Ablation in Primary Liver Tumors

2019 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 107-116
Author(s):  
D. Putzer ◽  
P. Schullian ◽  
R. Bale

Minimal invasive thermal ablation techniques have a key role in the treatment regimen of primary liver tumors. These relatively low-risk procedures are established in nonresectable liver tumors and even challenge the surgical approach, which is regarded as first-line treatment in eligible patients.The location and size of the liver tumor, the applied ablation, and guidance technique are crucial for treatment outcome. The confirmation of an adequate ablation zone including sufficient tumor overlap and a safety margin (A0 ablation analogous to R0 resection) is crucial to minimize local recurrence rates and improve survival. A variety of different ablation devices is available. The outcome of conventional computed tomography- or ultrasound-guided thermal ablation in small lesions is well comparable to surgery. However, in liver lesions with large diameter overlapping ablation zones are required to ensure an adequate ablation margin. Therefore, stereotactic techniques in combination with a multiple needle approach, three-dimensional trajectory planning, and image fusion for intraoperative treatment evaluation have been successfully introduced.

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 644
Author(s):  
Gregor Laimer ◽  
Peter Schullian ◽  
Reto Bale

Thermal ablation is an emerging, potentially curative approach in treating primary and metastatic liver cancer. Different technologies are available, with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) being the most widely used. Regardless of the technique, destruction of the entire tumor, including an adequate safety margin, is key. In conventional single-probe US- or CT-guided thermal ablation, the creation of such large necrosis zones is often hampered by technical limitations, especially for large tumors (i.e., >2–3 cm). These limitations have been overcome by stereotactic RFA (SRFA): a multiple needle approach with 3D treatment planning and precise stereotactic needle placement combined with intraprocedural image fusion of pre- and post-interventional CT scans for verification of treatment success. With these sophisticated tools and advanced techniques, the spectrum of locally curable liver malignancies can be dramatically increased. Thus, we strongly believe that stereotactic thermal ablation can become a cornerstone in the treatment of liver malignancies, as it offers all the benefits of a minimally invasive method while providing oncological outcomes comparable to surgery. This article provides an overview of current stereotactic techniques for thermal ablation, summarizes the available clinical evidence for this approach, and discusses its advantages.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 685
Author(s):  
Philipp K. Haber ◽  
Christoph Maier ◽  
Anika Kästner ◽  
Linda Feldbrügge ◽  
Santiago Andres Ortiz Galindo ◽  
...  

Minimal-invasive techniques are increasingly applied in clinical practice and have contributed towards improving postoperative outcomes. While comparing favorably with open surgery in terms of safety, the occurrence of severe complications remains a grave concern. To date, no objective predictive system has been established to guide clinicians in estimating complication risks as the relative contribution of general patient health, liver function and surgical parameters remain unclear. Here, we perform a single-center analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection for primary hepatic malignancies since 2010. Among the 210 patients identified, 32 developed major complications. Several independent predictors were identified through a multivariate analysis, defining a preoperative model: diabetes, history of previous hepatectomy, surgical approach, alanine aminotransferase levels and lesion entity. The addition of operative time and whether conversion was required significantly improved predictions and were thus incorporated into the postoperative model. Both models were able to identify patients with major complications with acceptable performance (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for a preoperative model = 0.77 vs. postoperative model = 0.80). Internal validation was performed and confirmed the discriminatory ability of the models. An easily accessible online tool was deployed in order to estimate probabilities of severe complication without the need for manual calculation.


2001 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Jeong Nam Heo ◽  
Hyun Chul Rhim ◽  
Yong Soo Kim ◽  
Byung Hee Koh ◽  
On Koo Cho ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 101-104
Author(s):  
Ivan Majdevac ◽  
Nikola Budisin ◽  
Milan Ranisavljevic ◽  
Dejan Lukic ◽  
Imre Lovas ◽  
...  

Background: Hepatectomies are mostly performed for the treatment of hepatic benign or malignant neoplasms, intrahepatic gallstones, or parasitic cysts of the liver. The most common malignant neoplasms of the liver are metastases from colorectal cancer. Anatomic liver resection involves two or more hepatic segments, while non-anatomic liver resection involves resection of the metastases with a margin of uninvolved tissue. The aim of this manuscript was to show results of hepatectomies performed at the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina. Methods: We performed 133 liver resections from January 1997 to December 2013. Clinical and histopathological data were obtained from operative protocols, histopathological reports, and patients? medical histories. Results: We did 80 metastasectomies, 51 segmentectomies, and 18 radiofrequent ablations (RFA). Average number of colorectal cancer metastases was 1.67 per patient. We also made 10 left hepatectomies. In all cases, we made non-anatomic resections. Conclusion: Decision about anatomic versus non-anatomic resections for colorectal metastasis and primary liver tumors should be made before surgical exploration. Preservation of liver parenchyma is important with respect to liver failure and postoperative chemotherapy treatment.


1988 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 629-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Pasquinelli ◽  
F Garreau ◽  
L Bougueleret ◽  
E Cariani ◽  
K H Grzeschik ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wu-zhou Li ◽  
Zhi-wen Liang ◽  
Yi Cao ◽  
Ting-ting Cao ◽  
Hong Quan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Tumor motion may compromise the accuracy of liver stereotactic radiotherapy. In order to carry out a precise planning, estimating liver tumor motion during radiotherapy has received a lot of attention. Previous approach may have difficult to deal with image data corrupted by noise. The iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm is widely used for estimating the rigid registration of three-dimensional point sets when these data were dense or corrupted. In the light of this, our study estimated the three-dimensional (3D) rigid motion of liver tumors during stereotactic liver radiotherapy using reconstructed 3D coordinates of fiducials based on the ICP algorithm. Methods Four hundred ninety-five pairs of orthogonal kilovoltage (KV) images from the CyberKnife stereo imaging system for 12 patients were used in this study. For each pair of images, the 3D coordinates of fiducial markers inside the liver were calculated via geometric derivations. The 3D coordinates were used to calculate the real-time translational and rotational motion of liver tumors around three axes via an ICP algorithm. The residual error was also investigated both with and without rotational correction. Results The translational shifts of liver tumors in left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP),and superior-inferior (SI) directions were 2.92 ± 1.98 mm, 5.54 ± 3.12 mm, and 16.22 ± 5.86 mm, respectively; the rotational angles in left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions were 3.95° ± 3.08°, 4.93° ± 2.90°, and 4.09° ± 1.99°, respectively. Rotational correction decreased 3D fiducial displacement from 1.19 ± 0.35 mm to 0.65 ± 0.24 mm (P<0.001). Conclusions The maximum translational movement occurred in the SI direction. Rotational correction decreased fiducial displacements and increased tumor tracking accuracy.


CLEO: 2014 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Tosi ◽  
E. G. Macchi ◽  
M. Gallati ◽  
G. Braschi ◽  
A. Cigada ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document