scholarly journals Quantitative Vestibular Function Testing in the Pediatric Population

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (03) ◽  
pp. 257-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Rodriguez ◽  
Kristen Janky
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Caloric Test ◽  
Vestibular Loss ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Ocular Vemp ◽  
Cervical Vemp ◽  
Vestibular Function Testing ◽  
Function Testing

AbstractQuantitative tests of vestibular function include the caloric test, cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP), rotary chair, and head impulse test, either at the bedside or utilizing video head impulse test (vHIT). The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of how to perform these tests in children, including which tests are recommended based on the child's age and any modifications or considerations that can be made. A variety of clinical measures have been recommended as screening measures for vestibular loss, which will be reviewed. Symptom questionnaires designed to assess the functional impact of dizziness and vestibular loss in children will also be discussed. If a child complains of dizziness or if vestibular loss is suspected (either by case history or positive screening measure), vestibular function testing is warranted. For vestibular function testing, children aged 0 to 2 years typically receive rotary chair, cervical VEMP, and vHIT if a remote system is available. For children aged 3 to 7 years, vHIT, cervical VEMP, and ocular VEMP are completed, and for children aged 8+ years, vHIT, caloric testing if vHIT is normal, and cervical and ocular VEMP are completed. For all children, modifications to testing can be made, as needed.

scholarly journals Effects of Device on Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) Gain

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (09) ◽  
pp. 778-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen L. Janky ◽  
Jessie N. Patterson ◽  
Neil T. Shepard ◽  
Megan L. A. Thomas ◽  
Julie A. Honaker
Keyword(s):  
Normal Control ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Vestibular Loss ◽  
Directional Bias ◽  
Horizontal Canal ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
Bilateral Vestibular Loss

AbstractNumerous video head impulse test (vHIT) devices are available commercially; however, gain is not calculated uniformly. An evaluation of these devices/algorithms in healthy controls and patients with vestibular loss is necessary for comparing and synthesizing work that utilizes different devices and gain calculations.Using three commercially available vHIT devices/algorithms, the purpose of the present study was to compare: (1) horizontal canal vHIT gain among devices/algorithms in normal control subjects; (2) the effects of age on vHIT gain for each device/algorithm in normal control subjects; and (3) the clinical performance of horizontal canal vHIT gain between devices/algorithms for differentiating normal versus abnormal vestibular function.Prospective.Sixty-one normal control adult subjects (range 20–78) and eleven adults with unilateral or bilateral vestibular loss (range 32–79).vHIT was administered using three different devices/algorithms, randomized in order, for each subject on the same day: (1) Impulse (Otometrics, Schaumberg, IL; monocular eye recording, right eye only; using area under the curve gain), (2) EyeSeeCam (Interacoustics, Denmark; monocular eye recording, left eye only; using instantaneous gain), and (3) VisualEyes (MicroMedical, Chatham, IL, binocular eye recording; using position gain).There was a significant mean difference in vHIT gain among devices/algorithms for both the normal control and vestibular loss groups. vHIT gain was significantly larger in the ipsilateral direction of the eye used to measure gain; however, in spite of the significant mean differences in vHIT gain among devices/algorithms and the significant directional bias, classification of “normal” versus “abnormal” gain is consistent across all compared devices/algorithms, with the exception of instantaneous gain at 40 msec. There was not an effect of age on vHIT gain up to 78 years regardless of the device/algorithm.These findings support that vHIT gain is significantly different between devices/algorithms, suggesting that care should be taken when making direct comparisons of absolute gain values between devices/algorithms.

Case Study: Depersonalization and Vestibular Impairment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yini Sun ◽  
Allison Coltisor ◽  
Gary P. Jacobson ◽  
Richard A. Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Episodic Vertigo ◽  
Data Collection And Analysis ◽  
Vestibular Function Testing ◽  
Function Testing

Abstract Background We describe herein the case of a patient whose primary complaints were episodic vertigo and “depersonalization,” a sensation of detachment from his own body. Purpose This case study aims to further clinical knowledge and insight into the clinical evaluation of vertiginous patients with complaints of depersonalization. Research Design This is a case study. Data Collection and Analysis A retrospective chart review of vestibular function testing done on a vertiginous patient with complaints of depersonalization was performed. Results Vestibular function testing revealed absent cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials on the left side with normal vHIT or video Head Impulse Test, videonystagmography, and rotational chair results, suggesting peripheral vestibular impairment isolated to the left saccule and utricle. Conclusion The otolith end organ impairment explains the patient's postural deviation to the left side during attempts to ambulate. We recommend that clinicians should be attentive to patient complaints of depersonalization and perform vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing to determine whether evidence of at least a unilateral peripheral otolith end organ impairment exists.

scholarly journals Evaluation of vestibular function using video Head Impulse Test, caloric test and VEMP in patients with vestibular neuritis

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 534-540
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Akutsu ◽  
Akemi Sugita-Kitajima ◽  
Koshi Mikami ◽  
Yujin Kato ◽  
Fumihiro Mochizuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Vestibular Neuritis ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Caloric Test ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Head Impulse

Vestibular semicircular canal function as detected by video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) is essentially unchanged in people with Parkinson’s disease compared to healthy controls

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Kim E. Hawkins ◽  
Elodie Chiarovano ◽  
Serene S. Paul ◽  
Ann M Burgess ◽  
Hamish G. MacDougall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Semicircular Canal ◽  
Neurodegenerative Disorder ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

BACKGROUND: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common multi-system neurodegenerative disorder with possible vestibular system dysfunction, but prior vestibular function test findings are equivocal. OBJECTIVE: To report and compare vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain as measured by the video head impulse test (vHIT) in participants with PD, including tremor dominant and postural instability/gait dysfunction phenotypes, with healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Forty participants with PD and 40 age- and gender-matched HC had their vestibular function assessed. Lateral and vertical semicircular canal VOR gains were measured with vHIT. VOR canal gains between PD participants and HC were compared with independent samples t-tests. Two distinct PD phenotypes were compared to HC using Tukey’s ANOVA. The relationship of VOR gain with PD duration, phenotype, severity and age were investigated using logistic regression. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in vHIT VOR gain for lateral or vertical canals. There was no evidence of an effect of PD severity, phenotype or age on VOR gains in the PD group. CONCLUSION: The impulsive angular VOR pathways are not significantly affected by the pathophysiological changes associated with mild to moderate PD.

Vestibular function assessment of Susac syndrome patients by the video head impulse test and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 393-399
Author(s):  
Yahav Oron ◽  
Ophir Handzel ◽  
Zohar Habot-Wilner ◽  
Keren Regev ◽  
Arnon Karni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Susac Syndrome

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (retino-cochleo-cerebral vasculopathy, SuS) is an autoimmune endotheliopathy characterized by the clinical triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusions and sensorineural hearing loss. In contrast to data regarding auditory function, data measuring vestibular function is sparse and the cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the video head impulse test (vHIT) can serve as a confirmatory assessment of vestibulocochlear dysfunction in cases of suspected SuS. METHODS: Seven patients diagnosed with SuS underwent pure tone audiometry, a word recognition test, cVEMPs and the vHIT. RESULTS: Five patients were diagnosed with definite SuS, and two with probable SuS. Two patients were asymptomatic for hearing loss or tinnitus, and no sensorineural hearing loss was detected by audiograms. Four patients complained of tinnitus, and three patients reported experiencing vertigo. Three patients had abnormal cVEMPs results. All seven patients’ vHIT results were normal, except for patient #2, who was one of the three who complained of vertigo. The calculated gain of her left anterior semicircular canal was 0.5, without saccades. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe the results of the vHIT and cVEMPs among a group of patients with SuS. The results suggest that the vHIT should not be the only exam used to assess the function of the vestibular system of SuS patients.

Vestibular assessment of a patient with myasthenia gravis: case report 

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 65-70
Author(s):  
Kenneth Chua ◽  
Sakumura J
Keyword(s):  
Myasthenia Gravis ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Symptom Checklist ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Functional Impairments ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Vestibular Assessment ◽  
Vestibular Function Testing ◽  
Function Testing

Vestibular Assessment in patients with Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is challenging, as diagnostic evaluation requires good recording of eye movements. Reports on Vestibular Function Testing (VFT) in MG patients have been scant and it is arguable that VFT will have little clinical value in the MG population. A 75-year-old man, with late onset acquired autoimmune MG presented with dizziness for evaluation. He completed VFT with no significant abnormalities in all tests and was elated to have vestibular ruled out as a contributing factor to his dizziness and imbalance. However, his functional impairments were still addressed and managed regardless of the test results. MG is a heterogenous condition that may be well-controlled with treatment. Patients with dizziness can still be diagnostically evaluated to rule in or out a vestibular involvement and should not be precluded from VFT. Patients should also be assessed for their functional impairments and not based on symptom checklist and objective test results alone. Hence, patients with normal VFT results can still benefit from a hybrid of vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) with focus on habituation.

Acute vertigo in the ENT emergency

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-155
Author(s):  
Václav Albrecht ◽  
Lukáš Školoudík ◽  
Peter Sila ◽  
Jan Mejzlík ◽  
Michal Janouch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Vestibular Testing ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Summary Introduction: Acute vertigo ranks among the common reasons for visiting the emergency department. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of peripheral vestibular syndrome (PVS) in patients with acute vertigo examined at the ENT emergency department and to compare the agreement of physical ENT examination with video-assisted vestibular testing. Methods: Patients eamined at the ENT emergency department from January to December 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients who underwent basic ENT examination without video-assisted vestibular testing form group A. The patients who underwent basic ENT examination which was followed by video head impulse test (vHIT) and videonystagmography in the next four days form group B. Results: A total of 117 patients with acute vertigo were included in group A, PVS was found in 31 patients (27%). In total, 50 patients were included in group B; PVS was found in 15 patients (30%), vestibular neuronitis was dia­gnosed most often (10 patients). The difference in the dia­gnosis of PVS by basic ENT examination (27 patients, 54%) and by video-assisted vestibular testing (15 patients, 30%) was statistically significant (P = 0.0030). The gain of the lateral (P = 0.0101) and superior (P = 0.0043) semicircular canal proved to be statistically significant, while vHIT was lower in PVS in comparison to other causes of vertigo. Conclusion: After basic ENT examination, PVS as a cause of acute vertigo was dia­gnosed in 27%. Video-assisted vestibular testing proved a statistically significant lower incidence of PVS in comparison to basic ENT examination. Accessibility of video- -assisted vestibular testing in the emergency department might allow for higher accuracy in the dia­gnosis of acute vertigo. Key words acute vertigo – vestibular function tests – video head impulse test – videonystagmography

Vestibular function testing in the 21st century

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally M. Rosengren ◽  
Allison S. Young ◽  
Rachael L. Taylor ◽  
Miriam S. Welgampola
Keyword(s):  
21St Century ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Vestibular Function Testing ◽  
Function Testing

Video Head Impulse Testing: From Bench to Bedside

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (01) ◽  
pp. 005-017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Chen ◽  
G. Michael Halmagyi
Keyword(s):  
Gold Standard ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Search Coil ◽  
Lateral Canal ◽  
Visual Interaction ◽  
Peripheral Vestibulopathy ◽  
First Time ◽  
Robust Evidence

AbstractOver 30 years ago, the head impulse test (HIT) was measured with search coil recordings and it provided robust evidence for a new test of vestibular function that could detect impairment of a single semicircular canal, that is, the lateral canal. Over the next two decades, the diagnostic spectrum of HIT was expanded to the testing of vertical canals, differentiation of central from peripheral vestibulopathy, and incorporation of visual interaction—the suppressed head impulse. However, HIT measurement was limited to very few specialized laboratories that were able to maintain the time-consuming and expensive operation of the scleral search coil system, which is the gold standard in eye movement recording. The video HIT (vHIT) was validated for the first time over 10 years ago, against the search coils, and its introduction into dizzy clinics worldwide has revolutionized the practice of neuro-otology. Here we review the basic physiology, practical aspects, and clinical application of the vHIT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document