scholarly journals Surgical Options and Approaches for Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: When do we operate and what do we do?

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (01) ◽  
pp. 010-015
Author(s):  
Laura Greco ◽  
Jeanette Zhang ◽  
Howard Ross

AbstractLower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common entity encountered by the surgeon. Though most LGIB stops on its own, familiarity with the diagnoses and their treatments is critical to optimal patient care. Even in 2016, surgery may be required. Advances in imaging have led to an enhanced ability to localize bleeding. Newer anticoagulants have developed which provide ease of use to the patient, but challenges to caregivers when bleeding arises.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Machlab ◽  
P Garcia - Iglesias ◽  
E Martinez-Bauer ◽  
E Brunet ◽  
L Hernandez ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-42
Author(s):  
Rubén Diez-Rodríguez ◽  
Rocio Silvana Castillo-Trujillo ◽  
Martha Lucia González-Bárcenas ◽  
Cristina Pisabarros-Blanco ◽  
Ana Barrientos-Castañeda

Author(s):  
Rev George Handzo ◽  
Rev Brian Hughes

Gomez and her colleagues have presented a helpful study of the relationship of the chaplains in her health system to physicians which highlights several barriers to a well-integrated relationship and thus to more optimal patient care. We have seen these same barriers as we have consulted with health systems nationally and have also identified many best practices that mediate or even eliminate many of these barriers. This commentary describes some of what we have seen as chaplain-generated causes of those barriers and effective strategies that have been employed to overcome them. We also provide some resources for chaplains who wish to institute some of these best practices themselves.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Han ◽  
H White ◽  
K Bosch ◽  
M Nair

Abstract Introduction Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) tends to occur in elderly patients with complex comorbidities. At North Middlesex University Hospital (NMUH), LGIB patients are primarily managed by the surgical department. We amended local policies by integrating aspects of new guidelines published by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG). Method Handover documentation between November 2019 and January 2020 established patients admitted with LGIB (n = 45). Further data regarding the management of these patients was collated from clinical software and compared to standards set from BSG guidelines. Results We found NMUH to be efficient in ruling out upper GI bleeds via 24-hour OGDs and had low surgical intervention rates (0.02%). 40% of patients were transfused with an admission haemoglobin above suggested NICE thresholds, accounting for cardiovascular comorbidities. 56% of patients were discharged without a documented anticoagulation plan. Over 50% of patients did not have BSG recommended inpatient investigations. Conclusions Updated Trust guidelines aim to uphold areas that NMUH were shown to excel in, while reiterating NICE transfusion thresholds and include guidance regarding anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications. The Oakland score and shock index have been integrated into local protocols and will aid clinicians in making safe decisions in the management of LGIB patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document