Background and Aims Ulcerative colitis [UC] patients are at an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer due to chronic inflammation. Endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD] allows removal of non-invasive neoplastic lesions in the colon, but few data are available on its efficacy in UC patients. Methods Data from consecutive UC patients diagnosed with visible dysplastic lesions in the colon who underwent ESD were evaluated. The en bloc removal, R0 resection and complication rates were calculated. Local recurrence and metachronous lesions during follow-up were identified. A systematic review of the literature with pooled data analysis was performed. Results A total of 53 UC patients [age: 65 years; range 30–74; M/F: 31/22] underwent ESD. The en bloc resection rate was 100%, and the R0 resection rate was 96.2%. Bleeding occurred in seven [13.2%] patients, and perforation in three [5.6%] cases, all treated at endoscopy. No recurrence was observed, but two metachronous lesions were detected. Data from six other studies [three Asian and three European] were available. By pooling data, en bloc resection was successful in 88.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 83.5–92) of 216 lesions and in 91.8% [95% CI = 87.3–94.8] of 208 patients. R0 resection was achieved in 169 ESDs, equivalent to a 78.2% [95% CI = 72.3–83.2] rate for lesions and 81.3% [95% CI = 75.4–86] rate for patients. No difference between European and Asian series was noted. Conclusions This pooled data analysis indicated that ESD is a suitable tool for safely and properly removing non-invasive neoplastic lesions on colonic mucosa of selected UC patients.

Efficacy of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection with full or partial circumferential incision using a snare tip for difficult colorectal lesions

Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (09) ◽  
pp. 871-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naohisa Yoshida ◽  
Ken Inoue ◽  
Osamu Dohi ◽  
Ritsu Yasuda ◽  
Ryohei Hirose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
Benign Lesions ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Therapeutic Outcomes ◽  
Mucosal Incision

Abstract Background We analyzed the efficacy of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), which is a method of making a full or partial circumferential mucosal incision around a tumor with a snare tip for en bloc resection. Methods We reviewed cases from 2011 to 2018 in which precutting EMR (n = 167) and standard EMR (n = 557) were performed for lesions of 10 – 30 mm. Precutting EMR was indicated for benign lesions of 20 – 30 mm or lesions of < 20 mm for which standard EMR was difficult. Through propensity score matching of the two groups, the therapeutic outcomes for 35 lesions of ≥ 20 mm and 98 lesions of < 20 mm in each group were analyzed. Results In the two sizes of lesion, there were significant differences between the precutting and standard groups in the en bloc resection rate (≥ 20 mm 88.6 % vs. 48.5 %, P < 0.001; < 20 mm 98.0 % vs. 85.7 %, P = 0.004) and the histological complete resection rate (≥ 20 mm 71.4 % vs. 42.9 %, P = 0.02; < 20 mm 87.8 % vs. 67.3 %, P < 0.001). Conclusion Precutting EMR enabled high en bloc resection rates in cases involving difficult lesions.

Short-term outcomes following endoscopic submucosal dissection of large protruding colorectal neoplasms

Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (06) ◽  
pp. 606-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taku Sakamoto ◽  
Yutaka Saito ◽  
Fumihiko Nakamura ◽  
Seiichiro Abe ◽  
Hiroyuki Takamaru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasms ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Technical Difficulty ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Short Term ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background Although submucosal dissection is useful for treating laterally spreading colorectal tumors, there is little information regarding the endoscopic treatment of large protruding colorectal neoplasms. Here, we aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for protruding colorectal neoplasms ≥ 20 mm in diameter. Methods In total, 112 consecutive patients undergoing treatment between January 2005 and June 2017 were enrolled retrospectively. The study period was divided into six periods to evaluate any changes in outcomes over time. We reviewed all short-term clinical outcomes, including lesion characteristics, procedure time, and percentages of en bloc resection, curative resection, adverse events, and treatment discontinuation. Results The percentages of en bloc, en bloc R0, and en bloc curative resections were 88 %, 82 %, and 59 %, respectively. Perforation occurred in 11 patients (10 %), and the endoscopic procedure was discontinued in five patients (4 %) because of technical difficulty. For lesions ≥ 40 mm in diameter, the procedure time showed a statistically significant decreasing trend in the latter half of the study period. However, the rate of cure did not improve along with enhancements to the procedure’s technological aspects. Conclusions Although endoscopic submucosal dissection for large protruding lesions has advanced in terms of its technical aspects, its ability to cure large protruding neoplasms has not shown gratifying results.

scholarly journals Multi-loop traction device facilitates gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: ex vivo pilot study and an inaugural clinical experience

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Matsui ◽  
Naoto Tamai ◽  
Toshiki Futakuchi ◽  
Shunsuke Kamba ◽  
Akira Dobashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Traction Device

Abstract Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically difficult and requires considerable training. The authors have developed a multi-loop traction device (MLTD), a new traction device that offers easy attachment and detachment. We aimed to evaluate the utility of MLTD in ESD. Methods This ex vivo pilot study was a prospective, block-randomized, comparative study of a porcine stomach model. Twenty-four lesions were assigned to a group that undertook ESD using the MLTD (M-ESD group) and a group that undertook conventional ESD (C-ESD group) to compare the speed of submucosal dissection. In addition, the data of consecutive 10 patients with eleven gastric lesions was collected using electronic medical records to clarify the inaugural clinical outcomes of gastric ESD using MLTD. Results The median (interquartile range) speed of submucosal dissection in the M-ESD and C-ESD groups were 141.5 (60.9–177.6) mm2/min and 35.5 (20.8–52.3) mm2/min, respectively; submucosal dissection was significantly faster in the M-ESD group (p < 0.05). The rate of en bloc resection and R0 resection was 100% in both groups, and there were no perforation in either group. The MLTD attachment time was 2.5 ± 0.9 min and the MLTD extraction time was 1.0 ± 1.1 min. Clinical outcomes of MLTD in gastric ESD were almost the same as those of ex vivo pilot study. Conclusions MLTD increased the speed of submucosal dissection in ESD and was similarly effective when used by expert and trainee endoscopists without perforation. MLTD can potentially ensure a safer and faster ESD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document