Venous thrombosis and multiple prothrombotic gene defects

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (03) ◽  
pp. 117-120
Author(s):  
C. Mengis ◽  
F. Demarmels Biasiutti

SummaryWe describe the case of a 30-year-old woman with homozygous prothrombin G20210A transition and heterozygous FV Leiden mutation and a history of postpartum venous thrombosis. Despite the high thrombotic risk to be assumed in the presence of this combined thrombophilia our patient suffered her first venous thrombotic event only at the age of 29 years during the puerperium of her first pregnancy. This fact supports the concept of venous thrombosis as a multicausal disease, with interaction of genetic and acquired risk factors. The case presented also stresses the importance of performing complete thrombophilia investigation.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 5136-5136
Author(s):  
Ondrej Zapletal ◽  
Jan Blatny ◽  
Eva Janousova

Abstract Abstract 5136 Introduction: Pro-thrombotic risk factors are associated with increased risk of thrombosis. Some of them are inherited, but clinical manifestation of thrombosis in childhood is rare. It is most likely to appear in the adulthood. When leading to thrombosis during childhood, risk factors must be either very strong (e. g. homozygous deficiency of natural coagulation inhibitors), or must act together with other, usually acquired factors. Aims: - To analyse data of children referred for thrombophilia screening to Thrombosis Haemostasis centre, Dpt. of Paediatric Haematology University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic in years 2005–09. - To specify the characteristics of that cohort and identify the reasons for referral. -To determine prevalence of respective risk factors (RF) in children within study cohort. -To analyse possible correlation between related RF findings (ProC Global and FV Leiden, Protein C, Protein S; homocystein and MTHFR C677T polymorphism). Methods: We have collected data of all consecutive children aged from 0 to 18 years referred to our out-patient clinic for assessment of inherited thrombophilia in years 2005–2009 for any reason. Data recorded for each patient were as follows: age, gender, reason for assessment, thrombotic event and its type (if applicable) and vascular anomalies. Laboratory examinations done: FV Leiden mutation, Prothrombin gene mutation G20210A, MTHFR C677T polymorphism, protein C, protein S and Antithrombin levels, coagulation activity of F VIII, ProC Global test, homocystein and lipoprotein (a) level. Data were statistically analyzed to reach the aims of the study. Results: Data of 849 Caucasian children aged 0–18 years were available for analysis, 475 girls (55. 9 %) and 374 boys (44. 1 %). Median age was 11 years at the time of referral, boys 10 years, girls 13 years. Reasons for thrombophilia screening were as follows: family history of thrombosis/thrombophilia (70. 6 %), vascular anomaly (10. 8 %), thrombotic event (8 %) and others (10. 6 %). Thrombophilia screening was in more than 70 % of children performed before 15 years of age. Thrombotic event has been recorded in 79 patients (9. 3 %), both arterial (37. 6 %) and venous (63. 3 %). Adolescent patients had significantly more thrombotic events than younger children. Most of them were venous thromboses. Ischemic strokes and other arterial events were relatively more frequent in younger children. Frequency of “positive” laboratory findings in the studied cohort were as follows: MTHFR 60. 3 %, positive ProC Global test findings 58. 1 %, FV Leiden (heterozygous)37 %, hyperlipoproteinemia (a) 28. 5 %, protein S deficiency 11. 3 %, high FVIII activity 9. 4 %, Prothrombin gene mutation (heterozygous) 7. 7 %, Antithrombin deficiency 2. 7 %, elevation of homocystein 1. 6 % and protein C deficiency 1 %. Findings have confirmed high sensitivity of ProC Global test to the pathology in protein C pathway, particularly to FV Leiden mutation (sensitivity 98. 4 %). There was no statistically significant relation between homocystein level and MTHFR polymorphism status. Prevalence of RF in study cohort was found to be similar to the literature data. Deficiencies of natural coagulation inhibitors (AT, PC and PS) were rare, pro-thrombotic mutations were more frequent. Data suggest, that role of inherited pro-thrombotic risk factors in the development of thrombotic event in children is not the major one. It is very likely, that more potent risk factors, often acquired ones, are often important for development of thrombotic event during childhood. Conclusions: In our centre, we assessed proximately 170 children referred for thrombophilia screening per year. The incidence is thus 8 children per 10000. During 2005–09the main reason for referral was positive family history, but children were often referred in younger age, than recommended. The evidence available to date suggests that it is neither necessary nor useful to examine asymptomatic children before they reach puberty. Finding of inherited thrombophilia, and thus possibility to use measures preventing eventual thrombotic event, are more important in adolescence and adulthood rather than in younger age. In children with thrombotic event, however, it is recommended to screen for inherited risks. Diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic event in children requires a specialised care and relevant expertise of the Paediatric Thrombosis Haemostasis centre. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (26) ◽  
pp. 4264-4269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel E. J. Roach ◽  
Willem M. Lijfering ◽  
Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg ◽  
Frans M. Helmerhorst ◽  
Frits R. Rosendaal ◽  
...  

Key Points Superficial vein thrombosis combined with an acquired thrombotic risk factor increases the risk of venous thrombosis 10- to 100-fold. If confirmed, these findings have important implications for the future prevention of venous thrombosis.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4054-4054
Author(s):  
Bo Xu ◽  
Steven Thompson ◽  
Carol Koenigberger ◽  
James Pettay ◽  
Arkadiy Silbergleit ◽  
...  

Abstract Venous thrombosis (VT) is a multi-factorial disorder with both congenital and acquired risk factors. Mutations in several genes, such as factor V, prothrombin and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), are considered risk factors for thrombophilia. Since multiple mutations compound the risk for (VT), simultaneous discovery of mutations could directly alter patient management. In this study, we employed the GeneOhm ePlex™ platform to simultaneously detect genetic polymorphisms for six markers: factor V Leiden (FVL) and HR2A45374G, prothrombin G20210A, MTHFR C677T and A1298C, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (4G/5G). Fifty-one patient samples were selected. Each sample was genotyped for all six markers on the GeneOhm ePlex™ electrochemical array and data from functional studies were analyzed and compared to the genotyping results. Among the 51 patients, 16 were tested for activated protein C resistance and the average values were 1.22, 1.76 and 2.64 for FVL homozygous, heterozygous and wild type normal patients, respectively. In addition, the average plasma homocysteine levels measured in 17 patients were 15.40, 6.42 and 11.93, 12.63 mmol/L for MTHFR C677T homozygous, heterozygous and MTHFR A1298C heterozygous and C677T/A1298C double heterozygous, respectively. Furthermore, 10 out of 11 patients with history of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) displayed genetic abnormalities in FVL or prothrombin G20210A. The other patient with history of both DVT and PE showed homozygous in MTHFR C677T with high plasma homocysteine level (22.3 mmol/L) and heterozygous mutation in PAI-1. This study demonstrates the principle of multiplexed molecular diagnostics for the polymorphisms associated with thrombophilia and the utility of the GeneOhm ePlex platform. The study is being expanded to test a larger set of samples to establish the relationship between genetic polymorphism and corresponding clinical outcome for all six markers.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1776-1776
Author(s):  
Paola Guglielmelli ◽  
Giacomo Coltro ◽  
Giuseppe Gaetano Loscocco ◽  
Benedetta Sordi ◽  
Francesco Mannelli ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. Cardiovascular (CV) events are leading cause of morbidity and mortality in PV. Current risk stratification is based on variables predicting thrombotic risk, ie age >60y and history of thrombosis. Recent studies focused on additional thrombotic risk factors in PV, including generic CV factors and leukocytosis. PV patients (pts) are JAK2V617F mutated, and present wide heterogeneity in variant allele frequency (VAF); it was shown that a VAF >75% was associated with higher number of thrombotic events after diagnosis (Vannucchi AM, Leukemia 2007), but the prognostic role of JAK2 VAF is still debated. Aim. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of JAK2V617F VAF on rate of thrombosis in WHO-2016 defined PV pts. Patients and Method. In the CRIMM (Florence) database, a total of 577 pts with a JAK2VF VAF determined within 3 years from diagnosis, who met the 2016 WHO criteria for PV, were identified. All pts had information regarding thromboembolic events, including history of thrombosis, occurrence, type and date of thrombosis in the follow-up (FU) and presence of CV risk factors (smoking, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus). Thrombosis‐free survival (TFS) was determined from the time of diagnosis to the time the first thrombotic event occurred. Pts in whom thrombosis did not occur were censored at the time of last FU. Pre-receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots were used to determine cutoff levels for continuous variables of interest. Differences in the distribution of continuous variables between categories were analyzed by Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test. Pts' groups with nominal variables were compared by χ2 test. TFS was estimated by Kaplan Meier analysis; log rank test was used to compare TFS difference between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression was used for multivariable analysis. A two tailed P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. The median age of pts at diagnosis was 61y, 308 (53.4%) were above 60y; 57.2% were males. All pts were mutated for JAK2V617F with a median VAF 43% (range 1-100%), 62% had at least one CV risk factor; 83 (14.4%) pts suffered from an episode of thrombosis within 3 yr from, or coincident with, diagnosis. The median FU was 7.3y (0.6-35.9y) during which 87 pts (15.1%) developed thrombosis. (50 arterial and 45 venous thrombosis). During the FU, 110 pts (19.1%) died. A JAK2VAF of ≥60% cutoff level, as determined by ROC analysis, correlated with measurements of stimulated erythropoiesis (higher hematocrit, lower mean cell volume and serum ferritin; all P<.01), leukocytosis (P<.0001), lower platelets count (P=.02) and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P<.03). Pts with ≥60% JAK2V617F VAF were at higher relative risk (RR) of having splenomegaly (RR 3.1; P<0.001), suffering from pruritus (RR 2.5; P<0.001) or constitutional symptoms (RR 1.9; P=0.01), harboring a BM fibrosis grade-1 (RR 3.1; P<0.001). Additionally, pts with a VAF>60% had greater risk to progress to PPV-MF (RR 8.5, P<.0001) and acute leukemia (RR 4.4, P=0.04) or to die (RR 3.8, P<0.0001). The JAK2VF VAF (continuous or ≥60%) did not correlate with occurrence of thrombosis at diagnosis, while the rate of thrombosis during FU was significantly increased in pts with VAF ≥60% (23.4% vs 11.0%, RR 2.4, 95%CI = 1.4-4.0; P<0.0001), more marked for venous (RR 3.7, 95%CI = 2.0-6.8; P<0.0001) than arterial (RR 1.8, 95%CI = 0.9-3.3; P=0.05) thrombosis. The impact of VAF on thrombosis during FU was then estimated according to the conventional risk category. In low risk pts (LR) (n=236), factors significantly associated with occurrence of FU thrombosis were CV risk factors (dyslipidemia (RR 3.3, P = 0.02) and hypertension (RR 1.8, P=0.048)), a G1 BM fibrosis (RR 5.3, P=0.006), presence of splenomegaly (RR, 3.2, P=0.001) or constitutional symptoms (RR 3.3, P=0.003) and a VAF ≥60% (RR 2.2, P = 0.024). In high risk pts (HR) (n=341), factors significant for FU thrombosis were splenomegaly (RR 2.0, P=0.03), elevated LDH (RR 4.0, P=0.009) and a VAF ≥60% (RR 2.3, P = 0.012). A VAF ≥60% was correlated with shortened venous TFS after diagnosis in HR (P = 0.01, HR = 3.2, 95%CI = 1.2−8.3; fig.) but not in LR pts (P = 0.20, HR = 1.1, 95%CI = 0.5−2.9). Conclusions. This study indicates that conventionally-defined high-risk PV pts with a JAK2V617F VAF ≥60% suffer from increased rate of venous events and might be worthwhile of more intensive antithrombotic prophylaxis. Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Hematology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 2002 (1) ◽  
pp. 353-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth A. Bauer ◽  
Frits R. Rosendaal ◽  
John A. Heit

Abstract It is now possible to identify hereditary and acquired risk factors in a substantial percentage of patients presenting with a venous thrombotic event. The clinician is faced with an ever-growing number of laboratory tests that can be ordered in such patients, and there is considerable uncertainty as to how this information should be utilized in patient management. Some have argued that widespread testing of thrombosis patients for prothrombotic abnormalities such as the factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations has been prematurely adopted into clinical practice as there are few data that their identification leads to improved clinical outcomes. Dr. Rosendaal provides an overview of the epidemiology of venous thrombosis with an emphasis on hereditary and acquired risk factors. The presentation will include information obtained from properly designed case-control studies as well as family studies. While some have suggested treatment strategies for managing patients with hereditary thrombophilia with prior thrombotic events or for managing patients undergoing procedures associated with increased thrombotic risk, clinical decision making is complicated by the need to assess the risk of recurrence and the likely benefit of prolonged anticoagulation versus the associated bleeding risk. Drs. Bauer, Heit, and Rosendaal discuss their approaches to patient management. Case presentations are used to illustrate the impact of laboratory test results on decisions.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (21) ◽  
pp. 5314-5322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem M. Lijfering ◽  
Jan-Leendert P. Brouwer ◽  
Nic J. G. M. Veeger ◽  
Ivan Bank ◽  
Michiel Coppens ◽  
...  

Abstract Thrombophilia screening is controversial. In a retrospective family cohort, where probands had thrombosis and a thrombophilic defect, 2479 relatives were tested for thrombophilia. In antithrombin-, protein C–, and protein S–deficient relatives, annual incidences of venous thrombosis were 1.77% (95% CI, 1.14-2.60), 1.52% (95% CI, 1.06-2.11), and 1.90% (95% CI, 1.32-2.64), respectively, at a median age of 29 years and a positive family history of more than 20% symptomatic relatives. In relatives with factor V (FV) Leiden, prothrombin 20210G>A, or high FVIII levels, these were 0.49% (95% CI, 0.39-0.60), 0.34% (95% CI, 0.22-0.49), and 0.49% (95% CI, 0.41-0.51), respectively. High FIX, FXI, and TAFI, and hyperhomocysteinemia were not independent risk factors. Annual incidence of major bleeding in antithrombin-, protein C–, or protein S–deficient relatives on anticoagulants was 0.29% (95% CI, 0.03-1.04). Cumulative recurrence rates in relatives with antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency were 19% at 2 years, 40% at 5 years, and 55% at 10 years. In relatives with FV Leiden, prothrombin 20210G>A, or high levels FVIII, these were 7%, 11%, and 25%, respectively. Considering its clinical implications, thrombophilia testing should address hereditary deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S in patients with first venous thrombosis at young age and/or a strong family history of venous thrombosis.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 5057-5057
Author(s):  
Bruno Martino ◽  
Caterina Alati ◽  
Patrizia Cufari ◽  
Iolanda Vincelli ◽  
Francesca Ronco ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5057 There is evidence in literature of the clinical and pathogenetic role of JAK2 V617F mutation in MPN, while its contribute as an additional thrombotic risk factor in MPN patients is still under discussion. The jak2 mutation has been identified as occult marker in several patients with splanchnic venous thrombosis (SVT); morover, 45% of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) and 34% of patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) have associated MPN. On the other hand, the majority of BCS patients without MPN present additional congenital or acquired thrombosis risk factors. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the incidence of SVT in MPN patients. We also evaluated the presence of other prothrombotic risk factors in MPN patients, in addition to the JAK-2 mutation. Out of the 460 Ph1 negative MPN patients observed in our center from January 2000 to January 2010 and retrospectively evaluated, 9 patients (7 females and 2 males; 2%) presented SVT. Six cases had Essential Thrombocythemia (ET), 2 Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), and 1 Polycitemia Vera (PV). Five of the 6 cases with ET were females. Among the entire population of ET, SVT incidence was 3%. All the 9 patients diagnosed of SVT were JAK2 V617F positive and they were treated with antiaggregant and anticoagulation therapy; 6 received hydrossiurea. Seven patients had SVT before MPN diagnosis, 2 of them had splenectomy at diagnosis for surgical decision. In these patients developing SVT before MPN diagnosis no other major thrombotic event occurred during follow-up. The remaining 2 MPNs patients presented asymptomatic SVT diagnosed by imaging techniques routinely performed during MPN follow up. Interestingly, 75% of MPNs patients with SVT demonstrated at least one prothromobtic risk factor, such as factor V Leiden, Protein C deficiency, hyperhomocystinemia and 50% had 2 or more associated defects. MPNs patients without SVT (396) had a lower prevalence of prothrombotic risk factors and developed venous thrombosis in different anatomical sites: in these cases white blood cell count, platelets values and the presence of JAK2 V617F mutation correlate with the development of the thrombotic event. Conclusion. Even though SVT has a low incidence in MPNs patients, according to the results of the present retrospective study we suggest the potential benefit of searching for additional prothrombotic risk factors in the whole MPN population in order to prevent and/or properly treat this complication. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1083-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia Ruffatti ◽  
Teresa Del Ross ◽  
Manuela Ciprian ◽  
Maria T Bertero ◽  
Sciascia Salvatore ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo assess risk factors for a first thrombotic event in confirmed antiphospholipid (aPL) antibody carriers and to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic treatments.MethodsInclusion criteria were age 18–65 years, no history of thrombosis and two consecutive positive aPL results. Demographic, laboratory and clinical parameters were collected at enrolment, once a year during the follow-up and at the time of the thrombotic event, whenever that occurred.Results258 subjects were prospectively observed between October 2004 and October 2008. The mean±SD follow-up was 35.0±11.9 months (range 1–48). A first thrombotic event (9 venous, 4 arterial and 1 transient ischaemic attack) occurred in 14 subjects (5.4%, annual incidence rate 1.86%). Hypertension and lupus anticoagulant (LA) were significantly predictive of thrombosis (both at p<0.05) and thromboprophylaxis was significantly protective during high-risk periods (p<0.05) according to univariate analysis. Hypertension and LA were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis as independent risk factors for thrombosis (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 11.1, p<0.05, and HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 14, p<0.05, respectively).ConclusionsHypertension and LA are independent risk factors for thrombosis in aPL carriers. Thromboprophylaxis in these subjects should probably be limited to high-risk situations.


1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (01) ◽  
pp. 46-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catello Tommasino ◽  
Giovanna D’Andrea ◽  
Luigi Iannaccone ◽  
Vincenzo Brancaccio ◽  
Maurizio Margaglione ◽  
...  

SummaryTo evaluate the significance of common thrombophilic genotypes in subjects with idiopathic antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) we determined the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677→ (MTHFR) and factor V A506→ G (FV Leiden) polymorphisms in 49 subjects with idiopathic aPL (57% of whom suffered spontaneous vein thrombosis), in 70 subjects with a history of spontaneous vein thrombosis and in 193 healthy subjects. The prevalence of MTHFR C677→+/+ (homozygotes) was 25%, 18% and 17% respectively amongst aPL thrombotics, non aPL thrombotics and controls and that of MTHFR C677→+/– (heterozygotes) was 53%, 59% and 53% respectively in the same groups. The prevalence of FV Leiden was higher in aPL thrombotics (14%) and in non aPL thrombotics (18%) than in controls (4%) (p ≤ = 0.05). APL thrombotics with MTHFR C677→+/+ had a lower mean age at first thrombotic event (22 ± 6 years) than aPL thrombotics with MTHFR C677→+/– and non mutated considered together (38 ± 14 years, p = 0.0004) and than non aPL thrombotics with MTHFR C677→+/+ (38 ± 14 years, p = 0.003). FV Leiden may con tribute to the hypercoagulability of a small, albeit significant proportion of thrombotic aPL subjects, whereas the association between MTHFR C677→+/+ and aPL may have an impact on age at first occlusive event and suggests a possible pathogenetic interaction.


2001 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gurgey ◽  
I.C. Haznedaroglu ◽  
T. Egesel ◽  
Y. Buyukas?k ◽  
O.I. Ozcebe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document