Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of β-Lactams and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: From Theory to Practical Issues in the Intensive Care Unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (04) ◽  
pp. 476-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Williams ◽  
Menino Osbert Cotta ◽  
Jason A. Roberts

AbstractDespite therapeutic advances over recent decades, the mortality rate for sepsis and septic shock is still approximately 25% worldwide. Early administration of appropriate intravenous antibiotics in the right dose is one of the cornerstones of treatment of sepsis. β-Lactam antibiotics are the most commonly prescribed in critically ill patients, and dosages that do not achieve specific pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets may increase the likelihood of treatment failure and even emergence of antibiotic resistance. Fluctuations in physiological parameters are often observed in critically ill patients, leading to altered pharmacokinetics and increased risk of suboptimal exposures, especially if standard dosing according to the product information is prescribed. Contemporary evidence illustrates that therapeutic β-lactam concentrations are inconsistently achieved at steady state. This review will investigate alternative β-lactam dose optimization strategies including prolonged infusions, guideline-based dosing, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), and the use of dose optimization software, all of which aim to increase the likelihood of achieving therapeutic drug concentrations and improve clinical outcomes as compared with the standard dosing approach. These dose optimization strategies have been the subject of a growing body of evidence; however, further investigation into the outcome benefits and validity of both non-TDM and TDM dosing strategies is required. For the clinician, it is important to select a feasible dosing strategy tailored for the individual patient, which will maximize the likelihood of achieving therapeutic concentrations at steady state and maintain these exposures throughout the course of therapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Abdulla ◽  
Puck van den Broek ◽  
Tim M.J. Ewoldt ◽  
Anouk E. Muller ◽  
Henrik Endeman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 166-174
Author(s):  
Nora J mabelis ◽  
Kimberly N. Shudofsky ◽  
Joost J. van Raaij ◽  
Sjoerd D. Meenks ◽  
Thomas Havenith ◽  
...  

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1452
Author(s):  
Schrader Nikolas ◽  
Riese Thorsten ◽  
Kurlbaum Max ◽  
Meybohm Patrick ◽  
Kredel Markus ◽  
...  

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly relevant for an individualized antibiotic therapy and subsequently a necessary tool to reduce multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially in light of diminishing antimicrobial capabilities. Critical illness is associated with profound pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations, which challenge dose finding and the application of particularly hydrophilic drugs such as β-lactam antibiotics. Methods: Implementation strategy, potential benefit, and practicability of the developed standard operating procedures were retrospectively analyzed from January to December 2020. Furthermore, the efficacy of the proposed dosing target of piperacillin in critically ill patients was evaluated. Results: In total, 160 patients received piperacillin/tazobactam therapy and were subsequently included in the study. Of them, 114 patients received piperacillin/tazobactam by continuous infusion and had at least one measurement of piperacillin serum level according to the standard operating procedure. In total, 271 measurements were performed with an average level of 79.0 ± 46.0 mg/L. Seventy-one piperacillin levels exceeded 100 mg/L and six levels were lower than 22.5 mg/L. The high-level and the low-level group differed significantly in infection laboratory parameters (CRP (mg/dL) 20.18 ± 11.71 vs. 5.75 ± 5.33) and renal function [glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.75 m2) 40.85 ± 26.74 vs. 120.50 ± 70.48]. Conclusions: Piperacillin levels are unpredictable in critically ill patients. TDM during piperacillin/tazobactam therapy is highly recommended for all patients. Although our implementation strategy was effective, further strategies implemented into the daily clinical workflow might support the health care staff and increase the clinicians’ alertness.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Neugebauer ◽  
Christina Wichmann ◽  
Sibylle Bremer-Streck ◽  
Stefan Hagel ◽  
Michael Kiehntopf

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 437-437
Author(s):  
Christina Rose ◽  
Michelle Miller ◽  
Kazumi Morita ◽  
Sheriff Gbadamosi ◽  
Kerry Mohrien

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document