Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks of the Posterior Fossa: Patient Characteristics and Imaging Features

Author(s):  
Kristen L. Yancey ◽  
Nauman F. Manzoor ◽  
Robert J. Yawn ◽  
Matthew O'Malley ◽  
Alejandro Rivas ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The main purpose of this article is to investigate the prevalence and features of posterior fossa defects (PFD) in spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks (sCSFL). Design Retrospective case series. Setting Tertiary skull base center. Participants Consecutive adults undergoing lateral skull base repair of sCSFL between 2003 and 2018. Main Outcome Measures The following data were collected: demographics, comorbidities, radiology and intraoperative findings, and surgical outcomes including complications and need for revision surgery or shunt placement. Patients with incomplete data or leaks following skull base surgery, trauma, or chronic ear disease were excluded. Results Seventy-one patients (74% female, mean age 56.39 ± 11.50 years) underwent repair of spontaneous lateral skull base leaks. Eight ears (7 patients, 11.1%) had leaks involving the posterior fossa plate in addition to defects of the tegmen mastoideum (50%), tegmen tympani (25%), or both (25%). Patients with PFDs more often had bilateral tegmen thinning on imaging (75%, odds ratio [OR]: 10.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.20–54.35, p = 0.005) and symptomatic bilateral leaks (OR: 9.67, 95% CI: 2.22–40.17, p = 0.01. All PFD patients had arachnoid granulations adjacent to ipsilateral mastoid cell opacification. However, this finding was often subtle and rarely included on the radiology report. There was no significant difference in body mass index, age, presenting complaints, or operative success between the PFD and isolated tegmen defect sCSFL cohorts. Conclusions The posterior fossa is an uncommon location for sCSFL. Careful review of preoperative imaging is often suggestive and can inform surgical approach. PFD patients are similar to those with isolated tegmen-based defects in presentation, comorbidities, and outcomes.

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. e831-e836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan L. Hatch ◽  
Heather Schopper ◽  
Isabel M. Boersma ◽  
Habib G. Rizk ◽  
Shaun A. Nguyen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. 1138-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan P. O’Connell ◽  
Shawn M. Stevens ◽  
Christopher C. Xiao ◽  
Ted A. Meyer ◽  
Rodney J. Schlosser

2013 ◽  
Vol 74 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gurston Nyquist ◽  
Marc Rosen ◽  
Mark Friedel ◽  
Gregory Artz ◽  
Thomas Willcox ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 1522-1524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle P. Allen ◽  
Brandon Isaacson ◽  
Patricia Purcell ◽  
Joe Walter Kutz ◽  
Peter S. Roland

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nofrat Schwartz ◽  
Deanna Sasaki-Adams ◽  
Kevin D. Brown ◽  
Adam M. Zanation ◽  
Brian D. Thorp ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 128 (10) ◽  
pp. 894-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Kristin ◽  
Manuel Burggraf ◽  
Dirk Mucha ◽  
Christoph Malolepszy ◽  
Silvan Anderssohn ◽  
...  

Objective: Navigation systems create a connection between imaging data and intraoperative situs, allowing the surgeon to consistently determine the location of instruments and patient anatomy during the surgical procedure. The best results regarding the target registration error (measurement uncertainty) are normally demonstrated using fiducials. This study aimed at investigating a new registration strategy for an electromagnetic navigation device. Methods: For evaluation of an electromagnetic navigation system and comparison of registration with screw markers and automatic registration, we are calculating the target registration error in the region of the paranasal sinuses/anterior and lateral skull base with the use of an electromagnetic navigation system and intraoperative digital volume tomography (cone-beam computed tomography). We carried out 10 registrations on a head model (total n = 150 measurements) and 10 registrations on 4 temporal bone specimens (total n = 160 measurements). Results: All in all, the automatic registration was easy to perform. For the models that were used, a significant difference between an automatic registration and the registration on fiducials was evident for just a limited number of screws. Furthermore, the observed differences varied in terms of the preferential registration procedure. Conclusion: The automatic registration strategy seems to be an alternative to the established methods in artificial and cadaver models of intraoperative scenarios. Using intraoperative imaging, there is an option to resort to this kind of registration as needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document