Is Clinical Probability Assessment of Deep Vein Thrombosis by a Score Really Standardized?

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (05) ◽  
pp. 788-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Bigaroni ◽  
Arnaud Perrier ◽  
Henri Bounameaux
VASA ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian M. Schellong ◽  
T. Schwarz ◽  
T. Pudollek ◽  
B. Schmidt ◽  
H. E. Schroeder

Background: Compression ultrasound is considered the preferred test for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis of the leg (DVT). Since sensitivity for distal thrombosis is low additional tests are required. We developed a protocol of complete compression ultrasound of all venous segments of the leg (CCUS). A retrospective outcome study was performed to get an estimate of the rate of indeterminate results necessitating repeated testing as well as for the clinical safety of CCUS in a cohort of consecutive, unselected patients. Patients and methods: Case records of all patients referred for clinical suspicion of deep vein thrombosis within a three months period were reviewed. Patients with negative CCUS were followed directly or via the general practitioner in order to know whether an episode of venous thromboembolism had been documented since the initial CCUS. Results: 132 inpatients and 154 outpatients were identified. Clinical probability was high in 50 patients, medium in 142, and low in 94. The first CCUS was negative in 209 cases. Five patients (1,8%) had repeated CCUS within the next 7 days because of incomplete visualisation of the distal veins and turned out to be negative as well. Of all 214 patients with negative CCUS a clinical follow-up information was obtained after 168 ± 25 days. Five patients had died, none due to pulmonary embolism. In two patients deep vein thrombosis had been documented (0,9% [95% CI: 0,1–3,3%]) 148 and 172 days after CCUS, respectively. Conclusion: CCUS for diagnosis of DVT needs to be repeated in very few cases only. Clinical safety seems to fall into the same range as with combined algorithms and should be tested in a prospective design. Patients with medium and high probability showed a very low incidence of DVT within three months following CCUS; therefore, they may be included in a prospective outcome study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (10) ◽  
pp. 1937-1943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Julian ◽  
Lori-Ann Linkins ◽  
Shannon Bates ◽  
Clive Kearon ◽  
Sarah Takach Lapner

SummaryTwo new strategies for interpreting D-dimer results have been proposed: i) using a progressively higher D-dimer threshold with increasing age (age-adjusted strategy) and ii) using a D-dimer threshold in patients with low clinical probability that is twice the threshold used in patients with moderate clinical probability (clinical probability-adjusted strategy). Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of age-adjusted and clinical probability-adjusted D-dimer interpretation in patients with a low or moderate clinical probability of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data and blood samples from two prospective studies. We compared the negative predictive value (NPV) for VTE, and the proportion of patients with a negative D-dimer result, using two D-dimer interpretation strategies: the age-adjusted strategy, which uses a progressively higher D-dimer threshold with increasing age over 50 years (age in years × 10 µg/L FEU); and the clinical probability-adjusted strategy which uses a D-dimer threshold of 1000 µg/L FEU in patients with low clinical probability and 500 µg/L FEU in patients with moderate clinical probability. A total of 1649 outpatients with low or moderate clinical probability for a first suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were included. The NPV of both the clinical probability-adjusted strategy (99.7%) and the age-adjusted strategy (99.6%) were similar. However, the proportion of patients with a negative result was greater with the clinical probability-adjusted strategy (56.1% vs, 50.9%; difference 5.2%; 95% CI 3.5% to 6.8%). These findings suggest that clinical probability-adjusted D-dimer interpretation is a better way of interpreting D-dimer results compared to age-adjusted interpretation.


Blood ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 99 (9) ◽  
pp. 3102-3110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Hirsh ◽  
Agnes Y. Y. Lee

Abstract Making a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) requires both clinical assessment and objective testing because the clinical features are nonspecific and investigations can be either falsely positive or negative. The initial step in the diagnostic process is to stratify patients into high-, intermediate-, or low-risk categories using a validated clinical model. When the clinical probability is intermediate or high and the venous ultrasound result is positive, acute symptomatic DVT is confirmed. Similarly, when the probability is low and the ultrasound result is normal, DVT is ruled out. A low clinical probability combined with a negative D-dimer result can also be used to rule out DVT, thereby obviating the need for ultrasonography. In contrast, when the clinical assessment is discordant with the results of objective testing, serial venous ultrasonography or venography is required to confirm or refute a diagnosis of DVT. Once a patient is diagnosed with an acute DVT, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the agent of choice for initial therapy and oral anticoagulant therapy is the standard for long-term secondary prophylaxis. Therapy should continue for at least 3 months; the decision to continue treatment beyond 3 months is made by weighing the risks of recurrent thrombosis and anticoagulant-related bleeding, and is influenced by patient preference. Screening for associated thrombophilia is not indicated routinely, but should be performed in selected patients whose clinical features suggest an underlying hypercoagulable state. Several new anticoagulants with theoretical advantages over existing agents are undergoing evaluation in phase 3 studies in patients with venous thromboembolism.


2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 1099-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Yamaki ◽  
Motohiro Nozaki ◽  
Hiroyuki Sakurai ◽  
Yuji Kikuchi ◽  
Kazutaka Soejima ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 458-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efrem Gómez-Jabalera ◽  
Sergio Bellmunt Montoya ◽  
Eva Fuentes-Camps ◽  
José Román Escudero Rodríguez

Objective In the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, new D-dimer cut-off values were defined by multiplying 10 µg/L × age. The objective of the present study is to define a more specific age-adjusted value, including the pre-test Wells score, without worsening sensitivity. Methods We designed a case–control study in patients attended in the emergency department with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. Demographics, Wells score, D-dimer and ultrasound data were collected. In low and intermediate clinical probability cases for deep vein thrombosis, we determined the specificity and sensitivity (false-negative rates) for the following cut-off values of D-dimer: age × 10 µg/L, age × 15 µg/L, age × 20 µg/L, age × 25 µg/L and age × 30 µg/L. The cut-off value with maximum specificity without any false-negative result (sensitivity 100%) was identified. Results We included 138 consecutive patients, 39.9% were men and the mean age was 71.6 years. Deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed in 16.7% of patients and the Wells score was low in 69.6%, intermediate in 21% and high in 9.4% of patients. Applying the conventional cut-off value of 500 µg/L, the specificity was 21.1% with a sensitivity of 100%. Maintaining 100% sensitivity, the highest specificity was reached with a cut-off value for D-dimer equivalent to the age × 25 µg/L in low-risk patients (67.1% specificity) and the age × 10 µg/L (50% specificity) in intermediate-risk patients. Conclusions In patients with low Wells score, the cut-off value can be raised to age × 25 µg/L in order to rule out deep vein thrombosis without jeopardizing safety. In intermediate-risk patients, the D-dimer cut-off value could be raised to age × 10 µg/L as previously suggested.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document