A Comprehensive Treatment Approach to Address Speech Production and Literacy Skills in School-Age Children with Speech Sound Disorders

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (02) ◽  
pp. 136-146
Author(s):  
Chenell Loudermill ◽  
Tamar Greenwell ◽  
Françoise Brosseau-Lapré
Keyword(s):  
Service Delivery ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Speech Sound ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
Comprehensive Treatment ◽  
School Age ◽  
Speech Sound Disorders ◽  
School Based ◽  
Production Accuracy

AbstractChildren with speech sound disorders (SSDs) represent a large proportion of clients served by school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs). While considerable evidence is available regarding the identification of SSD in school-age children, there is a paucity of information regarding service delivery aspects of school-based speech therapy, such as frequency of sessions, number of trials, distribution of sessions over time, and format (individual or group intervention) that impacts the ability of SLPs to effectively treat SSD in the schools. School-age children with SSD are at risk for later literacy deficits, and strategically addressing their language and emerging literacy needs in addition to speech production accuracy may lead to increased intelligibility and better educational outcomes. In this article, we discuss the heterogeneity of school-age children with SSD with regard to weaknesses in phonological processing skills and language skills. We summarize the information currently available regarding the aspects of service delivery that contribute to gains in speech production accuracy. We conclude by sharing an example of how school-based SLPs could target speech production, phonological awareness, and morphological awareness in the same session with a child with SSD to maximize gains in speech and literacy skills.

scholarly journals A Pilot Investigation of Speech Sound Disorder Intervention Delivered by Telehealth to School-Age Children

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Grogan-Johnson ◽  
Rodney M. Gabel ◽  
Jacquelyn Taylor ◽  
Lynne E. Rowan ◽  
Robin Alvares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Service Delivery ◽  
Sound Production ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
School Setting ◽  
Speech Sound ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Speech Sound Disorders ◽  
Speech Sound Disorder ◽  
Post Intervention

This article describes a school-based telehealth service delivery model and reports outcomes made by school-age students with speech sound disorders in a rural Ohio school district. Speech therapy using computer-based speech sound intervention materials was provided either by live interactive videoconferencing (telehealth), or conventional side-by-side intervention.  Progress was measured using pre- and post-intervention scores on the Goldman Fristoe Test of Articulation-2 (Goldman & Fristoe, 2002). Students in both service delivery models made significant improvements in speech sound production, with students in the telehealth condition demonstrating greater mastery of their Individual Education Plan (IEP) goals. Live interactive videoconferencing thus appears to be a viable method for delivering intervention for speech sound disorders to children in a rural, public school setting. Keywords:  Telehealth, telerehabilitation, videoconferencing, speech sound disorder, speech therapy, speech-language pathology; E-Helper

A Comparison of Intervention Intensity and Service Delivery Models With School-Age Children With Speech Sound Disorders in a School Setting

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Beth A. Byers ◽  
Monica L. Bellon-Harn ◽  
Madeline Allen ◽  
Karen Whisenhunt Saar ◽  
Vinaya Manchaiah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Service Delivery ◽  
Speech Sound ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Treatment Intensity ◽  
School Age ◽  
Service Delivery Model ◽  
Speech Sound Disorders ◽  
Delivery Model ◽  
Intervention Intensity

Purpose This study examined intervention intensity and service delivery with school-age children with mild or mild–moderate speech sound disorders. The commonly used business-as-usual (BAU) service delivery model and a shorter, more frequent, individual model (experimental [EXP]) were compared. Method A between-subjects group design was selected. In BAU, 11 children received group sessions, 2 times per week, 30 min per session for 6 weeks. In EXP, 11 children received individual session, 3 times per week, 5 min per session for 6 weeks. Group differences on measures of dose (i.e., therapeutic input and production trials) and cumulative treatment intensity were examined. The extent to which children, across both conditions, demonstrated gains in speech sound accuracy and the extent to which gains differed between BAU and EXP were examined. Results There was a significant group difference on dose. Children in BAU received more therapeutic input and production trials than children in EXP. Cumulative treatment intensity was not statistically different between groups when dose was calculated as therapeutic input or production trials. Results from both conditions indicated statistically significant differences on measures of speech sound accuracy with large effect sizes. No group differences on gains were noted. Conclusions Dose calculated as therapeutic input and production trials plays an important role in understanding the impact of cumulative intervention intensity. Children with mild or mild–moderate speech sound disorders may benefit more from a shorter, frequent, individual service delivery model than a BAU model.

Systems-Based Approaches to Speech-Language Pathology Service Delivery for School Age Children

2020 ◽  
pp. 113-136
Author(s):  
RaMonda Horton
Keyword(s):  
Service Delivery ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
School Based ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Culture Environment ◽  
Culture And Development ◽  
The Relationship

This chapter will provide readers with an overview of how a systems-based approach can be used to understand the relationship between culture, environment, language, and disability. It will identify a useful model of ecology, culture, and development that can and should be considered in conjunction with the WHO-ICF framework to guide service delivery in school-based settings. This chapter will also provide an overview of systems-based approaches that can be used when working with children from traditionally marginalized backgrounds. Finally, a case study example will be used to provide guidance on the application of systems-based approaches to service delivery for children in school-based settings.

scholarly journals Differences Between School-Age Children With Apraxia of Speech and Other Speech Sound Disorders on Multisyllable Repetition

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 794-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina R. Benway ◽  
Jonathan L. Preston
Keyword(s):  
Speech Sound ◽  
Previous Literature ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Apraxia Of Speech ◽  
Speech Sound Disorders ◽  
Childhood Apraxia Of Speech ◽  
Speech Corpus ◽  
Word Structure ◽  
Speech Features

Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate whether features of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) identified in previous literature could be replicated in a sample of school-age children. Method A literature review was conducted to identify candidate speech features that have been previously considered when differentiating CAS from other types of speech sound disorders (SSDs). The candidate features recoverable from blinded transcriptions of multisyllable word repetitions (MSWRs) were applied to a cohort of 61 children aged 7–17 years, previously classified as having CAS ( n = 21) or non-CAS SSD ( n = 40). Results One hundred and ninety-four features had been explored in previous literature to assess their ability to differentiate CAS from other SSDs. Fifteen perceptual features were selected from this list to be applied to performance on the MSWR. In this sample, children with CAS differed from children with SSD on the prevalence of voicing changes, percentage of structurally correct words, correct lexical stress, and syllable deletions within a speech corpus derived from the MSWR task. Conclusion Although previous literature points to numerous features as differentiating CAS from other SSDs, only a portion of those features were replicated in this sample of school-age children. Features of CAS that affect segmental accuracy, prosody, and word structure may be likely to persist into late childhood and early adolescence.

scholarly journals Tutorial: Speech Motor Chaining Treatment for School-Age Children With Speech Sound Disorders

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan L. Preston ◽  
Megan C. Leece ◽  
Jaclyn Storto
Keyword(s):  
Motor Learning ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Speech Sound ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
School Age ◽  
Speech Sound Disorders ◽  
Feedback Type ◽  
Practice Variability ◽  
Speech Motor

Purpose Operationalized treatments for school-age children with speech sound disorders may result in more replicable and evidence-based interventions. This tutorial describes Speech Motor Chaining (SMC) procedures, which are designed to build complex speech around core movements by incorporating several principles of motor learning. The procedures systematically manipulate factors such as feedback type and frequency, practice variability, and stimulus complexity based on the child's performance. Method The rationale and procedures for SMC are described. Examples are presented of how to design stimuli, deliver feedback, and adapt the approach. Free resources are provided to guide clinicians through implementation of the procedure. Data on fidelity of implementation and dose per session are presented. Clinical and research evidence is provided to illustrate likely outcomes with the procedure. Results SMC is a method that can result in successful acquisition of target speech patterns and generalization to untrained words. Most clinicians can implement the procedure with over 90% fidelity, and most children can achieve over 200 trials per session. Conclusion Clinicians and researchers can use or adapt the operationally defined SMC procedures to incorporate several principles of motor learning into treatment for school-age children with speech sound disorders. Supplemental Material https://osf.io/5jmf9/

Service Delivery Schedule Effects on Speech Sound Production Outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
David M. Rehfeld ◽  
Tracey N. Sulak
Keyword(s):  
Service Delivery ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Speech Sound ◽  
Individualized Education Program ◽  
Speech Sound Disorders ◽  
Individualized Education ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
School Based ◽  
Therapy Services

Purpose Children with speech sound disorders feature prominently on the caseloads of speech-language pathologists working in schools, with many receiving services once or twice weekly for 20–30 min. This study compared the outcomes of services provided twice weekly for 30 min to those provided 4 times weekly for 15 min to examine their effectiveness in remediating speech sound disorders in an elementary school setting. Method A total of 35 students were recruited from an existing public school caseload for participation. Participants were randomly assigned to receive school-based speech therapy services for either 30 min twice weekly or 15 min 4 times weekly. There were no differences between groups in age, gender, or the amount of time spent in general education. Growth was measured by the percentage of Individualized Education Program goals mastered and the percentage of sounds produced correctly in isolation. Results After one calendar year, there was a negligible difference between groups on both the percentage of Individualized Education Program goals mastered and the percentage of sounds produced correctly in isolation. On average, both scheduling configurations were effective in meeting students' needs. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that children with speech sound disorders receiving school-based speech therapy services can benefit from a variety of scheduling options. Awareness of such options is an invaluable resource to speech-language pathologists wanting to provide effective and efficient services. Future research should continue investigating service delivery models' effects in applied settings.

IEP goals for school-age children with speech sound disorders

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 184-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Farquharson ◽  
Sherine R. Tambyraja ◽  
Laura M. Justice ◽  
Erin E. Redle
Keyword(s):  
Speech Sound ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Speech Sound Disorders

Assessing Speech Sound Disorders in School-Age Children From Diverse Language Backgrounds: A Tutorial With Three Case Studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 714-725
Author(s):  
Javier Jasso ◽  
Jill R. Potratz
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Speech Sound ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
School Age ◽  
Speech Sound Disorders ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists

Purpose Assessing speech sound disorders (SSDs) in children from multilingual backgrounds requires synthesis of language- and dialect-specific information to arrive at a more accurate diagnosis. We present three case studies of school-age children with unique linguistic profiles to aid speech-language pathologists in assessing this diverse population. Our aim is to offer feasible strategies for speech-language pathologists who do not speak the student's language(s). Method Three multilingual school-age children with suspected SSD were assessed as part of an initial evaluation at a suburban school district. Children spoke Vietnamese–English, Japanese–Polish–English, and Tamil–English. Students' languages were considered in the entire assessment process (i.e., interview, test selection, data analysis, and clinical decision making), and appropriate measures and resources were chosen to understand word-level and spontaneous articulation, phonological awareness, and language skills. A contrastive analysis was used to determine the presence of an SSD. Conclusions Although all students presented with patterns attributable to transfer processes (e.g., nonmainstream vowel productions) and/or dialectal differences, only one of the three students presented with an SSD. Together, these cases underscore the importance of a comprehensive assessment for multilingual children.

Innovative Service Delivery Models for Serving Children with Speech Sound Disorders

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (02) ◽  
pp. 113-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Greenwell ◽  
Françoise Brosseau-Lapré
Keyword(s):  
Service Delivery ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Speech Sound ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
Speech Sound Disorders ◽  
Speech Sound Disorder ◽  
Clinical Supervisors ◽  
Service Delivery Models ◽  
Delivery Models

AbstractService delivery variables that may have an impact on the treatment outcomes of children with speech sound disorders include the number and duration of intervention sessions, distribution of the sessions over time, and the format (group intervention or individual intervention). In this article, we briefly review these variables and the recommendations for the most effective service delivery components for children with speech sound disorders. We then describe innovative, collaborative service delivery models for preschoolers and school-age children with speech sound disorder. The models include “Quick Articulation!” conducted in a local elementary school by clinical MS-SLP students from Purdue University, as well as Summer Speech and Literacy Laboratory, which takes place in the department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences at Purdue and involves participation from clinical and research faculty, and graduate and undergraduate students. The article provides useful information to help guide clinicians and clinical supervisors in implementing components of these models into their practice with children with speech sound disorder.

Dimensions of Multiskilling

1999 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole E. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Service Delivery ◽  
Monitoring Program ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Support Personnel ◽  
Educational Personnel ◽  
Educational Audiology ◽  
Children With Hearing Loss ◽  
Improve Service Delivery

Educational audiologists often must delegate certain tasks to other educational personnel who function as support personnel and need training in order to perform assigned tasks. Support personnel are people who, after appropriate training, perform tasks that are prescribed, directed, and supervised by a professional such as a certified and licensed audiologist. The training of support personnel to perform tasks that are typically performed by those in other disciplines is calledmultiskilling. This article discusses multiskilling and the use of support personnel in educational audiology in reference to the following principles: guidelines, models of multiskilling, components of successful multiskilling, and "dos and don’ts" for multiskilling. These principles are illustrated through the use of multiskilling in the establishment of a hearing aid monitoring program. Successful multiskilling and the use of support personnel by educational audiologists can improve service delivery to school-age children with hearing loss.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document