Evaluation of a New Rapid Quantitative D-dimer Assay in Patients with Clinically Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (03) ◽  
pp. 412-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armando D’Angelo ◽  
Gabriella D’Alessandro ◽  
Loredana Tomassini ◽  
Jean Louis Pittet ◽  
G Dupuy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Pretest Probability ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Baseline Testing ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryThe sensitivity and specificity for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of a new rapid, quantitative and precise (total imprecision < 10%) D-dimer assay suitable for individual measurements (VIDAS D-DIMER, bio-Merieux, France) were evaluated in a consecutive series of 103 in- and out-patients submitted to serial compression ultrasonography (C-US) for the clinical suspicion of DVT (n = 66) or of DVT recurrence (n = 37) and symptoms lasting from 1 to 15 days. DVT was found in 22 patients at baseline testing and no patient with an initially negative C-US developed vein incompressibility at follow up. The time elapsed from the onset of symptoms was negatively associated with D-dimer levels both in patients with and in those without DVT. In the entire series of patients, the sensitivity of a positive D-dimer test (≥1.0 Μg/ml) for the presence of DVT was 96% (21/22 patients, 95% confidence interval 75-100%) with a specificity of 75% (64-84%), a negative predictive value of 98% (90-100%), a positive predictive value of 51% (35-67%), and an overall accuracy of 80% (70-87%). A normal D-dimer value (0.22 Μg/ml) was observed in one patient with DVT and symptoms lasting from 15 days. The approach of withholding C-US testing in patients with symptoms lasting from less than 11 days and D-dimer levels below the cut-off value was compared to serial C-US testing alone in a cost-effectiveness analysis subdividing the 66 patients with a first episode according to their clinical pretest probability of DVT. Thrombosis was detected in 6.7% of the patients in the low probability group (n = 15), 16.7% of the patients in the moderate probability group (n = 24), 51.9% of the patients in the high probability group (n = 27) and 8.1% of patients with suspected DVT recurrence. Calculated cost-savings for each DVT diagnosed ranged from 5% in the high pretest probability group to 55% in the low pretest probability group and to 77% in patients with suspected DVT recurrence.The safety of avoiding C-US testing in symptomatic patients with a negative D-dimer test should be evaluated in clinical management studies.

D-Dimer Test and Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Comparative Study of 7 Assays

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (04) ◽  
pp. 518-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Elias ◽  
I Aptel ◽  
B Huc ◽  
J J Chale ◽  
F Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Latex Agglutination ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryThe current D-Dimer ELISA methods provide high sensitivity and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis but these methods are not suitable for emergency or for individual determination. We have evaluated the performance of 3 newly available fast D-Dimer assays (Vidas D-Di, BioMerieux; Instant IA D-Di, Stago; Nycocard D-Dimer, Nycomed) in comparison with 3 classic ELISA methods (Stago, Organon, Behring) and a Latex agglutination technique (Stago). One-hundred-and-seventy-one patients suspected of presenting a first episode of deep vein thrombosis were investigated. A deep vein thrombosis was detected in 75 patients (43.8%) by ultrasonic duplex scanning of the lower limbs; in 11 of them the thrombi were distal and very limited in size (<2 cm). We compared the performance of the tests by calculating their sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for different cut-off levels and by calculating the area under ROC curves. The concordance of the different methods was evaluated by calculating the kappa coefficient. The performances of the 3 classic ELISA and of the Vidas D-Di were comparable and kappa coefficients indicated a good concordance between the results provided by these assays. Their sensitivity slightly declined for detection of the very small thrombi. Instant IA D-Di had a non-significantly lower sensitivity and negative predictive value than the 4 previous assays; however its performance was excellent for out-patients. As expected, the Latex assay had too low a sensitivity and negative predictive value to be recommended. In our hands, Nycocard D-Dimer also exhibited low sensitivity and negative predictive value, which were significantly improved when the plasma samples were tested by the manufacturer. Thus significant progress has been made, allowing clinical studies to be planned to compare the safety and cost-effectiveness of D-Dimer strategy to those of the conventional methods for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis.

Application of a Diagnostic Clinical Model for the Management of Hospitalized Patients with Suspected Deep-vein Thrombosis

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (04) ◽  
pp. 493-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip S. Wells ◽  
David R. Anderson ◽  
Janis Bormanis ◽  
Fred Guy ◽  
Michael Mitchell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Pretest Probability ◽  
Clinical Model ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer ◽  
High Pretest Probability

SummaryThe purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the determination of pretest probability using a simple clinical model and the SimpliRED D-dimer could be used to improve the management of hospitalized patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis. Consecutive hospitalized patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis, had their pretest probability determined using a clinical model and had a SimpliRED D-dimer assay. Patients at low pretest probability underwent a single ultrasound test. A negative ultrasound excluded the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis whereas a positive ultrasound was confirmed by venography. Patients at moderate pretest probability with a positive ultrasound were treated for deep-vein thrombosis whereas patients with an initial negative ultrasound underwent a single follow-up ultrasound one week later. Patients at high pretest probability with a positive ultrasound were treated whereas those with negative ultrasound underwent venography. All patients were followed for three months for the development of venous thromboembolic complications. Overall, 28% (42/150), and 10% (5/50), 21% (14/71) and 76% (22/29) of the low, moderate and high pretest probability patients, respectively, had deep vein thrombosis. Two of 111 (1.8%; 95% CI = 0.02% to 6.4%) patients considered to have deep vein thrombosis excluded had events during three-month follow-up. Overall 13 of 150 (8.7%) required venography and serial testing was limited to 58 of 150 (38.7%) patients. The negative predictive value of the SimpliRED D-dimer in patients with low pretest probability was 96.2%, which is not statistically different from the negative predictive value of a negative ultrasound result in low pretest probability patients (97.8%). Management of hospitalized patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis based on clinical probability and ultrasound of the proximal deep veins is safe and feasible.Dr. Philip Wells and Dr. David Anderson are the recipients of Research Scholarships from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

scholarly journals Safety of a strategy combining D-dimer testing and whole-leg ultrasonography to rule out deep vein thrombosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (20) ◽  
pp. 5002-5010
Author(s):  
Synne G. Fronas ◽  
Camilla T. Jørgensen ◽  
Anders E. A. Dahm ◽  
Hilde S. Wik ◽  
Jostein Gleditsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Pretest Probability ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer ◽  
Rule Out ◽  
Compression Ultrasonography ◽  
High Pretest Probability

Abstract Guidelines for the diagnostic workup of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) recommend assessing the clinical pretest probability before proceeding to D-dimer testing and/or compression ultrasonography (CUS) if the patient has high pretest probability or positive D-dimer. Referring only patients with positive D-dimer for whole-leg CUS irrespective of pretest probability may simplify the workup of DVT. In this prospective management outcome study, we assessed the safety of such a strategy. We included consecutive outpatients referred to the Emergency Department at Østfold Hospital, Norway, with suspected DVT between February 2015 and November 2018. STA-Liatest D-Di Plus D-dimer was analyzed for all patients, and only patients with levels ≥0.5 µg/mL were referred for CUS. All patients with negative D-dimer or negative CUS were followed for 3 months to assess the venous thromboembolic rate. One thousand three hundred ninety-seven patients were included. Median age was 64 years (interquartile range, 52-73 years), and 770 patients (55%) were female. D-dimer was negative in 415 patients (29.7%) and positive in 982 patients (70.3%). DVT was diagnosed in 277 patients (19.8%). Six patients in whom DVT was ruled out at baseline were diagnosed with DVT within 3 months of follow-up for a thromboembolic rate of 0.5% (95% confidence interval, 0.2-1.2). A simple diagnostic approach with initial stand-alone D-dimer followed by a single whole-leg CUS in patients with positive D-dimer safely ruled out DVT. We consider this strategy to be a valuable alternative to the conventional workup of DVT in outpatients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02486445.

Evidence for Safe Exclusion of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) by a Rapid ELISA D-Dimeer Test at Cut-Off Levels of 500 and 1000 Ng/Ml in 1046 Consecutive Outpatients with Suspected DVT.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1059-1059
Author(s):  
Jan Jacques Michels ◽  
Jan Hermssen ◽  
Paul H. Trienekens
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Score ◽  
Large Prospective Study ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Persistent Symptoms ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer ◽  
Compression Ultrasonography

Abstract Introduction.A normal compression ultrasonography (CUS) safely excludes proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with a negative predictive value of 97% indicating the need to repeat CUS testing within one week. In 3 studies, the rapid ELISA D-dimer assay at a cut-off of 500 ng/ml did have a sensitivity of 100% for the exclusion of venographically documented distal and proximal DVT irrespective of clinical score. To test this hypothesis we performed a large prospective study in outpatients with suspected DVT. Methods. CUS and a rapid ELISA D-Dimer test (VIDAS, BioMérieux L’Etoile, France) were performed in patients with suspected DVT. A negative CUS with a D-Dimer result of <500 ng/ml exclude DVT, and with a D-Dimer result of >500 ng/ml was followed by a second CUS within one week. Results. The prevalence of DVT 1046 consecutive out patients with suspected DVT was 23,4%. The first CUS was positive in 228 with a rapid ELISA D-Dimer of >500 ng/ml in 227 and of <500 ng/ml in one case, indicating a sensitivity of 99,6% irrespective of clinical score. The first CUS was negative in 818. The rapid ELISA D-dimer test Was <500 ng/ml in 297 of which 296 had a negative first CUS indicating a negative predictive value of 99.7% at a specificity of 37% irrespective of the clinicl score. The negative predictive value of a negative CUS plus a rapid ELISA D-Dimer result of less than 1000 ng/ml is 99.5% at a specificity of 67,9% irrespective of clinical score. The prevalence of DVT in patients with negative first CUS and a ELISA D-Dimer of >1000 ng/ml was 5.6% as documented by CUS repeat within on week. Conclusion.A normal rapid ELISA D-dimer test, <500 ng/ml, in outpatients with suspected DVT safely excludes DVT irrespective of clinical score. After a negative rapid ELISA result (<500 ng/ml), CUS is still indicated for safety reasons in patients with suspected DVT and persistent symptoms in search for an alternative diagnosis, or for a rare case of DVT. A negative CUS plus and ELISA D-Dimer result of <1000 ng/ml safely exclude DVT without the need to repeat CUS in 2/3 of patients with a negative first CUS.

scholarly journals Residual Vein Thrombosis Echogenicity Is Associated to the Risk of DVT Recurrence: A Cohort Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 477-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna M. Mazetto ◽  
Fernanda L. A. Orsi ◽  
Sandra A. F. Silveira ◽  
Luis F. Bittar ◽  
Mariane M. C. Flores-Nascimento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Late Complication ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Predictive Markers ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

Although deep vein thrombosis (DVT) recurrence is a common late complication of the disease, there are few predictive markers to risk-stratify patients long-term after the thrombotic event. The accuracy of residual vein thrombosis (RVT) in this context is controversial, possibly due to a lack of a standardized methodology. The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of RVT echogenicity as a predictive marker of late DVT recurrence. To evaluate the accuracy of RVT echogenicity as a predictive marker of late DVT recurrence. This prospective study included patients with history of DVT in the past 33 months. Ultrasound examination was performed to detect the presence of RVT, and its echogenicity was determined by calculating the grayscale median (GSM) of the images. Blood samplings were taken for plasma D-dimer levels. Patients were followed-up for 28 months and the primary end point was DVT recurrence. Deep vein thrombosis recurrence was confirmed or excluded by ultrasound during the follow-up. Fifty-six patients were included, of which 10 presented DVT recurrence during the follow-up. D-dimer levels above 630 ng/mL conferred higher risk for recurrence with a negative predictive value of 94%. The absence of RVT was a protective marker for recurrence with a negative predictive value of 100%. Also, the presence of hypoechoic RVT, determined by GSM values below 24, positively predicted 75% of DVT recurrences. Our results suggest that the persistence of RVT and, particularly, the presence of hypoechoic thrombi (GSM < 24) are predictive markers of the risk of DVT recurrence. Residual vein thrombosis echogenicity, by GSM analysis, could represent a new strategy for the evaluation of recurrence risk in patients with DVT.

scholarly journals Incidence and predictors of occult preoperative deep vein thrombosis at radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanner S. Miest ◽  
Vidit Sharma ◽  
R. Jeffrey Karnes ◽  
Stephen A. Boorjian ◽  
R. Houston Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

Introduction: Patients undergoing radical cystectomy are at high perioperative risk for deep vein thrombosis due to age, malignancy, recent transurethral resection, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We, therefore, evaluated the incidence and predictors of occult preoperative deep vein thrombosis prior to radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma. Methods: We prospectively screened 52 asymptomatic patients with urothelial carcinoma undergoing radical cystectomy at our institution with lower extremity ultrasound and D-dimer assay within two weeks prior to surgery. Patients with a prior history of deep vein thrombosis and those on systemic anticoagulation were excluded. Results: We identified 4/52 patients (7.7%) with preoperative asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis prior to radical cystectomy. Median D-dimer for patients with and without preoperative deep vein thrombosis was 787 ng/ml(interquartile range [IQR] 365–1257) and 260 ng/ml(IQR 158–498), respectively. A D-dimer threshold of >250 ng/ml had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 50%, resulting in a negative predictive value of 100% and positive predictive value of 14.8% for preoperative deep vein thrombosis. Increasing the D-dimer threshold to >1000 ng/ml created a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 85%, resulting in a negative predictive value of 92% and positive predictive value of 33%. D-dimer values did not significantly vary with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or days since transurethral resection. Conclusions: Approximately 8% of patients had an occult deep vein thrombosis prior to radical cystectomy. D-dimer can provide sensitive diagnostic utility for deep vein thrombosis in the pre-radical cystectomy setting and could help guide use of preoperative lower extremity ultrasound in this high-risk patient population.

Diagnostic Value of Compression Ultrasonography and Fibrinogen-related Parameters for the Detection of Postoperative Deep Vein Thrombosis following Elective Hip Replacement: a Pilot Study

1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (05) ◽  
pp. 1235-1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Crippa ◽  
Flavio Ravasi ◽  
Silvana Vigano D’Angelo ◽  
Roberto Varagona ◽  
Emanuela Milani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Postoperative Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryTo determine their ability to diagnose postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) D-dimer – by three methods – fibrinogen degradation products (FgDP) and fibrinogen levels were measured in 68 consecutive patients before elective surgery for hip replacement and on postoperative day 1, 3, 6, and 10. All patients received prophylaxis and underwent compression real-time B-mode ultrasonography (C-US) on postoperative day 5 and 9, and bilateral ascending venography on day 10. Twenty-two out of 68 patients developed asymptomatic postoperative DVT, which was limited to the calf veins in 14 and involved the proximal veins in 8 patients. C-US was negative in all patients on day 5. On day 9, C-US sensitivity and specificity for proximal DVT were 63% (95% confidence interval: 26%-90%) and 98% (89%-100%) respectively. Postoperative changes in the laboratory parameters evaluated were not different in patients with or without DVT until day 10. On day 10, mean D-dimer, FgDP and fibrinogen levels were significantly higher in patients with DVT than in those without DVT (p values between 0.006 and 0.032), but only D-dimer was higher with DVT involving two or more venous segments than with thrombosis involving one venous segment only (p <0.05). Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified D-dimer and fibrinogen on day 10 as predictors of postoperative DVT. In a receiver operator curve and after weighing for the coefficients generated by logistic regression analysis, the combination of a latex photometric immunoassay and of PT-derived fibrinogen yielded - at a cut-off value of 7.0 - a sensitivity of 100% (73%-100%) and a specificity of 58% (39%-75%) for DVT, with a negative predictive value of 100% (78%-100%), a positive predictive value of 52% (32%-71%) and an overall accuracy of 71% (55%-83%). These results suggest that two simple, fast and reproducible tests may permit the identification of patients at low risk of having postoperative DVT and that a combination of sensitive laboratory assays and of the highly specific C-US may select patients requiring anticoagulant treatment. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this approach should be evaluated in large clinical management studies.

scholarly journals Performance of a New Fibrin Monomer Assay to Exclude Deep Vein Thrombosis in Symptomatic Outpatients

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (01) ◽  
pp. 50-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Caliezi ◽  
Nadja Fünfsinn ◽  
Thomas Mauron ◽  
Iris Baumgartner ◽  
Irmela Sulzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Fibrin Monomer ◽  
Objective Tests ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Accuracy Indices ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryIn this study we prospectively assessed the reliability of a new fibrin monomer assay in 106 outpatients with clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis of the lower limb. According to the results of the objective tests and using different cut-off points we calculated the sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of the fibrin monomer assay. The prevalence of deep vein thrombosis was 44.3% (31.1% proximal, 13.2% distal). Using a cut-off level of plasma fibrin monomer of 3.5 μg/ml, a sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 94-100%), 35.6% (95% CI: 23-48%) and 100% (95% CI: 86-100%), respectively, were obtained. The exclusion rate was 19.8% (95% CI: 12-27%) of all referred patients. These accuracy indices compared favourably with the respective results of a routine D-dimer ELISA used for comparison. Conclusion: This new fibrin monomer assay appears to be a reliable method for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients.

The diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism

Hematology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (1) ◽  
pp. 457-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Wells ◽  
David Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Pretest Probability ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Major Hemorrhage ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common condition that can lead to complications such as postphlebitic syndrome, chronic pulmonary artery hypertension, and death. The approach to the diagnosis of has evolved over the years and an algorithm strategy combining pretest probability, D-dimer testing, and diagnostic imaging now allows for safe, convenient, and cost-effective investigation of patients. Patients with low pretest probability and a negative D-dimer can have VTE excluded without the need for imaging. The mainstay of treatment of VTE is anticoagulation, whereas interventions such as thrombolysis and inferior vena cava filters are reserved for special situations. Low-molecular-weight heparin has allowed for outpatient management of most patients with deep vein thrombosis at a considerable cost savings to the health care system. Patients with malignancy-associated VTE benefit from decreased recurrent rates if treated with long-term low-molecular-weight heparin. The development of new oral anticoagulants further simplifies treatment. The duration of anticoagulation is primarily influenced by underlying cause of the VTE (whether provoked or not) and consideration of the risk for major hemorrhage. Testing for genetic and acquired thrombophilia may provide insight as to the cause of a first idiopathic deep vein thrombosis, but the evidence linking most thrombophilias to an increased risk of recurrent thrombosis is limited.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document