scholarly journals Midterm Results of Four-Corner Fusion Using Dorsal Circular Plate Fixation

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 262-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Deglmann ◽  
Vanja Celigoj ◽  
Bernhard Lukas ◽  
Ahmed Elgammal
Keyword(s):  
Circular Plate ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Plate Removal ◽  
Level Ii ◽  
The Mean ◽  
K Wires

Purpose The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the results of four-corner fusion using dorsal circular plate. Methods We operated on 20 patients between 2009 and 2011. Results At a mean follow-up period of 30 months (range: 14–62, SD: 16), the mean VAS improved from 8 (range: 4–10, SD: 2) preoperatively to 4 (range: 0–8, SD: 2). Function measured with the DASH score improved from 37 (range: 10–75, SD: 18) to 26 (range: 2.5–64, SD: 19). Eighteen patients in our series showed full consolidation and two patients showed persistent nonunion. Three cases required plate removal due to dorsal impingement. Conclusion  Four-corner fusion using dorsal circular plate showed satisfactory results in this study, but it did not show superior results compared with simpler fixation methods mentioned in the literature, such as K-wires or screw fixation. Currently, we are principally using K-wires as a fixation method of choice in our four-corner fusion procedures. Level of Evidence  Level II.

Effect of Syndesmotic Implant Removal on Dorsiflexion

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 499-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Briceno ◽  
Timilien Wusu ◽  
Philip Kaiser ◽  
Patrick Cronin ◽  
Alyssa Leblanc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Final Analysis ◽  
Ankle Dorsiflexion ◽  
Implant Removal ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Level Ii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean

Background: There is limited evidence that syndesmotic implant removal (SIR) is beneficial. However, many surgeons advocate removal based on studies suggesting improved motion. Methodologic difficulties make the validity and applicability of previous works questionable. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ankle dorsiflexion after SIR using radiographically measured motion before and after screw removal utilizing a standardized load. Methods: All patients undergoing isolated SIR were candidates for inclusion. Dorsiflexion was measured radiographically: (1) immediately before implant removal intraoperatively, (2) immediately after removal intraoperatively, and (3) 3 months after removal. A standardized torque force was applied to the ankle and a perfect lateral radiograph of the ankle was obtained. Four reviewers independently measured dorsiflexion on randomized, deidentified images. A total of 29 patients met inclusion criteria. All syndesmotic injuries were associated with rotational ankle fractures. There were 11 men (38%) and 18 women (62%). The mean, and standard deviation, age was 50.3 ± 16.9 years (range 19-80). Results: The mean ankle dorsiflexion pre-operatively, post-operatively, and at a 3-month follow-up was 13.7 ± 6.6 degrees, 13.3 ± 7.3 degrees and 11.8 ± 11.3 degrees, respectively ( P = .466). For subsequent analysis, 5 patients were excluded because of the potential confounding effect of retained suture button devices. Analysis of the remaining 24 patients (and final analysis of 21 patients who had complete 3-month follow-up) demonstrated similar results with no statistically significant difference in ankle dorsiflexion at all 3 time points. Conclusion: Removal of syndesmotic screws may not improve ankle dorsiflexion motion and should not be used as the sole indication for screw removal. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective cohort study.

scholarly journals Capitolunate Arthrodesis versus Four-corner Arthrodesis in Scaphoin Nonunion Advanced Collapsed Wrist Treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (01) ◽  
pp. 032-038
Author(s):  
Sara Alicia González Porto ◽  
María Ángeles Cano Leira ◽  
Alba González Rodríguez ◽  
Ángel Álvarez Jorge
Keyword(s):  
Grip Strength ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Dorsal Plate ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Plate Removal ◽  
Ulnar Deviation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Dash Questionnaire

Objective To evaluate the outcomes of scaphoidectomy and capitolunate arthrodesis versus four-corner arthrodesis in patients with stage III scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrists. Methods We reviewed retrospectively all of the consecutive patients surgically treated in our center between 2007 and 2015, including 20 patients in the four-corner arthrodesis group and 11 patients in the capitolunate group. The mean follow-up time was of 47 months. The follow-up evaluation included wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, visual analogue scale (VAS), the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the Mayo wrist scale (MWS). Postoperative complications and the radiographic evaluation were also assessed. Results There was no statistical difference in flexion, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, grip strength, VAS, DASH or MWS scores. There was a statistically significant increase (6°) in extension in capitolunate arthrodesis versus four-corner arthrodesis, possibly without clinical relevance. There were two nonunions in the four-corner group, and none in the capitolunate group. None of the patients in the capitolunate group required screw removal. One patient in the four-corner group required dorsal plate removal. One patient in each group required conversion to total arthrodesis. Conclusions Capitolunate arthrodesis shows similar results in wrist ROM, grip strength and patient-reported outcomes when compared with four-corner arthrodesis at an average follow-up period of 4 years. We did not have any pisotriquetral arthritis in the capitolunate arthrodesis group, despite not removing the triquetrum in any of patients of this group. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Results of Internal Fixation of Olecranon Fracture: Comparative Study between Olecranon Plate and Screws Versus Tension Band and K Wires

2021 ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mahmoud Mohammed ◽  
Osama Elgebaly ◽  
Ahmed Samy ◽  
Mamdouh Lashin
Keyword(s):  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Tension Band ◽  
Olecranon Fracture ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Locked Plate ◽  
Improvement Rate ◽  
Group I ◽  
Pin Fixation ◽  
K Wires

Background: Olecranon fractures constitute a large proportion of injuries about the elbow. Several fracture patterns are recognized, with each pattern lending itself to a different treatment modality ranging from conservative treatment to fixation by different methods like tension band wiring, olecranon plate, intramedullary screw with or without tension band, and single Rush pin fixation. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the result of fixation of olecranon fracture tension band with K-wire and posterior olecranon special non locked plate fixation. Materials and Methods: This study included 30 patients, prospectively of simple olecranon fracture. Patients were randomly classified into two equal groups; group I was managed by tension band and K wires, while group I was managed by special non locked olecranon plate and screws. Results: No significant differences were found between both groups in DASH score, range of motion, improvement rate, radiological outcomes and return to previous activities. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between the two-fixation method regarding to DASH, ROM, radiological outcomes, and return to previous activity but rate of hardware removal was higher in tension band and K wires than posterior olecranon special non locked plate fixation.

Outcome of arthroscopic reduction association of the scapholunate joint

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Koehler ◽  
S. M. Guerra ◽  
J. M. Kim ◽  
S. Sakamoto ◽  
A. J. Lovy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Wrist Flexion ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Scapholunate Instability ◽  
Arthroscopic Reduction ◽  
Loss Of Reduction ◽  
The Mean

This study evaluates the arthroscopic reduction association scapholunate technique and outcomes. A total of 18 patients with chronic scapholunate instability with mean follow-up of 36 months were reviewed. Postoperatively, the mean visual analogue score was 2.5 and the mean DASH score was 8. The grip strength was 27 kg on the operative side compared with 32 kg on the uninjured side. The mean wrist flexion was 46° and extension was 56°. Seven patients had complications. Six patients had scapholunate joint widening, one had windshield-wipering of the screws with loss of reduction, and two demonstrated progression of scapholunate advanced collapse deformity. Four patients underwent revision surgeries: two revision arthroscopic reduction association scapholunates and two proximal row carpectomies. A preoperative scapholunate gap of greater than 5 mm and the presence of scapholunate advanced collapse Grade I were both predictive of a complication or revision surgery. Patients with a scapholunate gap of greater than 5 mm or scapholunate advanced collapse had statistically higher complications rates. Level of Evidence IV.

scholarly journals Temporary spanning plate across the elbow for complex fractures of the distal humerus

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashraf N. Moharram ◽  
Mostafa Mahmoud ◽  
Ahmed Lymona ◽  
Ahmed Afifi ◽  
Mostafa Ezzat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Distal Humerus ◽  
Open Reduction Internal Fixation ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Therapeutic Study

Abstract Background Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) is the gold standard management of fractures of the distal humerus. Stable fixation to allow early mobilization is not always possible in cases with comminuted fracture patterns and bone loss, with a high failure rate. We propose augmentation of internal fixation in these unstable situations with a spanning plate across the elbow to protect the fixation construct temporarily until bone union. Methods Eighteen patients with complex distal humeral fractures were managed with standard ORIF technique augmented with a temporary plate spanning across the elbow as an internal fixator. Cases included were either very distal, comminuted (6 cases) or insufficiency fractures (4 cases) or revision fixation cases (8 cases). The temporary spanning plate was removed as soon as signs of early radiographic union were detected. Results Seventeen patients were available for final follow up at a mean 28.3 months. The spanning plate was removed after 3.4 months on average. At the final follow-up, the mean elbow total arc of motion was 86.3°. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 80, and the mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) score was 27. Conclusion Spanning the elbow temporarily with a plate in adjunct to standard ORIF technique is both simple and effective in achieving fracture stability and union and minimizes failure rates after fixation of comminuted, very distal fractures, osteoporotic cases, or revision fixation cases with bone loss. Level of evidence Level IV, Therapeutic study

A novel plating technique for Ideberg type 1 A glenoid fractures: a report of five patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110018
Author(s):  
Sinan Oguzkaya ◽  
Jacobien van der Wijk ◽  
Alexander van Tongel ◽  
Joris Beckers ◽  
Tom van Isacker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Reduction ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Constant Murley Score ◽  
Uninjured Side ◽  
The Mean

Background Glenoid rim fractures are uncommon and generally associated with high complication rates. The most common treatment techniques include screw or anchor fixation. Here, we introduce a new fixation method to treat Ideberg type 1 A fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients treated with open reduction and plate fixation for Ideberg type 1 A fractures. The active range of motion capacity of both shoulders was recorded postoperatively. Constant-Murley score and Oxford disability index scores were used as outcome tools. Results Five patients (three men and two women) were evaluated; their mean age was 56 years (standard deviation (SD), 10 years). The mean follow-up period was 25 months (range, 6–69 months); all fractures healed radiologically during the follow-up period. The mean Constant-Murley score was 80.36 (SD 11.01); the mean Oxford disability index was 37 (SD 9). The subsequent flexion and external rotation of the injured shoulders were similar to those of the uninjured side (injured vs. uninjured side: flexion, 176 ± 5.4 vs. 178 ± 4.4; external rotation, 48 ± 10.9 vs. 60 ± 0). No patient showed signs of osteoarthritis, stiffness, instability, or chronic pain at the last follow-up. Discussion Open reduction and internal fixation with a plate is suitable for Ideberg type 1A glenoid fractures.

scholarly journals Dual Plate Fixation of Mason Type III and IV Radial Neck Fractures: a Mid-term Follow-up of 9 Cases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Ye ◽  
Hui Qin ◽  
Zhiquan An
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Radial Neck ◽  
Radial Neck Fractures ◽  
Dual Plate ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: Radial head and neck fractures commonly occur in elbow injuries. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the dual plate fixation technique for fractures of the radial neck.Methods: This prospective study included 9 patients who were referred to our department by trauma surgeons between July 2014 and March 2018. 8 patients had a Mason type III fracture, and 1 patient had a Mason type IV fracture. The functional outcomes of dual plate fixation were evaluated via the range of motion (ROM) of the elbow joint, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), and the Broberg and Morrey Index. Radiographic images were also reviewed during follow-up.Results: After a mean follow-up period of 50 months (24–69), the mean elbow flexion was 134°, extension was 5°, pronation was 76°, and the mean supination was 78°. The mean DASH score was 6.3. The mean MEPI was 97, and the mean Broberg and Morrey Index was 97. At the time of the last follow-up, the average humeroradial joint space was 2.5 mm, and the average inclination of the radial head relative to the neck was 2.2°. There were no incidences of wound infection, delayed union, nonunion of the fracture, or secondary displacement.Conclusions: Mason type III–IV radial neck fractures can be fixed using the dual plate technique with sufficient midterm results for both fractures that involve the radial head and those that do not. Trial registration: 2020-KY-096(K)

Effect of Fixation Type and Bone Graft on Tarsometatarsal Fusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1394-1402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Buda ◽  
Noortje Catharina Hagemeijer ◽  
Shaun Kink ◽  
Anne Holly Johnson ◽  
Daniel Guss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
The Impact

Background: End-stage tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthritis is commonly treated with arthrodesis of involved joints. Fixation hardware can consist of varying combinations of screws, plates, and staples with or without supplemental bone graft. There are limited data to demonstrate either superiority of a given fixation method or the impact of bone graft on fusion rates. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to determine whether nonunion rates after TMT arthrodesis were influenced by either the use of screw vs plate fixation or the addition of bone graft vs no bone graft. Methods: All patients older than 18 years undergoing arthrodesis for TMT arthritis between July 1991 and July 2016 were identified retrospectively. Exclusion criteria included less than 12 months follow-up, prior midfoot surgery, any added procedure beyond TMT arthrodesis using plates or screws, and acute foot trauma. All patients with radiographic or clinical nonunion, including those requiring revision surgery, were identified. Demographic data and associated risk factors were recorded via chart and radiographic image review. Eighty-eight patients (88 feet, mean follow-up: 75.1 ± 51.4; range, 12-179), with a total of 189 joints and who met enrollment criteria were treated by 9 different surgeons with arthrodesis. Results: The overall nonunion rate was 11.4%. Significant independent risk factors associated with nonunion were (1) arthrodesis using plate fixation with all screws through the plate (odds ratio [OR], 6.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-21.3; P = .004), (2) smoking during the perioperative period (OR, 7.9; 95% CI, 2.1-30.2; P = .002), and (3) postoperative nonanatomic alignment (OR, 11.2; 95% CI, 2.1-60.8; P = .005). Bone graft utilization was found to significantly lower the rate of nonunion (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.6; P = .006). Conclusion: Isolated plate fixation, smoking, and postoperative nonanatomic alignment appear to significantly increase the rate of nonunion among patients undergoing TMT arthrodesis for midfoot arthritis. Concomitant use of autogenous bone graft significantly decreased this risk. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Can Only Fix Sternoclavicular Joint to Treat Bipolar Clavicle Injury?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongxu Feng ◽  
Yong Liu ◽  
Zijun Li ◽  
Jie Huang ◽  
Mei Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Clavicle Fracture ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Recurrent Dislocation ◽  
Sternoclavicular Joint ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Distal Clavicle Fracture ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Internal Plate Fixation

Abstract Background: Owing to the rarity of bipolar clavicle injury, treatment remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to report treatment of bipolar clavicle injury with internal plate fixation.Methods: We present our experience of clavicle hook plating for sternoclavicular joint dislocation and anatomical plating for distal clavicle fracture for the treatment of three consecutive bipolar clavicle injuries with different injury patterns. At follow up, radiographs were assessed for joint congruity, fracture union, and implant failure. Clinical evaluation included Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Constant and Murley Score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and complications.Results：All patients had a minimum follow-up of six months. Each fracture had solid union, and each dislocation showed no sign of recurrent dislocation, the mean shoulder forward flexion was 153.3°±10.4°, the mean DASH score was 13.9±9.2 points. The mean Constant and Murley score was 82.3±12.3 points, and, the mean VAS score was 2.2±2.0 point. No complications were encountered, and each patient was highly satisfied with their treatments.Conclusion: Our experience of using internal plating for bipolar clavicle injury is positive, as it allows early mobilization and resulted in good joint function. Also, only sternoclavicular joint fixation might be sufficient for some part of bipolar clavicle injury, acromioclavicular joint fixation is not necessary unless residual instability existence.

Plate Fixation versus Percutaneous Pinning for Unstable Metacarpal Fractures: A Meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (01) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eitan Melamed ◽  
LiJin Joo ◽  
Edward Lin ◽  
Donato Perretta ◽  
John T. Capo
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Percutaneous Pinning ◽  
Metacarpal Fractures ◽  
Functional Scores

Background: Whether percutaneous pinning or plate fixation is more appropriate for metacarpal fractures is still open to debate. Our study purpose was to review the current literature in an attempt to determine the optimal treatment modality for metacarpal fractures on the basis of functional outcomes, radiographic outcome and rates of complications.Methods: We selected Pubmed, Cochrane library, EMBASE and the relevant English orthopedic journals and pooled data from eligible trials including four comparative studies and one retrospective review. Overall, the studies contained 222 patients with 231 fractures, 143 treated with pinning and 88 treated with plates and screws. Mean follow up was 7.5 months (4-12 months). Data were analyzed and the fixed effects are assumed for meta-analysis.Results: Patients undergoing pinning for metacarpal fractures have higher motion scores when compared to open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws. Functional scores, grip strength, radiographic parameters, time to union and complications were found not to be significantly different between the two groups.Conclusions: There is evidence to support the use of pins over ORIF with plates and screws in the treatment of metacarpal fractures. This may have practical advantages, including minimal dissection, easier insertion and availability of the pins. The limitations of this study include the small number of eligible studies, lack of reporting of standard deviation value, and the lack of DASH score assessments at follow up. Further randomized controlled trials that include a larger patient numbers with longer follow up are needed to substantiate the superiority of one fixation method over another.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document