Single-Center Outcome of Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

2013 ◽  
Vol 61 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Rüffer ◽  
F Münch ◽  
A Purbojo ◽  
O Toka ◽  
M Glöckler ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 039139882110160
Author(s):  
Kelsey L Browder ◽  
Ayesha Ather ◽  
Komal A Pandya

The objective of this study was to determine if propofol administration to veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients was associated with more incidents of oxygenator failure when compared to patients who did not receive propofol. This was a single center, retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome of the study is oxygenator exchanges per ECMO day in patients who received propofol versus those who did not receive propofol. Patients were 18 years or older on VV-ECMO support between January 1, 2015 and January 31, 2018. Patients were excluded if they required ECMO support for less than 48 h or greater than 21 days. There were five patients in the propofol arm that required oxygenator exchanges and seven patients in the control arm. The total number of oxygenator exchanges per ECMO day was not significantly different between groups ( p = 0.50). When comparing those who required an oxygenator exchange and those who did not, there was no difference in the cumulative dose of propofol received per ECMO hour (0.64 mg/kg/h vs 0.96 mg/kg/h; p = 0.16). Propofol use in patients on VV-ECMO does not appear to increase the number of oxygenator exchanges.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friedrich Reiterer ◽  
Elisabeth Resch ◽  
Michaela Haim ◽  
Ute Maurer-Fellbaum ◽  
Michael Riccabona ◽  
...  

Perfusion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 384-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginie Fouilloux ◽  
Célia Gran ◽  
Olivier Ghez ◽  
Caroline Chenu ◽  
Fedoua El Louali ◽  
...  

Objectives: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has become a gold standard in treatment of severe refractory circulatory and/or pulmonary failure. Those procedures require gathering of competences and material. Therefore, they are conducted in a limited number of reference centers. Emergent need for such treatments induces either hazardous transfers or a mobile pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation team able to remote implantation and transportation. The aim of this work is not to focus on pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation outcomes or indications, which have been extensively discussed in the literature. This study would like to detail the implementation, safety, and feasibility, even in a middle-size pediatric cardiac surgery reference center. Patients: This is a retrospective analysis of a series of patients initiated on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a peripheral center and transferred to a reference center. The data were collected from 10 consecutive years: from 2006 to 2016. Results: A total of 57 pediatric patients with a median weight of 6.00 (3.2-14.5) kg and median age of 2.89 (0.11-37.63) months were cannulated in peripheral center and transported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We did not experience any adverse event during transport. The outcomes were comparable to our literature-reported on-site extracorporeal membrane oxygenation series with 42 patients (74%) weaned from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and a 30-day survival of 60%. Neither patient’s age nor weight, indication for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or length of transport, was statistically significant in terms of outcomes. Conclusion: Offsite extracorporeal membrane oxygenation implantation and ground or air transport for pediatric patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation appeared to be safe when performed by a dedicated and experienced team, even within a mid-size center.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 833-842
Author(s):  
Marisa Passos Silva ◽  
Daniel Caeiro ◽  
Paula Fernandes ◽  
Cláudio Guerreiro ◽  
Eduardo Vilela ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document