Role of Slovenian Medical Chamber Ethics Committe in Education of Gastrointestinal Endoscopists in Slovenia to Solve Ethical Problems in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Endoscopy ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Dajčman
2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 152-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Cappellanes ◽  
Kiyoshi Hashiba ◽  
Horus A. Brasil ◽  
Marco A. D’Assunção ◽  
Daniel Moribe ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erich H. Loewy

Virtue ethics attempts to identify certain commonly agreed-upon dispositions to act in certain ways, dispositions that would be accepted as ‘good’ by those affected, and to locate the goodness or badness of an act internal to the agent. Basically, virtue ethics is said to date back to Aristotle, but as Alisdair MacIntyre has pointed out, the whole idea of ‘virtue ethics’ would have been unintelligible in Greek philosophy for “a virtue (arete) was an excellence and ethics concerned excellence of character; all ethics was virtue ethics.” Virtue ethics as a method to approach problems in medical ethics is said by some to lend itself to working through cases at the bedside or, at least, is better than the conventional method of handling ethical problems. In this paper I want to explore some of the shortcomings of this approach, examine other traditional approaches, indicate some of their limitations, and suggest a different conceptualization of the approach.


2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-157
Author(s):  
Caleb Gordon ◽  
Hannah Malcolm

This article analyses the growing participation of UK Christians in climate initiatives over the last five years. In many cases, climate science is cited as a necessary consideration for the fulfilment of already-existing Christian commitments. This represents a significant shift in the ways UK Christians understand the role of dialogue between theology and the sciences; previous science and theology dialogue has usually been treated as an area of expert concern, primarily offering insight into apologetics or specific ethical problems. By contrast, the dialogue between climate science and theology has seen the emergence of non-technical leadership amid the expectation that climate science plays a critical role in re-examining the meaning of Christian life, both for individuals and as communities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 224-236
Author(s):  
Maria E. Ruth ◽  

These notes were inspired by a recent article by Boris Norman and Natalja Rajnochová on the role of patronymics in the Russian naming tradition and culture (Voprosy onomastiki, 2020, Vol. 17, Iss. 2). Without disputing its provisions in any way, the author attempts to take a closer look into the present tendency to omit patronymics or even abhor their use. Recognizing this as a growing trend in the Russian culture, the author reflects upon its causes, foremost of which is the general aversion for all the formal manifestations of the Soviet system. Since the use of patronymics (in the official formula) became mandatory exactly after 1917, it is commonly perceived as a Soviet relic. The second reason is the adoption of Western naming practices not requiring the use of a father’s name — due to Russia’s greater involvement in the international communication, extensive overseas travelling, and fluency in foreign languages, primarily English. The issue of the required use of patronymic in official documents is particularly acute when children from mixed families obtain Russian citizenship. Other factors for doing away with patronymics include Russian media language, as in most news programs and talk shows it is carefully avoided, and the increase in the number of single-parent families (no father) where the need to register a patronymic entails complex formal and ethical problems. Yet, however pertinent these problems are in the modern society, the author considers them relatively marginal and argues the relevance of patronymics for modern Russian culture and the naming practice. The author supports this view by giving evidence from Internet forums, as well as the author’s personal experience.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. ix85 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Honda ◽  
D. Maruyama ◽  
H. Kurihara ◽  
A.M. Maeshima ◽  
S. Yuda ◽  
...  

Endoscopy ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 37-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Al Nakib ◽  
S. Radhakrishnan ◽  
H. Al Liddawi ◽  
G.S. Jacob ◽  
A. Al Ruwaih

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 2105-2110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel R. Fernandes ◽  
Liliane C. Meireles ◽  
Luís Carrilho-Ribeiro ◽  
José Velosa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document