Robotic Surgery for Complicated Diverticular Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (05) ◽  
pp. 297-301
Author(s):  
Fadwa Ali ◽  
Elizabeth Raskin
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Diverticular Disease ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Economic Burden ◽  
Complicated Diverticulitis ◽  
Robotic Colorectal Surgery

AbstractDiverticular disease is common, and increasing in prevalence worldwide. The treatment for acute and chronic diverticular disease has a huge clinical and economic burden. Surgery is standard for complicated diverticulitis, and there are several benefits to using robotic surgery in these cases. Complicated diverticular disease can result in fistula, fibrosis, and deranged anatomy, which present technical challenges to the surgeon. Understanding and anticipating these anatomical challenges is key to successful surgery. While fears of conversion in complicated cases may stop surgeons from using traditional laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery is especially promising for enhancing dexterity, visualization, and facilitating completely minimally invasive surgery in these complicated cases. In this chapter, we review end-to-end technical strategies of robotic colorectal surgery for complicated diverticular disease, including cases with colovesicular, colovaginal, and colocutaneous fistulae.

Robotic colorectal surgery: Where are we right now?

2010 ◽  
Vol 224 (7) ◽  
pp. 1415-1419 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Kang ◽  
K Y Lee
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Colorectal Disease ◽  
Widespread Application ◽  
Robotic Colorectal Surgery

Minimally invasive surgery has become mainstream in surgical management of colorectal disease. Based on evidence of oncologic safety and benefit to patients, laparoscopic colorectal surgery is regarded as a successful alternative to open surgery. Since the introduction of the da Vinci® system as another tool for minimally invasive surgery, there have been several reports regarding the feasibility and safety of the system. The authors looked at their experience with 412 robotic colorectal surgeries and found that it was feasible and safe. Incidence of operation-related morbidity was around 11 per cent and system-related problems were 2.4 per cent. There was no operation-related or system-related mortality. From a technological perspective, robotic surgery has several advantages over laparoscopic surgery, including a magnifying view with a three-dimensional image, a stable camera platform, and instruments with Endowrist® technology that allow for seven degrees of freedom of movement. However, there is still room for improvement. The revolution of robotic technology can aid in the realization of a dream: a smaller, cheaper, and more sophisticated robotic system, which will further facilitate the widespread application of robotic surgery to colorectal disease.

scholarly journals Clinical effect of minimally invasive surgery for inguinal cryptorchidism

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunjin Wang ◽  
Liu Chen ◽  
Xu Cui ◽  
Chaoming Zhou ◽  
Qing Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Clinical Effect ◽  
Testicular Atrophy ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Good Cosmetic ◽  
Scrotal Hematoma

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of minimally invasive surgery for inguinal cryptorchidism. Methods The patients were divided into the minimally invasive surgery group (n = 100) and the traditional surgery group (n = 58). In the minimally invasive surgery group, patients with low inguinal cryptorchidism (n = 54) underwent surgery with a transscrotal incision, and patients with high inguinal cryptorchidism (n = 46) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Results There was no difference in the hospital stay duration or cost between the minimally invasive surgery group and the traditional surgery group (P > 0.05). As for the operative time, minimally invasive surgery of low inguinal cryptorchidism was shorter than traditional surgery (P = 0.033), while minimally invasive surgery of high inguinal cryptorchidism was comparable to traditional surgery (P = 0.658). Additionally, there were no cases of testicular atrophy, testicular retraction, inguinal hernia or hydrocele in either group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of poor wound healing between the two groups (P > 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of scrotal hematoma between the two groups (P > 0.05), the incidence in the minimally invasive surgery group was higher than that in the traditional surgery group. Conclusions Minimally invasive surgery including a transscrotal incision for low inguinal cryptorchidism and laparoscopic surgery for high inguinal cryptorchidism is as safe and effective as traditional surgery, and could also provide a good cosmetic effect for children.

Ergonomics of minimally invasive surgery: an analysis of muscle effort and fatigue in the operating room between laparoscopic and robotic surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 2323-2331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscila R. Armijo ◽  
Chun-Kai Huang ◽  
Robin High ◽  
Melissa Leon ◽  
Ka-Chun Siu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Invasive Surgery

scholarly journals Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1121-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley B. Conrad ◽  
Pedro T. Ramirez ◽  
William Burke ◽  
R. Wendel Naumann ◽  
Kari L. Ring ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Single Port Laparoscopy

ObjectivesTo evaluate the current patterns of use of minimally invasive surgical procedures, including traditional, robotic-assisted, and single-port laparoscopy, by Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) members and to compare the results to those of our 2004 and 2007 surveys.MethodsThe Society of Gynecologic Oncology members were surveyed through an online or mailed-paper survey. Data were analyzed and compared with results of our prior surveys.ResultsFour hundred six (32%) of 1279 SGO members responded. Eighty-three percent of respondents (n = 337) performed traditional laparoscopic surgery (compared with 84% in 2004 and 91% in 2007). Ninety-seven percent of respondents performed robotic surgery (compared with 27% in 2007). When respondents were asked to indicate procedures that they performed with the robot but not with traditional laparoscopy, 75% indicated radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Overall, 70% of respondents indicated that hysterectomy and staging for uterine cancer was the procedure they most commonly performed with a minimally invasive approach. Only 17% of respondents who performed minimally invasive surgery performed single-port laparoscopy, and only 5% of respondents indicated that single-port laparoscopy has an important or very important role in the field.ConclusionsSince our prior surveys, we found a significant increase in the overall use and indications for robotic surgery. Radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer and total hysterectomy and staging for endometrial cancer were procedures found to be significantly more appropriate for the robotic platform in comparison to traditional laparoscopy. The indications for laparoscopy have expanded beyond endometrial cancer staging to include surgical management of early-stage cervical and ovarian cancers, but the use of single-port laparoscopy remains limited.

scholarly journals Minimally invasive surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. The approach to laparoscopic surgery in endometriosis and oncology

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (68) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Cătălin Bogdan Coroleucă ◽  
Manu Andrei ◽  
Alexandra Bauşic ◽  
Ana-Maria Rădulescu ◽  
Ciprian Andrei  Coroleucă ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery

Robots in Medicine

2019 ◽  
pp. 1543-1566
Author(s):  
Hruday Kasina ◽  
M. V. A. Raju Bahubalendruni ◽  
Rahul Botcha
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Medical Industry ◽  
Industrial Applications ◽  
Medical Applications ◽  
Operation Theatre ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Robotic Surgeries

Robots are wide across used in several industrial applications. Robot applications are more found in medical industry in recent days. In initial days, robots were mostly used for simple surgeries and medical applications such as laparoscopic surgery and minimally invasive surgery in 1980's. At that time robotic surgeries were performed with the presence of surgeons in operation theatre. The present day technology has been so much advanced with more enhanced capabilities to perform several complicated tasks such as remote surgery and micro robotic surgery. The current paper discuss about the history and evolution of robots in medical industry and their latest technological advances, applications in various fields in medicine and limitations of robots in medical industry along with its future scope.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document