Successful eradication of a FVIII inhibitor in a 60-year-old patient with mild haemophilia A using single-agent prednisolone

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S48-S51 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Marx ◽  
B. Lentz ◽  
C. Bokemeyer ◽  
F. Langer ◽  
K. Holstein

Summary Background Development of FVIII inhibitors represents a major challenge in patients with mild haemophilia A (HA), because they tend to occur at an older age and classical immune tolerance induction appears to be less effective. Case report A man (age: 60 years) with mild HA due to the missense mutation, Leu1929Arg, received a single dose of rFVIII at 35 IU/kg prior to routine colonoscopy, totalling 25 lifetime exposure days. Two months later, rFVIII was infused for a traumatic hip haematoma. However, FVIII recovery was inappropriate, and a FVIII inhibitor of 19 BU with type-2 kinetics was detected, resulting in FVIII:C of < 1%. Two weeks later, the patient experienced spontaneous iliopsoas bleeding. Parallel to bypassing therapy, we started single-agent immunosuppression with prednisolone at 1.5 mg/kg. FVIII : C “normalized” at 10.2% after four weeks. After five months, the inhibitor titre fell to < 0.4 BU with sustained remission after one year of follow-up. Conclusion In mild HA, FVIII inhibitors may share characteristic features with FVIII autoantibodies commonly observed in acquired HA. Therefore, immunosuppressive therapy alone could be successful at least in a subset of patients.

1976 ◽  
Vol 35 (03) ◽  
pp. 510-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inga Marie Nilsson

SummaryThe incidence of living haemophiliacs in Sweden (total population 8.1 millions) is about 1:15,000 males and about 1:30,000 of the entire population. The number of haemophiliacs born in Sweden in 5-year periods between 1931-1975 (June) has remained almost unchanged. The total number of haemophilia families in Sweden is 284 (77% haemophilia A, 23% haemophilia B) with altogether 557 (436 with A and 121 with B) living haemophiliacs. Of the haemophilia A patients 40 % have severe, 18 % moderate, and 42 % mild, haemophilia. The distribution of the haemophilia B patients is about the same. Inhibitors have been demonstrated in 8% of the patients with severe haemophilia A and in 10% of those with severe haemophilia B.There are 2 main Haemophilia Centres (Stockholm, Malmo) to which haemophiliacs from the whole of Sweden are admitted for diagnosis, follow-up and treatment for severe bleedings, joint defects and surgery. Minor bleedings are treated at local hospitals in cooperation with the Haemophilia Centres. The concentrates available for treatment in haemophilia A are human fraction 1-0 (AHF-Kabi), cryoprecipitate, Antihaemophilic Factor (Hyland 4) and Kryobulin (Immuno, Wien). AHF-Kabi is the most commonly used preparation. The concentrates available for treatment in haemophilia B are Preconativ (Kabi) and Prothromplex (Immuno). Sufficient amounts of concentrates are available. In Sweden 3.2 million units of factor VIII and 1.0 million units of factor IX are given per year. Treatment is free of charge.Only 5 patients receive domiciliary treatment, but since 1958 we in Sweden have practised prophylactic treatment of boys (4–18 years old) with severe haemophilia A. At about 5-10 days interval they receive AHF in amounts sufficient to raise the AHF level to 40–50%. This regimen has reduced severe haemophilia to moderate. The joint score is identical with that found in moderate haemophilia in the same age groups. For treatment of patients with haemophilia A and haemophilia B complicated by inhibitors we have used a large dose of antigen (factor VIII or factor IX) combined with cyclophosphamide. In most cases this treatment produced satisfactory haemostasis for 5 to 30 days and prevented the secondary antibody rise.


2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (01) ◽  
pp. 59-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Caram ◽  
Roberta Grazielle de Souza ◽  
Júlio Carepa de Sousa ◽  
Tatiana Araújo Pereira ◽  
Ana Maria do Amaral Cerqueira ◽  
...  

SummaryThe development of alloantibodies that inhibit or neutralise the function of factor VIII is considered the most serious complication of the treatment of congenital haemophilia A. In order to describe their course without immune tolerance induction (ITI), we documented data on all performed inhibitor tests with dates as well as on clotting factor infusions of all consecutive patients who were treated in our centre between 1993 and 2006. Patients were tested every 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6–7.8). A ‘sustained negative inhibitor status’ was defined as consistent non-positive inhibitor measurements for two years or longer. A total of 60/486 (12%) patients tested had a positive inhibitor titre in two or more occasions. Most of the patients (56%) with a maximum inhibitor titre of < 5 Bethesda unit (BU)/ml (named “low titre inhibitor”) developed a sustained negative inhibitor status. Among patients with high (5–9.9 BU/ml) and very high (≥ 10 BU/ ml) inhibitor titres, the proportions were 50% and 3%, respectively. Our findings suggest that ITI might not be needed for all patients with non-transient inhibitors, especially when their maximum inhibitor titre is below 10 BU/ml. Further studies in countries where ITI is not available are needed to examine predictors of the natural sustained negative inhibitor status.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9522-9522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith Pelster ◽  
Stephen K. Gruschkus ◽  
Roland Bassett ◽  
Dan S. Gombos ◽  
Michael Shephard ◽  
...  

9522 Background: UM is the most common primary intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Approximately 40-50% of patients (pts) with UM will ultimately develop metastatic disease. There is currently no standard approach for metastatic UM. Early studies of single agent immunotherapy (IO) in metastatic UM have yielded meager results. Combination checkpoint inhibitor IO has the potential to improve response rates and survival. Herein, we report the safety and efficacy of ipi/nivo in metastatic UM. Methods: We performed a single-arm phase II study in metastatic UM (CA184-187) for pts with at least 1 measureable lesion and ECOG PS 0-1. Any number of prior treatments were permitted. Pts received nivolumab 1mg/kg IV plus ipilimumab 3mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for a total of 4 doses; maintenance nivolumab was dosed 3mg/kg every 2 weeks or 480mg IV every 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was best overall response rate (BORR) as determined by irRC. Secondary endpoints were median progression free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), and one-year OS. Results: As of the January 31, 2019 data cutoff, 39 pts were enrolled. 35 pts received at least one treatment and were evaluable for toxicity. 5 pts were inevaluable for response due to lack of follow-up imaging, leaving 30 pts evaluable for efficacy. 32 pts (91%) experienced any adverse event (AE), and 29 pts (83%) experienced any treatment related AE (TRAE). Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 14 pts (40%). 10 pts (29%) were removed from the study due to AEs. There were no treatment-related deaths. Median duration of follow up is 60.5 weeks. 19 pts (63%) completed all 4 cycles of ipi/nivo; median duration of treatment was 16 weeks. The BORR was partial response for 5 pts (17%), stable disease (SD) for 16 pts (53%), and progression of disease for 9 pts (30%). 8 pts had SD for at least 6 months. Median PFS was 26 weeks. Median OS was 83 weeks (1.6 years), and one-year OS was 62%. Conclusions: Full results of ipi/nivo safety and efficacy including immune-related AE and clinical characteristics of the responders will be presented at the meeting. Preliminary translational tumor work including RNA analysis has been performed on a subset of responders. Clinical trial information: NCT01585194.


2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (07) ◽  
pp. 32-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Schmidt ◽  
Kerstin Brettschneider ◽  
Jörg Kahle ◽  
Aleksander Orlowski ◽  
Karin Becker-Peters ◽  
...  

SummaryFollowing replacement therapy with coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), up to 30 % of haemophilia A patients develop FVIII-specific inhibitory antibodies (FVIII inhibitors). Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is not always successful, resulting in a need for alternative treatments for FVIII inhibitor-positive patients. As tolerance induction in the course of ITI appears to involve the formation of anti-idiotypes specific for anti-FVIII antibodies, such anti-idiotypes might be used to restore haemostasis in haemophilia A patients with FVIII inhibitors. We isolated antiidiotypic antibody fragments (scFvs) binding to murine FVIII inhibitors 2-76 and 2-77 from phage-displayed libraries. FVIII inhibitor/anti-idiotype interactions were very specific as no cross-reactivity with other FVIII inhibitors or isotype controls was observed. ScFvs blocked binding of FVIII inhibitors to FVIII and neutralised their cognate inhibitors in vitro and a monoclonal mouse model. In addition, scFv JkH5 specific for FVIII inhibitor 2-76 stained 2-76-producing hybridoma cells. JkH5 residues R52 and Y226, located in complementary determining regions, were identified as crucial for the JkH5/2-76 interaction using JkH5 alanine mutants. SPR spectroscopy revealed that JkH5 interacts with FVIII inhibitor 2-76 with nanomolar affinity. Thus, FVIII inhibitorspecific, high-affinity anti-idiotypes can be isolated from phagedisplayed libraries and neutralise their respective inhibitors. Furthermore, we show that anti-idiotypic scFvs might be utilised to specifically target inhibitor-specific B cells. Hence, a pool of anti-idiotypes could enable the reestablishment of haemostasis in the presence of FVIII inhibitors in patients or even allow the depletion of inhibitors by targeting inhibitor-specific B cell populations.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5037-5037
Author(s):  
Neha Bhatnagar ◽  
Kate Khair ◽  
Ri Liesner ◽  
Alice Wilkinson ◽  
Larisa Belyanskaya

Abstract Introduction and Objective: Inhibitors to coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) are the most serious complication of haemophilia A treatment. Previously untreated patients (PUPs) are at the greatest risk of inhibitors, which generally occur within the first 20 exposure days (ED) to FVIII. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only clinically proven strategy for eradication of inhibitors. We present a case series of six PUPs with severe haemophilia A and inhibitors who underwent ITI with simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®), a 4th generation human cell-line-derived recombinant FVIII approved for treatment of haemophilia A. Materials and Methods: Six male PUPs with severe haemophilia A who developed FVIII inhibitors after treatment with simoctocog alfa were started on ITI with simoctocog alfa. Primarily, we assessed the success of simoctocog alfa in patients with inhibitors. Success of ITI was determined based on undetectable inhibitor titre (< 0.6 BU/ml), FVIII recovery ≥ 66% and half-life ≥ 6 hours. Secondary objectives were to assess bleeding rate, tolerability and safety in patients with inhibitors treated with simoctocog alfa ITI. Results: The age of the patients at the start of ITI ranged from 8 to 186 months. Four of the patients were Caucasian, and two were African. All patients had a F8 mutation associated with high risk of ITI failure and two patients had an additional risk factor for ITI failure. The number of EDs prior to inhibitor development ranged from 9 to 33, and the peak inhibitor titre ranged from 0.9 to 114 BU. For ITI, five patients were treated with 100 IU/kg simoctocog alfa daily, and one with 90 IU/kg every other day. One patient achieved complete tolerisation and is now on prophylaxis at normal doses, having achieved an undetectable inhibitor titre after 9 months. This was despite an inhibitor titre ≥ 10 BU/mL at ITI start, which is considered a poor prognosis factor for ITI success. Three other patients achieved an undetectable inhibitor titre after 1, 6 and 18 months of ITI, and FVIII recovery has normalised but half-life remains short and they are on weaning doses as the half-life extends. One patient discontinued ITI with simoctocog alfa after 15 months due to an increasing inhibitor level. This patient was 15 years old at ITI start, and older age is associated with poor ITI outcome. Additionally, his haemophilia A was untreated for 15 years, during which time he developed severe arthropathy. One patient, who started ITI 3 months ago, has an ongoing inhibitor titre and continues on ITI with simoctocog alfa. Conclusions: In a case series of six patients treated with simoctocog alfa for ITI, who all had poor prognosis factors for ITI success, four patients (67%) to date have achieved an undetectable inhibitor titre. These data suggest that ITI with simoctocog alfa may be an effective treatment approach in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Disclosures Khair: Shire, SOBI, Pfizer, Roche, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; shire, SOBI, Pfizer, Roche: Research Funding. Liesner:Roche: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Other: Clinical study investigator for NuProtect Study (Octapharma sponsored), Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau. Belyanskaya:Octapharma AG: Employment.


1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
D J Perry ◽  
F G H Hill

Conventional methods for determining inhibitor levels in haemophiliacs are time consuming and labour intensive. The agarose gel technique of Jorquera et al. (1) has been modified and standardized to measure human and porcine inhibitors to VIII:C.26 samples from 12 haemophiliacs with inhibitors were analysed and in all cases antibody to human and porcine VIII:C was detected.Six haemophiliac patients with 'high responder-type' inhibitors were studied using stored plasma and the rise in antibody titres to both human and porcine VIII:C was determined sequentially during treatment with human FVIII concentrate.One patient (J. C.) had received a single treatment with porcine concentrate (Hyate:C) with no rise in porcine VIII:C.In 5 of 6 patients both porcine and human inhibitor titres rose but the porcine levels were less than the human. However, in the remaining high responder patient (I. I.) with previously mild haemophilia and no exposure to porcine FVIII, the rise in porcine antibody titre greatly exceeded that of human. This patient has continued to be treated with human FVIII concentrate during which time the human inhibitor titres have fallen more than the porcine.This method is simple to perform and has the advantage that both human and porcine inhibitor titres can be easily and quickly assessed so that the most appropriate therapy can be given.1. Jorquera JI, Carmona E, Aznar JA, Peiro A and Sanchez-Cuenca JM. (1985) A Standardized Method for Measuring Anti-FVIII:C Inhibitors in Haemophilia A by Coagulation Inhibition in Agarose Gel. Thromb. Haemostas. 54(2): 377-380.


2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (09) ◽  
pp. 445-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Leissinger ◽  
Cassandra Josephson ◽  
Barbara Konkle ◽  
Rebecca Kruse-Jarres ◽  
Margaret Ragni ◽  
...  

SummaryThe development of antibodies against infused factor VIII (FVIII) in patients with haemophilia A is a serious complication leading to poorly controlled bleeding and increased morbidity. No treatment has been proven to reduce high titre antibodies in patients who fail immune tolerance induction or are not candidates for it. The Rituximab for the Treatment of Inhibitors in Congenital Hemophilia A (RICH) study was a phase II trial to assess whether rituximab can reduce anamnestic FVIII antibody (inhibitor) titres. Male subjects with severe congenital haemophilia A and an inhibitor titre ≥5 Bethesda Units/ml (BU) following a FVIII challenge infusion received rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for weeks 1 through 4. Post-rituximab inhibitor titres were measured monthly from week 6 through week 22 to assess treatment response. Of 16 subjects who received at least one dose of rituximab, three (18.8%) met the criteria for a major response, defined as a fall in inhibitor titre to <5 BU, persisting after FVIII re-challenge. One subject had a minor response, defined as a fall in inhibitor titre to <5 BU, increasing to 5–10 BU after FVIII re-challenge, but <50% of the original peak inhibitor titre. Rituximab is useful in lowering inhibitor levels in patients, but its effect as a solo treatment strategy is modest. Future studies are indicated to determine the role of rituximab as an adjunctive therapy in immune tolerisation strategies.Trial: “Rituximab for the Treatment of Inhibitors in Congenital Hemophilia A: The RICH Study. Registered as Clinical Trials.gov identifier- NCT00331006.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
Arpana Neopane ◽  
Mona Sharma ◽  
Sumugdha Rayamajhi

Introduction: Polyarthritis is a common presentation of patients attending medicine outpatient department. Among various causes Rheumatoid arthritis is the commonest and a well established case has distinct characteristic features. However the early presentation of this disease has not been clear thus leading to delay in treatment. The objectives of this study was to identify the various causes of polyarthritis in our clinical practice, discuss the varied clinical presentation of rheumatoid arthritis including early Rheumatoid arthritis and to evaluate the treatment response during one year follow up. Methods: Prospective longitudinal study conducted in a teaching hospital over a two years period Results: Rheumatoid arthritis was the commonest cause of polyarthritis (77.8%) with a period prevalence of 0.7%. Early presentation included atypical features like asymmetry, unilateral presentation, manifesting within 2 months to 2 years of diagnosis. 43% (n=18) of the patients had swelling and tenderness in overused joints 1.5 years prior to full clinical manifestation. Flitting or migratory joint pain not considered to be a feature of rheumatoid arthritis was also present in 14.3% (n=6) patients with mean duration of 1.5 years prior to full blown presentation. MCPJ (metacarpophalyngeal joints) and PIP (proximal interphalyngeal joints) were involved in 90%. Treatment response with Methotrexate as a single DMARD was good as compared with DAS 28 ESR score. Conclusions: RA is a common arthritis with varied clinical presentation. Recognition of early symptoms is needed for early diagnosis and initiation of DMARD. Methotrexate as a DMARD is effective and should be initiated early. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v10i2.6459 Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital July-Dec 2011 10(2) 22-28


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1512-1512
Author(s):  
Pu-Lin Luo ◽  
Steve K Austin ◽  
Daniel P Hart ◽  
Paul A Batty ◽  
Michael Laffan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare and potentially fatal bleeding disorder characterised by the development of autoantibodies directed against factor VIII. The optimal treatment for AHA remains uncertain and there is a paucity of published data to guide clinical practice. The EACH2 Registry has provided the largest observational dataset from 117 European centres on the management of AHA. The aim of this study is to provide retrospective analysis of the experience of all Haemophilia Centres across London on the management of AHA and compare it to the data presented in the EACH2 Registry. Method We performed a multicentre centre retrospective analysis of all AHA patients presenting between January 2009 and December 2012 to Haemophilia Centres across London. Data collected included demographics, aetiology, bleeding characteristics immunosuppression and haemostatic agents used to control the first bleeding episode. Results There were 65 patients identified. The median (IQR) age at diagnosis was 78 (57-85) years. At presentation, the median haemoglobin concentration, FVIII:C and inhibitor titre were 80 g/L (68-100), 2 IU/dl (0-5.5) and 13.0BU/ml(3.5-47 ). At presentation 48/65 patients demonstrated bleeding from multiple sites with 18/65 experiencing life-threatening bleeds. 4 patients had no evidence of clinical bleeding and there was no difference in haemoglobin level, baseline FVIII:C and peak inhibitor titre compared to those who bled(P>0.05). 50% of patients had idiopathic cause of AHA with malignancy being the second most common. Around 50% (33/65) of patients were treated with activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) alone and 19/65 patients alternated between aPCC and recombinant activated FVII (FVIIa). 6(9%) patients with bleeding symptoms were managed with tranexamic acid or desmopressin alone without bypassing agents. There median (IQR) time to treatment response (defined as days to factor VIII >50IU/dl or negative Bethesda) was 45(23-82) days. Single agent prednisolone was most common (32/64) immunosuppression used followed by combination therapy with prednisolone and cyclophosphamide (22/64). 87% of patients achieved treatment response. A higher proportion of patients (21/22) treated with prednisolone and cyclophosphamide achieved response compared to prednisolone alone (29/33). There was no difference in the days to response (83 vs 69 p=0.055), time to remission (days to stopping immunosuppression)(123 vs 1958 p=0.065), incidence of relapses (7/32 vs 5/22) or duration of sustained remission (264 vs 204 p= 0.42) between the 2 groups. 8 patients received rituximab in addition to prednisolone and/or cyclophosphamide and 3 was treated with rituximab alone. 16% (12/65) of patients relapsed. These patients exhibited a higher mean baseline and peak inhibitor (BU/ml) (140 vs 54 p=0.011, 143vs 64 p=0.03) There was no difference in the time to response (78vs94 p=0.50) between patients who relapsed compared to those who did not. Presenting inhibitor of >16BU was also associated with longer days to treatment response(121 vs 58 p=0.001) 70% of patients were alive at follow up with similar portions seen in the between the cyclophosphamide and prednisolone group and prednisolone only group. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Summary: Our study reinforced the findings of the EACH2 Registry that FVIII level and inhibitor tire did not correspond to the presence of bleeding or the severity of bleeding. However a low presenting inhibitor titre <16BU/ml was associated with faster inhibitor eradication and normalisation of FVIII. A higher baseline and peak inhibitor titre also influenced the rate of relapse. Bypassing agents were used to treat 91% of our patients with clinical bleeding, unlike only 70% in the EACH2 registry. 70 % of patients in the registry were treated with rFVIIa alone, which was observed in only 8% of our patients. The majority of our patients receive aPCC or alternating treatment between aPCC and rFVIIa. This selection preference for aPCC may be reflected by difference in the half life between the bypassing agents. In contrast to the EACH2 Registry, we did not observe a shorter time to treatment response, a reduction in relapse rate or an increase in duration of sustained remission with the addition of cyclophosphamide to prednisolone. Despite this, our study does concur with the EACH2 Registry that the final survival outcome was not affected by the choice of first line immunosuppression. Disclosures Luo: Grifols: Research Funding. Austin:Baxter: Speakers Bureau; Novonordisk: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hart:Baxter: Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Batty:Octapharma: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document