Inelastic Response of Base-Isolated Tall Buildings under Nonstationary Winds: Response History Analysis and Statistical Linearization Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 147 (10) ◽  
pp. 04021067
Author(s):  
Changda Feng ◽  
Xinzhong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Tall Buildings ◽  
Statistical Linearization ◽  
Inelastic Response ◽  
History Analysis ◽  
Response History Analysis

scholarly journals A Multimode Adaptive Pushover Procedure for Seismic Assessment of Integral Bridges

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Mohtashami ◽  
Ahmad Shooshtari
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Demand Curve ◽  
Inelastic Response ◽  
Higher Modes ◽  
Seismic Performance Evaluation ◽  
History Analysis ◽  
Integral Bridges ◽  
Response History Analysis ◽  
Modal Mass ◽  
Adaptive Pushover

This paper presents a new adaptive pushover procedure to account for the effect of higher modes in order to accurately estimate the seismic response of bridges. The effect of higher modes is considered by introducing a minimum value for the total effective modal mass. The proposed method employs enough number of modes to ensure that the defined total effective modal mass participates in all increments of the pushover loading. An adaptive demand curve is also developed for assessment of the seismic demand. The efficiency and robustness of the proposed method are demonstrated by conducting a parametric study. The analysis includes 18 four-span integral bridges with various heights of piers. The inelastic response history analysis is employed as reference solution in this study. Numerical results indicate excellent accuracy of the proposed method in assessment of the seismic response. For most bridges investigated in this study, the difference between the estimated response of the proposed method and the inelastic response history analysis is less than 25% for displacements and 10% for internal forces. This indicates a very good accuracy compared to available pushover procedures in the literature. The proposed method is therefore recommended to be applied to the seismic performance evaluation of integral bridges for engineering applications.

scholarly journals Ground motion input for nonlinear response history analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-133
Author(s):  
Gareth J. Morris ◽  
Andrew J. Thompson ◽  
James N. Dismuke ◽  
Brendon A. Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Nonlinear Response ◽  
Time History ◽  
Tall Buildings ◽  
Nonlinear Time History Analysis ◽  
Existing Buildings ◽  
Ground Motion Selection ◽  
History Analysis ◽  
Response History Analysis ◽  
Nonlinear Response History Analysis

Nonlinear response history analysis (NLRHA), or so-called “nonlinear time history analysis”, is adopted by practicing structural engineers who implement performance-based seismic design and/or assessment procedures. One important aspect in obtaining reliable output from the NLRHA procedure is the input ground motion records. The underlying intention of ground motion selection and amplitude-scaling procedures is to ensure the input for NLRHA is representative of the ground shaking hazard level, for a given site and structure. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the salient limitations of the ground motion selection and scaling requirements in Sections 5.5 and 6.4 of the New Zealand (NZ) loading standard NZS 1170.5 (2004). From a NZ regulatory perspective; there is no specific framework for seismic hazard analysis and ground motion selection (thus self-regulation is the current norm). In contrast, NZS 1170.5 contains many prescriptive requirements for scaling and applying records which are challenging to satisfy in practice. Also discussed within, there are implications for more modern guidance documents in NZ, such as the 2017 “Assessment Guidelines” for existing buildings, which cite NZS 1170.5, a standard which is at least 16 years old (draft issued in 2002). To emphasize the above issues with NZS 1170.5, this paper presents a summary of the more contemporary approaches in the US standards ASCE 7-16 (new buildings) and ASCE 41-17 (existing buildings), along with some examples of the more stringent US requirements for Tall Buildings.

Evaluation of Modal Pushover–Based Scaling of One Component of Ground Motion: Tall Buildings

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 1469-1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erol Kalkan ◽  
Anil K. Chopra
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motions ◽  
Tall Buildings ◽  
Accurate Estimate ◽  
Existing Structures ◽  
History Analysis ◽  
Scaling Procedure ◽  
Response History Analysis ◽  
Performance Based Seismic Design ◽  
Nonlinear Response History Analysis ◽  
Modal Pushover

Nonlinear response history analysis (RHA) is now increasingly used for performance-based seismic design of tall buildings. Required for nonlinear RHAs is a set of ground motions selected and scaled appropriately so that analysis results would be accurate (unbiased) and efficient (having relatively small dispersion). This paper evaluates accuracy and efficiency of recently developed modal pushover– based scaling (MPS) method to scale ground motions for tall buildings. The procedure presented explicitly considers structural strength and is based on the standard intensity measure (IM) of spectral acceleration in a form convenient for evaluating existing structures or proposed designs for new structures. Based on results presented for two actual buildings (19 and 52 stories, respectively), it is demonstrated that the MPS procedure provided a highly accurate estimate of the engineering demand parameters (EDPs), accompanied by significantly reduced record-to-record variability of the responses. In addition, the MPS procedure is shown to be superior to the scaling procedure specified in the ASCE/SEI 7-05 document.

On a Process of Rapid Estimation of Seismic Demands for Generic Steel Frame Structures

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiung-Yueh Lin ◽  
Wei-Zhi Chen ◽  
Tysh-Shang Jan
Keyword(s):  
Pushover Analysis ◽  
Tall Buildings ◽  
Frame Structures ◽  
Seismic Demands ◽  
Higher Mode Effects ◽  
Mode Effects ◽  
History Analysis ◽  
Story Drift ◽  
Response History Analysis ◽  
Nonlinear Response History Analysis

The seismic demands of tall buildings can be evaluated by nonlinear response history analysis with some more representative, site-dependent, earthquakes, or by pushover analysis. However, the process of the evaluation is tedious and time consuming. Therefore, it is desirable to have a simplified process that provides quick and reasonable estimates of seismic demands, especially in the stage of conceptual (preliminary) design. Gupta & Krawinkler (2000) has reached on a process in the estimation of roof and story drift demands for frame structures from the spectral displacement at the first period of the structure, through a series of modification factors, accounting for MDOF effects, inelasticity effects, and P-delta effects. It is found that this process can estimate seismic demands reasonably, provided that no negative post-yield story stiffness exists. Also, the modification factors are uniform or with reasonable dispersion, except for structures dominated by higher mode effects. This study has conducted a similar research by performing simulations on Taiwan code–compliant structures of different heights (2,5,10,20 and 30 stories), located in different seismic zones and subjected to sets of local ground motions. The feature of this study is that the seismic demands are estimated from the SRSS of the elastic, modal roof displacements of the structure, instead of the first mode spectral displacement. The simulation results have shown that the modification factors are more promising — uniform or with more reasonable dispersion — even the structure is dominated by high mode effects. Therefore, it is concluded that the process proposed in this study is a feasible method and the modification factors obtained in this study are useful for local engineer in engineering applications.

A subset of CyberShake ground-motion time series for response-history analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 875529302098197
Author(s):  
Jack W Baker ◽  
Sanaz Rezaeian ◽  
Christine A Goulet ◽  
Nicolas Luco ◽  
Ganyu Teng
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Motion Time ◽  
History Analysis ◽  
Response History Analysis ◽  
Simulated Ground Motions

This manuscript describes a subset of CyberShake numerically simulated ground motions that were selected and vetted for use in engineering response-history analyses. Ground motions were selected that have seismological properties and response spectra representative of conditions in the Los Angeles area, based on disaggregation of seismic hazard. Ground motions were selected from millions of available time series and were reviewed to confirm their suitability for response-history analysis. The processes used to select the time series, the characteristics of the resulting data, and the provided documentation are described in this article. The resulting data and documentation are available electronically.

scholarly journals Evaluation of a Modified MPA Procedure Assuming Higher Modes as Elastic to Estimate Seismic Demands

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 757-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil K. Chopra ◽  
Rakesh K. Goel ◽  
Chatpan Chintanapakdee
Keyword(s):  
Structural Engineering ◽  
Pushover Analysis ◽  
Computational Effort ◽  
Attractive Alternative ◽  
Engineering Practice ◽  
Seismic Demands ◽  
History Analysis ◽  
Modes Of Vibration ◽  
Response History Analysis ◽  
Damped Systems

The modal pushover analysis (MPA) procedure, which includes the contributions of all significant modes of vibration, estimates seismic demands much more accurately than current pushover procedures used in structural engineering practice. Outlined in this paper is a modified MPA (MMPA) procedure wherein the response contributions of higher vibration modes are computed by assuming the building to be linearly elastic, thus reducing the computational effort. After outlining such a modified procedure, its accuracy is evaluated for a variety of frame buildings and ground motion ensembles. Although it is not necessarily more accurate than the MPA procedure, the MMPA procedure is an attractive alternative for practical application because it leads to a larger estimate of seismic demands, improving the accuracy of the MPA results in some cases (relative to nonlinear response history analysis) and increasing their conservatism in others. However, such conservatism is unacceptably large for lightly damped systems, with damping significantly less than 5%. Thus the MMPA procedure is not recommended for such systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document