Utility of ERAS Pathway in Nonabdominal-Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: Efficacy in PAP Flap Reconstruction?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Jeong Cho ◽  
Ricardo Garza ◽  
Sumeet S. Teotia ◽  
Nicholas T. Haddock
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Eras Protocol

Abstract Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are effective in decreasing hospital length of stay and inpatient opioid consumption. Implementation of these protocols in abdominally based breast reconstruction has been successful. When a patient is a poor candidate for abdominally based flaps a popular secondary option is the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap. We present our experience with implementation of our ERAS protocol in patients treated with PAP flaps for breast reconstruction. Methods Retrospective review of patients treated with autologous breast reconstruction using PAP flaps before and after ERAS implementation were performed. Patient characteristics, postoperative oral morphine equivalents (OMEs), and flap data were collected. Results A total of 87 patients were included in this study (58 patients in pre-ERAS and 29 patients in ERAS group). There was no statistical difference in patient age, comorbidities, smoking, and radiation between two groups. The ERAS group had statistically lower hospital length of stay (2.6 vs. 3.8 days), procedure time (315 vs. 433 minutes), postoperative day 0 (54.8 vs. 96.3), postoperative day 1 (29.9 vs. 57.7), and total opioid consumption (103.7 vs. 192.1). There was no statistical difference in average pain scores between two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that procedure time significantly increased the amount of opioid consumption while ERAS implementation significantly reduced LOS and opioid consumption. Conclusion Use of an ERAS protocol in PAP flap breast reconstruction has not been previously studied. Our work shows that ERAS implementation in PAP flap breast reconstruction significantly reduces inpatient opioid use and length of hospital stay.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Cesarean Delivery Decreases Length of Hospital Stay and Opioid Consumption: A Quality Improvement Initiative

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia K. Shinnick ◽  
Merima Ruhotina ◽  
Phinnara Has ◽  
Bridget J. Kelly ◽  
E. Christine Brousseau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Cesarean Deliveries ◽  
Eras Protocol

Objective The aim of this study is to assess the effect of a resident-led enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for scheduled prelabor cesarean deliveries on hospital length of stay and postpartum opioid consumption. Study Design This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent scheduled prelabor cesarean deliveries before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol at a single academic tertiary care institution. The primary outcome was length of stay following cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included protocol adherence, inpatient opioid consumption, and patient-centered outcomes. The protocol included multimodal analgesia and antiemetic medications, expedited urinary catheter removal, early discontinuation of maintenance intravenous fluids, and early ambulation. Results A total of 250 patients were included in the study: 122 in the pre-ERAS cohort and 128 in the post-ERAS cohort. There were no differences in baseline demographics, medical comorbidities, or cesarean delivery characteristics between the two groups. Following protocol implementation, hospital length of stay decreased by an average of 7.9 hours (pre-ERAS 82.1 vs. post-ERAS 74.2, p < 0.001). There was 89.8% adherence to the entire protocol as written. Opioid consumption decreased by an average of 36.5 mg of oxycodone per patient, with no significant differences in pain scores from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 4 (all p > 0.05). Conclusion A resident-driven quality improvement project was associated with decreased length of hospital stay, decreased opioid consumption, and unchanged visual analog pain scores at the time of hospital discharge. Implementation of this ERAS protocol is feasible and effective. Key Points

scholarly journals Implementation of an ERAS Pathway in Colorectal Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (02) ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliana Bordeianou ◽  
Paul Cavallaro
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Postoperative Care ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Standardized Protocol ◽  
Improve Hospital ◽  
Eras Protocol

AbstractEnhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been demonstrated to improve hospital length of stay and outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. This article presents the specific components of an ERAS protocol implemented at the authors' institution. In particular, details of both surgical and anesthetic ERAS pathways are provided with explanation of all aspects of preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative care. Evidence supporting inclusion of various aspects within the ERAS protocol is briefly reviewed. The ERAS protocol described has significantly benefitted postoperative outcomes in colorectal patients and can be employed at other institutions wishing to develop an ERAS pathway for colorectal patients. A checklist is provided for clinicians to easily reference and facilitate implementation of a standardized protocol.

Implementation of a patient-specific tapering protocol at discharge decreases total opioid dose prescribed for 6 weeks after elective primary spine surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 474-478
Author(s):  
Sarah S Joo ◽  
Oluwatobi O Hunter ◽  
Mallika Tamboli ◽  
Jody C Leng ◽  
T Kyle Harrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Opioid Dose ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Primary Spine

Background and objectivesAt our institution, we developed an individualized discharge opioid prescribing and tapering protocol for joint replacement patients and implemented the same protocol for neurosurgical spine patients. We then tested the hypothesis that this protocol will decrease the oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME) dose of opioid prescribed postdischarge after elective primary spine surgery.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we identified all consecutive elective primary spine surgery cases 1 year before and after introduction of the protocol. This protocol used the patient’s prior 24-hour inpatient opioid consumption to determine discharge opioid pill count and tapering schedule. The primary outcome was total opioid dose prescribed in oral MME from discharge through 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital opioid consumption in MME, hospital length of stay, MME prescribed at discharge, opioid refills, and rates of minor and major adverse events.ResultsEighty-three cases comprised the final sample (45 preintervention and 38 postintervention). There were no differences in baseline characteristics. The total oral MME (median (IQR)) from discharge through 6 weeks postoperatively was 900 (420–1440) preintervention compared with 300 (112–806) postintervention (p<0.01, Mann-Whitney U test), and opioid refill rates were not different between groups. There were no differences in other outcomes.ConclusionsThis patient-specific prescribing and tapering protocol effectively decreases the total opioid dose prescribed for 6 weeks postdischarge after elective primary spine surgery. Our experience also demonstrates the potential generalizability of this protocol, which was originally designed for joint replacement patients, to other surgical populations.

Reducing Length of Stay after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction with a Standardized Postoperative Protocol

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (08) ◽  
pp. 557-567
Author(s):  
Matthew A. DelMauro ◽  
Kevin Chen ◽  
Alex Keller
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Postoperative Care ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Senior Author ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Flap Failure

Abstract Background Despite widespread acceptance of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in other surgical specialties, plastic surgery has been slow to adopt fast-track principles. Recently, however, studies have shown that patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction may benefit from a comprehensive postoperative protocol. Methods All microsurgical breast reconstructions with abdominal free flaps performed by the senior author (A.K.) at a single institution from June 2009 to December 2013 were reviewed. Demographic information (e.g., age, body mass index, and comorbidities), operative details (e.g., laterality, type of flap), and postoperative data (e.g., complications, length of stay) were collected from patients' medical records. The authors employed a universal comprehensive protocol that dictated all postoperative care as it relates to diet, ambulation, flap monitoring, anticoagulation, analgesia, venous thromboembolism, antibiotic prophylaxis, and discharge criteria. Results During the study period, 161 patients underwent 289 free flaps. The average length of stay for all patients was 3.26 ± 1.19 days. The incidence of complications requiring return to the operating room was 4.35% (7 patients). The incidence of flap failure was 0.69% (2 of 289 flaps). Only one flap failure occurred after hospital discharge. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the presence of any complication requiring return to the operating room increased hospital course by an average of 1.37 days (p = 0.0027). Conclusion The standardization of postoperative care for patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction results in a short hospital length of stay without increasing the incidence of flap failure or postoperative complications requiring return to the operating room.

Do Patient Expectations of Discharge Affect Length of Stay after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravinder Bamba ◽  
Jordan E. Wiebe ◽  
Christopher A. Ingersol ◽  
Steven Dawson ◽  
Mithun Sinha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Patient Expectations ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Eras Protocol

Abstract Introduction Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is a common method of breast reconstruction. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) postoperative protocols have been used to optimize patient outcomes and facilitate shorter hospital stays. The effect of patient expectations on length of stay (LOS) after DIEP has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether patient expectations affect LOS. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed for patients undergoing DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction from 2017 to 2020. All patients were managed with the same ERAS protocol. Patients were divided in Group I (early expectations) and Group II (standard expectations). Group I patients had expectations set for discharge postoperative day (POD) 2 for unilateral DIEP and POD 3 for bilateral DIEP. Group II patients were given expectations for POD 3 to 4 for unilateral DIEP and POD 4 to 5 for bilateral. The primary outcome variable was LOS. Results The study included 215 DIEP flaps (45 unilateral and 85 bilateral). The average age was 49.8 years old, and the average body mass index (BMI) was 31.4. Group I (early expectations) included 56 patients (24 unilateral DIEPs, 32 bilateral). Group II (standard expectations) had 74 patients (21 unilateral, 53 bilateral). LOS for unilateral DIEP was 2.9 days for Group I compared with 3.7 days for Group II (p = 0.004). Group I bilateral DIEP patients had LOS of 3.5 days compared with 3.9 days for Group II (p = 0.02). Immediate timing of DIEP (Group I 42.9 vs. Group II 52.7%) and BMI (Group I 32.1 vs. Group II 30.8) were similar (p = 0.25). Conclusion Our study found significantly shorter hospital stay after DIEP flap for patients who expected an earlier discharge date despite similar patient characteristics and uniform ERAS protocol. Patient expectations should be considered during patient counseling and as a confounding variable when analyzing ERAS protocols.

The Impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program on Patients Treated for Gynecologic Cancer in the Community Hospital Setting

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 581-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto A. Mendivil ◽  
Justin R. Busch ◽  
David C. Richards ◽  
Heather Vittori ◽  
Bram H. Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
The Impact

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of gynecologic oncology patients treated in the community hospital setting either under the auspices of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol or in accordance with physician discretion.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated a series of consecutive gynecologic oncology patients who were managed via open surgery in coincident with an ERAS pathway from January 2015 to December 2016. They were compared with a historical open surgery cohort who was treated from November 2013 to December 2014. The primary clinical end points encompassed hospital length of stay, hospital costs, and patient readmission rates.ResultsThere were 86 subjects accrued in the ERAS group and 91 patients in the historical cohort. The implementation of ERAS occasioned a greater than 3-day mean reduction in hospital stay (8.04 days for the historical group vs 4.88 days for the ERAS subjects; P = 0.001) and correspondingly diminished hospital costs ($11,877.47/patient vs $9305.26/patient; P = 0.04). Moreover, there were 2 readmissions (2.3%) in the ERAS group compared with 4 (4.4%) in the historical cohort (P = 0.282).ConclusionsThe results from our investigation suggest that adhering to an ERAS protocol confers beneficial hospital length of stay and hospital cost outcomes, without compromising patient readmission rates. Additional investigation scrutinizing the impact of ERAS enactment with more defined study variables in a larger, randomized setting is warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document