scholarly journals Intramedullary Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures Using CAGE-DR Implant

2018 ◽  
Vol 07 (05) ◽  
pp. 358-365
Author(s):  
Schneider Rancy ◽  
Stephanie Malliaris ◽  
Eric Bogner ◽  
Scott Wolfe
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Fracture Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Pain Scores

Purpose CAGE-DR implant is a novel Food and Drug Administration approved intramedullary fracture fixation device used for distal radius fractures. We examine a series of 22 patients and report the outcomes with this device. Materials and Methods A total of 24 patients with distal radius fractures (8 articular AO type C1/C2; 16 extra-articular AO type A2/A3) underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using CAGE-DR implant by a single surgeon. Data including fracture type, angle of displacement, radiographic consolidation, grip strength, wrist range of motion (ROM), patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded at time of surgery and at standard follow-up. Results All 24 patients underwent uneventful ORIF. At first follow-up visit (9 days), all patients had full digital ROM (measured as 0 cm tip-to-palm distance). Two patients were lost to follow-up. Eighteen of the remaining 22 patients had sufficient radiographic follow-up and all 18 demonstrated healing. At latest follow-up (mean 9.7 months, range, 3–20), VAS pain scores averaged 0.6 (range, 0–8) and PRWE averaged 12.1 (range, 0–53.5). Grip strength of the operated hand averaged 58 lbs (range, 20–130). ROM included: wrist flexion 73° (50–95), wrist extension 78° (60–110), pronation 77° (60–90), supination 79° (60–90), ulnar deviation 31° (5–45), and radial deviation 17° (10–30). Three patients underwent screw removal to prevent tendon irritation. One patient underwent hardware removal due to prominence on imaging but was asymptomatic. There were otherwise no major complications, including complex regional pain syndrome, in the series to date. Conclusion The CAGE-DR fracture fixation system is a promising alternative to established methods of distal radius internal fixation. This series has a low reported pain score starting immediately postoperatively and a low complication rate. This novel device is a promising option for internal fixation of displaced distal radius fractures with a low complication profile. Level of Evidence This is a level IV, therapeutic study.

The influence of late displacement in distal radius fractures on function, grip strength, range of motion and quality of life

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Å. Wadsten ◽  
G. O. Sjödén ◽  
G. G. Buttazzoni ◽  
C. Buttazzoni ◽  
E. Englund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Pain Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Level Of Evidence

Late displacement of distal radius fractures, still in acceptable radiological position after 1–2 weeks, occurs in approximately one-third of cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of late displacement on the functional outcome and quality of life at 1 year in non-operatively treated distal radius fractures. One hundred and seventy five unilateral conservatively treated distal radius fractures with minimal displacement after 10–14 days were finally evaluated in the study. Follow-up included radiographs at 3 months and clinical examination 1 year after the fracture. Final radiographic parameters, grip strength, range of motion, QuickDASH, EQ-5D and pain visual analogue scale were evaluated with multivariate analysis. Late displacement occurred in 28% of the cases and was associated with loss of grip strength and range of motion. No significant differences were seen in the outcome questionnaires. Level of evidence: II

Analysis of Our Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures in Adults: Are We Over Operating?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George W.V. Cross ◽  
Ramandeep S. Saini ◽  
Mohammed Monem ◽  
Rajesh Sofat
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Plain Radiograph ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
British Society ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Radiological Parameters ◽  
New Guidelines

Abstract Background Fractures of the distal radius are a common injury. The British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) and The British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) have released new guidelines outlining the management of these fractures, specifically identifying “thresholds for intervention,” based on radiological parameters for management with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Questions/Purposes Have our distal radius fractures (DRFs), previously managed with ORIF, met the new guidelines' thresholds for intervention, based on radiological parameters? Patients and Methods A retrospective assessment of DRFs treated with ORIF was performed between January 2017 and August 2018. Patients were categorized into three cohorts based on their age. The five radiological parameters of ulnar variance, dorsal tilt, radial inclination, radial height, and intra-articular step were measured on the initial plain radiograph, “pre-manipulation film,” postplaster application radiograph, and “post-manipulation film.”These were compared with the “thresholds for intervention” outlined in the BOA/BSSH guidelines. Results A total of 94 patients underwent an ORIF with a mean age of 56 years (range 17–86 years). As many as 75.74% of patients on the ”pre-manipulation film” met the “threshold for intervention” on at least one radiological parameter, while 53.57% of patients on the “post-manipulation” met at least one “threshold for intervention.” Dorsal tilt was the parameter that most often met the threshold in both films at 53.37% and 40.11%, respectively. Conclusion Within our trust, there is a tendency to over manage the distal radius fracture with ORIF, potentially resulting in unnecessary operations. Education surrounding the new guidelines will better serve our decision-making. Level of Evidence This is a level III study.

scholarly journals Preexisting Carpal and Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis Has No Impact on Function after Distal Radius Fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 301-306
Author(s):  
Jonah Davies ◽  
Hugo Centomo ◽  
Stéphane Leduc ◽  
Pierre Beaumont ◽  
G.-Yves Laflamme ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Treatment Type ◽  
Significant Difference

Background Functional outcomes of distal radius fractures vary widely regardless of treatment methods. Purpose This study aims to verify whether preexisting carpal and carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) will negatively impact wrist functional outcome in patients with distal radius fractures. Patients and Methods A retrospective case–control study was done using a prospective trauma database. Patients were matched 1:1 in two groups based on the presence of wrist or carpal arthritis (OA). The groups were matched for sex, follow-up, and treatment type. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year and functional outcomes were assessed using validated scores. Results A total of 61 patients were included. Mean age was 63 years (range: 20–85) and average follow-up was 26 months. There were 31 patients in the OA+ group and 30 in the OA− group. Forty-one patients were treated surgically and 20 nonoperatively. None of the patients in the OA− developed OA during follow-up. Both groups were comparable for sex, residual deformity, and follow-up. There was no significant difference for the visual analog scale, Short Form-12, Quick Disability Arm Shoulder Hand, and Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation, or for radiographic outcomes. Conclusion Preexisting OA in the wrist or CMC does not seem to impact outcomes of distal radius fractures, regardless of treatment, age, or sex. Although this is a negative study, the results are important to help counsel patients with distal radius fractures. Further work must be done to identify other potential causes for negative outcomes. Level of Evidence Level III, prognostic study.

Dual Plating Technique for Volar Rim Fracture of the Distal Radius Using DePuy-Synthes 2.0 m and 2.4 mm Locking Plates

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
pp. 423-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Abe ◽  
Masahiro Suzuki ◽  
Hiromasa Wakita
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Ulnar Variance ◽  
Locking Plates ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Radial Inclination ◽  
The Mean

Background: To assess the surgical results of distal radius fractures with the involvement of a volar rim fragment using the DePuy-Synthes 2.0 mm and 2.4 mm locking plates.Methods: Subjects were six women and one man of average age 57 years (range, 31–83 y) and a mean follow-up period of 9 months (range, 5–19 mo) with AO B3 (volar shearing) distal radius fractures. Time of the procedure, physical examination of wrist range of motion, grip strength compared with the contralateral healthy wrist, and radiographic evaluation (volar tilt, radial inclination, and ulnar variance) were evaluated. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS: 0 points represents no pain, 100 points represents the worst pain possible) and the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH, 0 = no disability, 100 = extreme disability) were completed by patients at the final follow-up.Results: The average time of the procedure was 74 min. There were no perioperative complications. Average radiographic measures were: volar tilt, 8°; radial inclination, 23°, and ulnar variance, 0 mm. Wrist range of motion averaged 63° in wrist extension (range, 55–80°) and 55° in wrist flexion (range, 45–65°). Grip strength averaged 81% of the contralateral side at final evaluation (range, 67–100%). The mean QuickDASH score was 3.0 points (range, 0–9.1 points) and the mean VAS for pain was 9.3 at final follow-up.Conclusions: Open reduction internal fixation with the DePuy-Synthes 2.0 mm and 2.4 mm locking plates is an effective means of fixing a distal radius fracture that includes a volar rim fragment without interfering with flexor tendon gliding.

TREATMENT WITH OR WITHOUT INTERNAL FIXATION FOR ULNAR STYLOID BASE FRACTURES ACCOMPANIED BY DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES FIXED WITH VOLAR LOCKING PLATE

Hand Surgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 181-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukichi Zenke ◽  
Akinori Sakai ◽  
Toshihisa Oshige ◽  
Shiro Moritani ◽  
Toshitaka Nakamura
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Ulnar Styloid ◽  
Fixation Group ◽  
Significant Difference

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment results, with and without internal fixation of ulnar styloid base fractures associated with acute distal radius fractures. A total of 48 patients were enrolled, including 20 patients treated by internal fixation (fixation group) and 28 treated without internal fixation (non-fixation group). The evaluated parameters were postoperative range of motion, grip strength, DASH score, and the presence or absence of ulnar wrist pain over time. The outcome was assessed as "excellent" in 15 patients of the fixation group and 21 patients of the non-fixation group, and "good" in five patients of the fixation group and seven patients of the non-fixation group. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes or any of the parameters at the final evaluation between the two groups. However, the grip strength was significantly better in the non-fixation group than in the fixation group until 12 weeks postoperatively. The overall clinical outcome was good in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups.

scholarly journals Ten Years’ Follow-Up on Combined Palmar and Dorsal Internal Fixation of Complex Distal Radius Fractures

Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (18) ◽  
pp. e3509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Daniel Iselin ◽  
Anne-Sophie Massy-Budmiger ◽  
Raoul A. Droeser ◽  
Tobias R. Mett ◽  
Reto Babst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures

scholarly journals Volar Locking Plate for Distal Radius Fractures: Functional Outcomes and Complication Rates with a Minimum of One Year Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (05) ◽  
pp. 358-365
Author(s):  
Kastanis G ◽  
Pantouvaki A ◽  
Kapsetakis P ◽  
Spyrantis M ◽  
Magarakis G ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Locking Plate ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
One Year ◽  
Quick Dash

Distal radius fractures (DRF) are the most common type of fractures of the upper extremities with an incidence of 44% of all types of forearm and hand fractures. In unstable DRF, the aim of surgical treatment is to restore a functional wrist. Volar locking plate is supported in literature as a promising surgical method in treatment of these fractures. The aim of this study is to analyze the type and complication rate with applied volar locking plate, the percentage of revision surgery and the functional outcomes in a minimum of one year follow up. Material &Methods: 104 fractures in 98 patients with a mean range of 48,5 years-old age underwent for unstable distal radius fractures with volar locking plate. The main cause was simple fall to an outstretched hand. In ten cases the fracture was open while in 28 cases the DRF was accompanied with ulnar styloid. All fractures classified by AO/OTA in A2-3 27 cases, B1-3 in 45 and C1-3 in 32 cases. The majority of patients were operated within 48-72 hours after injury. In all cases an extended flexor carpi radialis approach was performed and a volar locking plate was applied in all DRF’s. In sixteen cases with base of ulnar styloid fractures, low profile locking plates were applied, while in the rest of patients Kirschner wires were used. Postoperatively all patients followed a standard protocol rehabilitation program with passive and active motion of fingers and wrist. Results: Patients were evaluated according to complication (type and rate), time to fracture union, range of motion, Visual analogue pain scale, Quick Dash Score and patients-rated wrist evaluation score. Complications were distinguished in major and minor. Patients under 60 years-old with type fracture A2-3 and B1-3 showed better range of motion and grip strength than patients over 65 years old. In cases with type fractures C1-3 and age over 65 years old, ROM and grip strength decreased compared with the unilateral side. The percentage of complication and reoperation appeared more increased in type C1-3 related to the other two types of fractures. Finally the mean Quick DASH was 11,1±12,8, RPWE was 9.8±13,6 and the range of motion was in extension 75,2±7,3, in flexion 74±8,9, in pronation 85,6±1,9, in supination 88,5±2,4 in radial deviation 9,8±1,2 and in ulnar deviation 41,1±4,6 and grip strength was an average of 84,7% of uninjured hand. Conclusion: Unstable fractures required operative treatment with volar locking plate to be the gold standard in recently years. Unfortunately VPL presents postoperative complications related with plate and screw position with comminuted fracture or soft tissue damage which cannot be ignored, and for these reasons may be inadequate for all types of distal radius fractures.

Percutaneous pinning versus volar locking plate internal fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: a meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Peng ◽  
Yuan-xiang Liu ◽  
Zhen-yu Wan
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Open Reduction Internal Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Percutaneous Pinning ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Randomised Controlled

This meta-analysis compared outcomes between percutaneous pinning/wiring and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with locking plates for treatment of unstable distal radius fractures. Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched through December 30, 2015. Twenty randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised two-arm studies were included. Outcomes included scores of Disabilities of the Arms, Shoulders and Hands (DASH), visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, and patient rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score, as well as range of motion (ROM) and complication incidence. ORIF/plating was associated with lower DASH scores but longer procedure time, while there was no difference between the two methods with respect to VAS pain score and PRWE score. The overall incidence of complications, including complex regional pain syndrome, was higher with pinning/wiring, though the incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome and nerve defects was not different. Supination and grip strength were better with ORIF. Radiographically, ulnar variation was greater with pinning/wiring. These results suggest that ORIF/plating is the preferred method of managing unstable distal radius fractures. Level of evidence: II

Mid-Term Functional Outcome after Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 238-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Shimura ◽  
Akimoto Nimura ◽  
Koji Fujita ◽  
Takashi Miyamoto
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Locking Plate ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The volar locking plate is frequently used in the fixation of unstable distal radius fractures, but despite this there is a paucity of mid to long term outcome studies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid-term functional outcomes of elderly patients treated with a volar locking plate for unstable distal radius fractures. Methods: Thirty-two patients with a mean age of 74.1 (range, 65–85) years were followed for a mean of 39.1 (range, 30–81) months. Patients with follow-up periods of < 24 months were excluded from this study to investigate the mid-term clinical outcomes. The Mayo wrist score (MWS), grip strength and wrist range of motion were retrospectively reviewed at 12 months, 24 months and the latest follow-up (mean 39.1 months). Osteoarthritis status according to the system of Knirk and Jupiter was assessed at 24 months. Results: Significant improvements in MWS and grip strength were observed between 12 and 24 months but not between 24 months and the final follow-up. There was no significant difference in wrist range of motion between 12 and 24 months. The MWS of 14 patients with radiographic signs of osteoarthritis was not significantly different from that of 18 patients without radiographic signs of osteoarthritis. Conclusions: Elderly patients treated with the volar locking plate showed improved MWS and grip strength postoperatively after 12 months. Improvement in grip strength was slower than range of motion.

scholarly journals Does circumferential casting prevent fracture redisplacement in reduced distal radius fractures? A retrospective multicentre study

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Berger ◽  
B. Barvelink ◽  
M. Reijman ◽  
T. Gosens ◽  
G. A. Kraan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multicentre Study ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Academic Hospitals ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Background This study evaluates whether a circumferential cast compared to a plaster splint leads to less fracture redisplacement in reduced extra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs). Methods This retrospective multicentre study was performed in four hospitals (two teaching hospitals and two academic hospitals). Adult patients with a displaced extra-articular DRF, treated with closed reduction, were included. Patients were included from a 5-year period (January 2012–January 2017). According to the hospital protocol, fractures were immobilized with a below elbow circumferential cast (CC) or a plaster splint (PS). The primary outcome concerned the difference in the occurrence of fracture redisplacement at one-week follow-up. Results A total of 500 patients were included in this study (PS n = 184, CC n = 316). At one-week follow-up, fracture redisplacement occurred in 52 patients (17%) treated with a CC compared to 53 patients (29%) treated with a PS. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Conclusion This study suggests that treatment of reduced DRFs with a circumferential cast might cause less fracture redisplacement at 1-week follow-up compared to treatment with a plaster splint. Level of Evidence Level III, Retrospective study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document