Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Recurrence: High Negative Predictive Value of D-dimer Performed after Oral Anticoagulation Is Stopped

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (01) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Legnani ◽  
Benilde Cosmi ◽  
Giuliana Guazzaloca ◽  
Claudia Pancani ◽  
Sergio Coccheri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Recurrent Events ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryIn some patients with previous venous thromboembolism (VTE) D-dimer levels (D-Dimer) tend to increase after oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) is stopped. The aim of our study was to evaluate the predictive value of D-Dimer for the risk of VTE recurrence after OAT withdrawal. After a first episode of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), 396 patients (median age 67 years, 198 males) were followed from the day of OAT discontinuation for 21 months. D-dimer was measured on the day of OAT withdrawal (T1), 3-4 weeks (T2) and 3 months (+/− 10 days, T3) thereafter. The main outcome events of the study were: objectively documented recurrent DVT and/or PE. D-dimer was found to be increased in 15.5%, 40.3% and 46.2% of the patients at T1, T2 and T3, respectively. In 199 (50.2%) patients, D-dimer levels were elevated in at least one measurement. During a follow-up of 628.4 years, 40 recurrences were recorded (10.1% of patients; 6.4% patient-years of follow-up). D-dimer was increased in at least one measurement in 28 of these cases, but remained normal in 11 subjects (three of whom had recurrent events triggered by circumstantial factors, three with malignancyassociated factors) (in one subject D-dimer was not measured). The negative predictive value (NPV) of D-dimer was 95.6% (95% CI 91.6-98.1) at T3 and was even higher (96.7%; 95% CI 92.9-98.8) after exclusion of the six recurrences due to circumstantial factors. Only five idiopathic recurrences occurred in the 186 patients with consistently normal D-dimer. In conclusion, D-dimer has a high NPV for VTE recurrence when performed after OAT discontinuation.

D-Dimer Test and Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Comparative Study of 7 Assays

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (04) ◽  
pp. 518-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Elias ◽  
I Aptel ◽  
B Huc ◽  
J J Chale ◽  
F Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Latex Agglutination ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryThe current D-Dimer ELISA methods provide high sensitivity and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis but these methods are not suitable for emergency or for individual determination. We have evaluated the performance of 3 newly available fast D-Dimer assays (Vidas D-Di, BioMerieux; Instant IA D-Di, Stago; Nycocard D-Dimer, Nycomed) in comparison with 3 classic ELISA methods (Stago, Organon, Behring) and a Latex agglutination technique (Stago). One-hundred-and-seventy-one patients suspected of presenting a first episode of deep vein thrombosis were investigated. A deep vein thrombosis was detected in 75 patients (43.8%) by ultrasonic duplex scanning of the lower limbs; in 11 of them the thrombi were distal and very limited in size (<2 cm). We compared the performance of the tests by calculating their sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for different cut-off levels and by calculating the area under ROC curves. The concordance of the different methods was evaluated by calculating the kappa coefficient. The performances of the 3 classic ELISA and of the Vidas D-Di were comparable and kappa coefficients indicated a good concordance between the results provided by these assays. Their sensitivity slightly declined for detection of the very small thrombi. Instant IA D-Di had a non-significantly lower sensitivity and negative predictive value than the 4 previous assays; however its performance was excellent for out-patients. As expected, the Latex assay had too low a sensitivity and negative predictive value to be recommended. In our hands, Nycocard D-Dimer also exhibited low sensitivity and negative predictive value, which were significantly improved when the plasma samples were tested by the manufacturer. Thus significant progress has been made, allowing clinical studies to be planned to compare the safety and cost-effectiveness of D-Dimer strategy to those of the conventional methods for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis.

scholarly journals Residual Vein Thrombosis Echogenicity Is Associated to the Risk of DVT Recurrence: A Cohort Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 477-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna M. Mazetto ◽  
Fernanda L. A. Orsi ◽  
Sandra A. F. Silveira ◽  
Luis F. Bittar ◽  
Mariane M. C. Flores-Nascimento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Late Complication ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Predictive Markers ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

Although deep vein thrombosis (DVT) recurrence is a common late complication of the disease, there are few predictive markers to risk-stratify patients long-term after the thrombotic event. The accuracy of residual vein thrombosis (RVT) in this context is controversial, possibly due to a lack of a standardized methodology. The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of RVT echogenicity as a predictive marker of late DVT recurrence. To evaluate the accuracy of RVT echogenicity as a predictive marker of late DVT recurrence. This prospective study included patients with history of DVT in the past 33 months. Ultrasound examination was performed to detect the presence of RVT, and its echogenicity was determined by calculating the grayscale median (GSM) of the images. Blood samplings were taken for plasma D-dimer levels. Patients were followed-up for 28 months and the primary end point was DVT recurrence. Deep vein thrombosis recurrence was confirmed or excluded by ultrasound during the follow-up. Fifty-six patients were included, of which 10 presented DVT recurrence during the follow-up. D-dimer levels above 630 ng/mL conferred higher risk for recurrence with a negative predictive value of 94%. The absence of RVT was a protective marker for recurrence with a negative predictive value of 100%. Also, the presence of hypoechoic RVT, determined by GSM values below 24, positively predicted 75% of DVT recurrences. Our results suggest that the persistence of RVT and, particularly, the presence of hypoechoic thrombi (GSM < 24) are predictive markers of the risk of DVT recurrence. Residual vein thrombosis echogenicity, by GSM analysis, could represent a new strategy for the evaluation of recurrence risk in patients with DVT.

D-dimer levels in combination with residual venous obstruction and the risk of recurrence after anticoagulation withdrawal for a first idiopathic deep vein thrombosis

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (11) ◽  
pp. 969-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Legnani ◽  
Michela Cini ◽  
Giuliana Guazzaloca ◽  
Gualtiero Palareti ◽  
Benilde Cosmi
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Venous Obstruction ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryWe assessed the predictive value of D-dimer levels in combination with residual venous obstruction (RVO) for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in a prospective cohort of outpatients after oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) suspension for a first episode of idiopathic proximal deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs during a 2-year follow-up. Patients (n=400) were enrolled on the day of OAT suspension when RVO was determined by compression ultrasonography (present in 48.6% of patients). D-dimer (cut-off value: 500 ng/mL) was measured 30±10 days afterwards (abnormal in 56.4% of patients). The overall recurrence rate was 16.7% (67/400; 95% confidence intervals - CI -:13–21%). The multivariate hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence was 3.32 (95% CI:1.78–6.75; p > 0.0001) for abnormal D-dimer compared to normal D-dimer and 1.2 (95% CI:0.72–2.07; p>0.05) for RVO compared to absent RVO. The recurrence rate was 5.7% (95% CI:2–13%) and 10.4% (95% CI:6–18%), respectively, for normal D-dimer either without or with RVO, 22.9% (95% CI:14–33%) and 25.9% (95% CI: 18–35%), respectively, for abnormal D-dimer, either without or with RVO. When compared with normal D-dimer without RVO, the multivariate HR for recurrence was similar for abnormal D-dimer either with RVO (4.76 – 95% CI:1.78–12.8) or without RVO (4.3–95%:1.56–11.88). Abnormal D-dimer at one month after OAT withdrawal is an independent risk factor for recurrent VTE, while RVO at the time of OAT withdrawal, either with normal or abnormal D-dimer after one month, does not influence the risk of recurrence.

Reliable Rapid Blood Test for the Exclusion of Venous Thromboembolism in Symptomatic Outpatients

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (01) ◽  
pp. 009-011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franktien Turkstra ◽  
Edwin J R van Beek ◽  
Jan W ten Cate ◽  
Harry R Buller
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Academic Medical Centre ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryIn this study we assessed the reliability of a rapid bed-side whole blood D-dimer assay prospectively in patients with clinically suspected venous thromboembolism, referred to the Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam. In consecutive outpatients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism we measured the sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of the assay compared to the outcome of standard diagnostic tests and 3-month follow-up. A total of 234 patients were included; the prevalence of venous thromboembolism was 29%. A sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of 100% (95% Cl: 95% -100%), 58% (95% Cl: 50% - 65%) and 100% (95% Cl: 96% -100%), respectively, were obtained. The exclusion rate was 41% of all referred patients. Conclusion: The SimpliRED whole blood D-dimer assay appears to be a simple and reliable method for the exclusion of venous thromboembolism in symptomatic outpatients.

Evaluation of a New Rapid Quantitative D-dimer Assay in Patients with Clinically Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (03) ◽  
pp. 412-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armando D’Angelo ◽  
Gabriella D’Alessandro ◽  
Loredana Tomassini ◽  
Jean Louis Pittet ◽  
G Dupuy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Pretest Probability ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Baseline Testing ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryThe sensitivity and specificity for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of a new rapid, quantitative and precise (total imprecision < 10%) D-dimer assay suitable for individual measurements (VIDAS D-DIMER, bio-Merieux, France) were evaluated in a consecutive series of 103 in- and out-patients submitted to serial compression ultrasonography (C-US) for the clinical suspicion of DVT (n = 66) or of DVT recurrence (n = 37) and symptoms lasting from 1 to 15 days. DVT was found in 22 patients at baseline testing and no patient with an initially negative C-US developed vein incompressibility at follow up. The time elapsed from the onset of symptoms was negatively associated with D-dimer levels both in patients with and in those without DVT. In the entire series of patients, the sensitivity of a positive D-dimer test (≥1.0 Μg/ml) for the presence of DVT was 96% (21/22 patients, 95% confidence interval 75-100%) with a specificity of 75% (64-84%), a negative predictive value of 98% (90-100%), a positive predictive value of 51% (35-67%), and an overall accuracy of 80% (70-87%). A normal D-dimer value (0.22 Μg/ml) was observed in one patient with DVT and symptoms lasting from 15 days. The approach of withholding C-US testing in patients with symptoms lasting from less than 11 days and D-dimer levels below the cut-off value was compared to serial C-US testing alone in a cost-effectiveness analysis subdividing the 66 patients with a first episode according to their clinical pretest probability of DVT. Thrombosis was detected in 6.7% of the patients in the low probability group (n = 15), 16.7% of the patients in the moderate probability group (n = 24), 51.9% of the patients in the high probability group (n = 27) and 8.1% of patients with suspected DVT recurrence. Calculated cost-savings for each DVT diagnosed ranged from 5% in the high pretest probability group to 55% in the low pretest probability group and to 77% in patients with suspected DVT recurrence.The safety of avoiding C-US testing in symptomatic patients with a negative D-dimer test should be evaluated in clinical management studies.

Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis by Combination of Doppler Ultrasound Flow Examination and Strain Gauge Plethysmography

1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (02) ◽  
pp. 141-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Bounameaux ◽  
B Krähenbühl ◽  
S Vukanovic
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Strain Gauge ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Strain Gauge Plethysmography ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryDoppler ultrasound flow examination, strain gauge plethysmography and contrast venography were performed in 160 lower limbs of 80 in-patients. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was suspected in 87 limbs. Using measurement of venous stop-flow pressure, the Doppler method had an overall sensitivity of 83%. By combined use of Doppler and Plethysmography, sensitivity was increased to 96%. Specificity was 62% and 51%, respectively. With a positive and a negative predictive value of 80% and 73%, respectively, the combination of both non-invasive methods cannot reliably replace venography in the diagnosis of DTV, although all (40/40) thromboses proximal to or involving the popliteal segment were detected by either Doppler and Plethysmography or both.After exclusion of 14 patients (18%) suffering from conditions known to alter the results of these non-invasive methods, the positive predictive value of abnormal findings in both Doppler and Plethysmography was increased to 94% for suspected limbs, whilst negative predictive value of both negative Doppler and Plethysmography was 90%, allowing the avoidance of venography in these patients.

Negative predictive value of d-dimer for diagnosis of venous thromboembolism

2008 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Nomura ◽  
Hideo Wada ◽  
Toshiro Mizuno ◽  
Naoyuki Katayama ◽  
Yasunori Abe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
D Dimer

Evidence for Safe Exclusion of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) by a Rapid ELISA D-Dimeer Test at Cut-Off Levels of 500 and 1000 Ng/Ml in 1046 Consecutive Outpatients with Suspected DVT.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1059-1059
Author(s):  
Jan Jacques Michels ◽  
Jan Hermssen ◽  
Paul H. Trienekens
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Score ◽  
Large Prospective Study ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Persistent Symptoms ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer ◽  
Compression Ultrasonography

Abstract Introduction.A normal compression ultrasonography (CUS) safely excludes proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with a negative predictive value of 97% indicating the need to repeat CUS testing within one week. In 3 studies, the rapid ELISA D-dimer assay at a cut-off of 500 ng/ml did have a sensitivity of 100% for the exclusion of venographically documented distal and proximal DVT irrespective of clinical score. To test this hypothesis we performed a large prospective study in outpatients with suspected DVT. Methods. CUS and a rapid ELISA D-Dimer test (VIDAS, BioMérieux L’Etoile, France) were performed in patients with suspected DVT. A negative CUS with a D-Dimer result of <500 ng/ml exclude DVT, and with a D-Dimer result of >500 ng/ml was followed by a second CUS within one week. Results. The prevalence of DVT 1046 consecutive out patients with suspected DVT was 23,4%. The first CUS was positive in 228 with a rapid ELISA D-Dimer of >500 ng/ml in 227 and of <500 ng/ml in one case, indicating a sensitivity of 99,6% irrespective of clinical score. The first CUS was negative in 818. The rapid ELISA D-dimer test Was <500 ng/ml in 297 of which 296 had a negative first CUS indicating a negative predictive value of 99.7% at a specificity of 37% irrespective of the clinicl score. The negative predictive value of a negative CUS plus a rapid ELISA D-Dimer result of less than 1000 ng/ml is 99.5% at a specificity of 67,9% irrespective of clinical score. The prevalence of DVT in patients with negative first CUS and a ELISA D-Dimer of >1000 ng/ml was 5.6% as documented by CUS repeat within on week. Conclusion.A normal rapid ELISA D-dimer test, <500 ng/ml, in outpatients with suspected DVT safely excludes DVT irrespective of clinical score. After a negative rapid ELISA result (<500 ng/ml), CUS is still indicated for safety reasons in patients with suspected DVT and persistent symptoms in search for an alternative diagnosis, or for a rare case of DVT. A negative CUS plus and ELISA D-Dimer result of <1000 ng/ml safely exclude DVT without the need to repeat CUS in 2/3 of patients with a negative first CUS.

scholarly journals Performance of a New Fibrin Monomer Assay to Exclude Deep Vein Thrombosis in Symptomatic Outpatients

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (01) ◽  
pp. 50-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Caliezi ◽  
Nadja Fünfsinn ◽  
Thomas Mauron ◽  
Iris Baumgartner ◽  
Irmela Sulzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Fibrin Monomer ◽  
Objective Tests ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Accuracy Indices ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryIn this study we prospectively assessed the reliability of a new fibrin monomer assay in 106 outpatients with clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis of the lower limb. According to the results of the objective tests and using different cut-off points we calculated the sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of the fibrin monomer assay. The prevalence of deep vein thrombosis was 44.3% (31.1% proximal, 13.2% distal). Using a cut-off level of plasma fibrin monomer of 3.5 μg/ml, a sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 94-100%), 35.6% (95% CI: 23-48%) and 100% (95% CI: 86-100%), respectively, were obtained. The exclusion rate was 19.8% (95% CI: 12-27%) of all referred patients. These accuracy indices compared favourably with the respective results of a routine D-dimer ELISA used for comparison. Conclusion: This new fibrin monomer assay appears to be a reliable method for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients.

The value of 64-detector row computed tomography for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (05) ◽  
pp. 901-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio de Conti ◽  
Isabella Minotto ◽  
Lucia Filippi ◽  
Marta Mongiat ◽  
Daniele de Faveri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Diagnostic Strategy ◽  
Clinical Disorder ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Test Probability ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryRecently, a diagnostic strategy using a clinical decision rule, D-dimer testing and spiral computed tomography (CT) was found to be effective in the evaluation of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the rate of venous thromboembolic complications in the three-month follow-up of patients with negative CT was still substantial and included fatal events. It was the objective to evaluate the safety of withholding anticoagulants after a normal 64-detector row CT (64-DCT) scan from a cohort of patients with suspected PE. A total of 545 consecutive patients with clinically suspected first episode of PE and either likely pre-test probability of PE (using the simplified Wells score) or unlikely pre-test probability in combination with a positive D-dimer underwent a 64-DCT. 64-DCT scanning was inconclusive in nine patients (1.6%), confirmed the presence of PE in 169 (31%), and ruled out the diagnosis in the remaining 367. During the three-month follow-up of the 367 patients one developed symptomatic distal deep-vein thrombosis (0.27%; 95%CI, 0.0 to 1.51%) and none developed PE (0 %; 95%CI, 0 to 1.0%). We conclude that 64-DCT scanning has the potential to safely exclude the presence of PE virtually in all patients presenting with clinical suspicion of this clinical disorder.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document