scholarly journals New Technologies in Cardiac Critical Care Social Economic Challenges: A Reality Check

Author(s):  
Poonam Malhotra Kapoor
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Checchia ◽  
Katherine L. Brown ◽  
Gil Wernovsky ◽  
Daniel J. Penny ◽  
Ronald A. Bronicki

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (95) ◽  
pp. 51-62
Author(s):  
O.I. Povzun ◽  
N.B. Kozel ◽  
О.А. Karataiev ◽  
G.G. Chetverykov

The article is devoted the analysis of problem of creation of the intelligence systems, which allow to design at logical and vehicle levels economic decisions described mathematical operations above a human language, and which are the elements of multiple-valued of structural organization of informatively-intellectual technologies. A necessity and possibility of development of general theory of construction of intellectual management and intelligence systems is shown, which would become methodological basis of purposeful creation of new technologies of informations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1531-1536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Tabbutt ◽  
Nancy Ghanayem ◽  
Melvin C. Almodovar ◽  
John Charpie ◽  
Stephen J. Roth ◽  
...  

AbstractAs pediatric cardiac critical care becomes more sub-specialized it is reasonable to assume that dedicated units may provide a better infrastructure for improved multidisciplinary care, cardiac-specific patient safety initiatives, and dedicated training of fellows and residents. The knowledge base required to optimally manage pediatric patients with critical cardiac disease has evolved sufficiently to consider a standardized training curriculum and board certification for pediatric cardiac critical care. This strategy would potentially provide consistency of training and healthcare and improve quality of care and patient safety.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 564-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen M. Brown ◽  
Shawna S. Mudd ◽  
Elizabeth A. Hunt ◽  
Julianne S. Perretta ◽  
Nicole A. Shilkofski ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Robin V. Horak ◽  
Shasha Bai ◽  
Bradley S. Marino ◽  
David K. Werho ◽  
Leslie A. Rhodes ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To assess current demographics and duties of physicians as well as the structure of paediatric cardiac critical care in the United States. Design: REDCap surveys were sent by email from May till August 2019 to medical directors (“directors”) of critical care units at the 120 United States centres submitting data to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database and to associated faculty from centres that provided email lists. Faculty and directors were asked about personal attributes and clinical duties. Directors were additionally asked about unit structure. Measurements and main results: Responses were received from 66% (79/120) of directors and 62% (294/477) of contacted faculty. Seventy-six percent of directors and 54% of faculty were male, however, faculty <40 years old were predominantly women. The majority of both groups were white. Median bed count (n = 20) was similar in ICUs and multi-disciplinary paediatric ICUs. The median service expectation for one clinical full-time equivalent was 14 weeks of clinical service (interquartile range 12, 16), with the majority of programmes (86%) providing in-house attending night coverage. Work hours were high during service and non-service weeks with both directors (37%) and faculty (45%). Conclusions: Racial and ethnic diversity is markedly deficient in the paediatric cardiac critical care workforce. Although the majority of faculty are male, females make up the majority of the workforce younger than 40 years old. Work hours across all age groups and unit types are high both on- and off-service, with most units providing attending in-house night coverage.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jennifer Schuette ◽  
Hayden Zaccagni ◽  
Janet Donohue ◽  
Julie Bushnell ◽  
Kelly Veneziale ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium (PC4) is a multi-institutional quality improvement registry focused on the care delivered in the cardiac ICU for patients with CHD and acquired heart disease. To assess data quality, a rigorous procedure of data auditing has been in place since the inception of the consortium. Materials and methods: This report describes the data auditing process and quantifies the audit results for the initial 39 audits that took place after the transition from version one to version two of the registry’s database. Results: In total, 2219 total encounters were audited for an average of 57 encounters per site. The overall data accuracy rate across all sites was 99.4%, with a major discrepancy rate of 0.52%. A passing score is based on an overall accuracy of >97% (achieved by all sites) and a major discrepancy rate of <1.5% (achieved by 38 of 39 sites, with 35 of 39 sites having a major discrepancy rate of <1%). Fields with the highest discrepancy rates included arrhythmia type, cardiac arrest count, and current surgical status. Conclusions: The extensive PC4 auditing process, including initial and routinely scheduled follow-up audits of every participating site, demonstrates an extremely high level of accuracy across a broad array of audited fields and supports the continued use of consortium data to identify best practices in paediatric cardiac critical care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document