Thickness Calculation of Accumulative Damaged Zone by Rock Mass Blasting Based on Hoek–Brown Failure Criterion

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfeng Tu ◽  
Liping Li ◽  
Zongqing Zhou ◽  
Chengshun Shang
Keyword(s):  
Rock Mass ◽  
Failure Criterion ◽  
Damaged Zone

scholarly journals The Method of Determining Excavation Damaged Zone by Acoustic Test and the Application in Engineering Cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Qian-Cheng Sun ◽  
Hao-Sen Guo ◽  
Zhi-Hua Xu ◽  
Yue Liu ◽  
Xiao Xu
Keyword(s):  
Rock Mass ◽  
Damage Evolution ◽  
Hard Rock ◽  
Damage Zone ◽  
Jointed Rock ◽  
Jointed Rock Mass ◽  
Surrounding Rock ◽  
Excavation Damaged Zone ◽  
Damaged Zone ◽  
Columnar Jointed Rock Mass

It is very important to accurately determine the depth of excavation damaged zone for underground engineering excavation and surrounding rock stability evaluation, and it can be measured by acoustic test, but there is no quantitative method for analysis of the results, and it relies heavily on the experience of engineers, which leads to the low reliability of the results and also limits the application of the acoustic method. According to substantial field test data and the feedback of surrounding rock support parameters, the boundary method is proposed to determine the depth of excavation damaged zone in surrounding rock based on the relation between the ultrasonic velocity of measured point and the background wave velocity of rock mass. When the method is applied to the columnar jointed rock mass of Baihetan and the deep-buried hard rock of Jinping, the excavation damaged zone was well judged. The results in the Baihetan project show that the proposed method of determining excavation damage zone by the acoustic test can well demonstrate the anisotropy characteristics of the columnar jointed rock mass, and the damage evolution characteristics of jointed rock mass at the same position can also be obtained accurately. Moreover, the method also can accurately reveal the damage evolution process of the deep-buried hard rock under the condition of high ground stress, which proved the applicability of this method in jointed or nonjointed rock masses.

scholarly journals LSSVM-Based Rock Failure Criterion and Its Application in Numerical Simulation

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changxing Zhu ◽  
Hongbo Zhao ◽  
Zhongliang Ru
Keyword(s):  
Rock Mass ◽  
Failure Criterion ◽  
Nonlinear Problems ◽  
Failure Criteria ◽  
Rock Failure ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Failure Behavior ◽  
Circular Tunnel ◽  
Vector Machines

A rock failure criterion is very important for the prediction of the failure of rocks or rock masses in rock mechanics and engineering. Least squares support vector machines (LSSVM) are a powerful tool for addressing complex nonlinear problems. This paper describes a LSSVM-based rock failure criterion for analyzing the deformation of a circular tunnel under differentin situstresses without assuming a function form. First, LSSVM was used to represent the nonlinear relationship between the mechanical properties of rock and the failure behavior of the rock in order to construct a rock failure criterion based on experimental data. Then, this was used in a hypothetical numerical analysis of a circular tunnel to analyze the mechanical behavior of the rock mass surrounding the tunnel. The Mohr-Coulomb and Hoek-Brown failure criteria were also used to analyze the same case, and the results were compared; these clearly indicate that LSSVM can be used to establish a rock failure criterion and to predict the failure of a rock mass during excavation of a circular tunnel.

Assessing Wellbore Stability With a Modified Lade Failure Criterion

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Babak Bahrami ◽  
Ali Sadatshojaie ◽  
David A Wood
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Rock Mass ◽  
Failure Criterion ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Poisson Ratio ◽  
Failure Criteria ◽  
Wellbore Stability ◽  
Depth Interval ◽  
Gas Reservoirs ◽  
Operational Processes

Abstract The importance of evaluating wellbore stability in analyzing and estimating the efficiency of drilling directionally into oil and gas reservoirs is well known. Geomechanical data and failure criterion can be used to model and control rock mass behavior in response to the stresses imposed upon it. Understanding and managing the risks of rock mass deformation significantly improve operational processes such as wellbore stability, sand production, and hydraulic fracturing. The modified Lade failure criterion is established as the most precise failure criterion based on previous studies. By combining it with tensions around the wellbore, a novel relationship is derived for determining the stable mud window. To investigate the accuracy of the new relationship, two geomechanical models (neural network and empirical correlations) for a one-directional wellbore are developed and their performance compared with two other failure criteria (Hoek–Brown and Mogi–Coulomb). The geomechanical parameters (Young’s modulus, Poisson ratio, uniaxial compressive strength, and internal friction coefficient) obtained from the models show that neural network configurations perform better than those built with the empirical equation. The horizontal minimum and maximum stress values across the depth interval of interest (2347–2500 m) are established for a case study reservoir. The model provides an accurate prediction of wellbore instability when applying the modified Lade criterion; the stable mud weight is derived with improved precision compared to the other failure criteria evaluated. A key advantage of the developed method is that it does not require input knowledge of the reservoir’s structural boundaries (e.g., the fault regime) or core test data.

scholarly journals The ARMR Classification System and the Modified Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion Compared to Directional Shear Strength Models for Anisotropic Rock Masses

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Bar ◽  
Charalampos Saroglou
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Rock Mass ◽  
Failure Criterion ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Failure Criteria ◽  
Rock Masses ◽  
Anisotropic Rock ◽  
Anisotropic Rock Mass ◽  
Degree Of Anisotropy ◽  
Strength Models

The anisotropic rock mass rating classification system, ARMR, has been developed in conjunction with the Modified Hoek-Brown failure to deal with varying shear strength with respect to the orientation and degree of anisotropy within an anisotropic rock mass. Conventionally, ubiquitous-joint or directional shear strength models have assumed a general rock mass strength, typically estimated using the Hoek-Brown failure criterion, and applied a directional weakness in a given orientation depending on the anisotropic nature of the rock mass. Shear strength of the directional weakness is typically estimated using the Barton-Bandis failure criterion, or on occasion, the Mohr-Coulomb failure criteria. Directional shear strength models such as these often formed the basis of continuum models for slopes and underground excavations in anisotropic rock masses. This paper compares ARMR and the Modified Hoek-Brown failure criterion to the conventional directional shear strength models using a case study from Western Australia.

A method for assessment of excavation damaged zone (EDZ) of a rock mass and its application to a dam foundation case

2009 ◽  
Vol 104 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 254-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faquan Wu ◽  
Jianyou Liu ◽  
Tong Liu ◽  
Huaze Zhuang ◽  
Changgen Yan
Keyword(s):  
Rock Mass ◽  
Dam Foundation ◽  
Excavation Damaged Zone ◽  
Damaged Zone

scholarly journals Comparative Study of the Excavation Damage and Rockburst of the Deeply Buried Jinping II Diversion Tunnels Using a TBM and the Drilling-Blasting Method

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Jing Yang ◽  
Xing-Guo Yang ◽  
Jia-Wen Zhou ◽  
Yong Liu ◽  
Bao-Shun Dong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rock Mass ◽  
Stress Concentration ◽  
High Stress ◽  
Tunnel Boring Machine ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Surrounding Rock ◽  
High In Situ Stress ◽  
Damaged Zone ◽  
Blasting Method

The rock mass failure induced by high in-situ stresses during the excavation of deep diversion tunnels is one of the key problems in the construction of the Jinping II Hydropower Station. Based on the results of acoustic wave tests and rockburst statistical analysis conducted, this study focuses on the excavation damaged zone (EDZ) and rockburst events in the Jinping II diversion tunnels excavated using the tunnel boring machine (TBM) method and the drilling-blasting method. The unloading failure mechanism and the rockburst induced by the two different excavation methods were compared and analyzed. The results indicate that, due to the different stress adjustment processes, the degree of damage to the surrounding rock mass excavated using the drilling-blasting method was more serious than that using the TBM method. The EDZ induced by the TBM was usually distributed evenly along the edge of the excavation surface. While, the drilling-blasting method was more likely to cause stress concentration, resulting in a deeper EDZ in local areas. However, the TBM excavation method can cause other problems in high in-situ stress areas, such as strong rockbursts. The drilling-blasting method is more prone to structural controlled failure of the surrounding rock mass, while the TBM method would induce high stress concentration near the edge of excavation and more widely distributed of stress adjustment induced failure. As a result, the scale and frequency of the rockburst events generated by the TBM were significantly greater than those caused by the drilling-blasting method during the excavation of Jinping II diversion tunnels. The TBM method should be used carefully for tunnel excavation in high in-situ stress areas with burial depths of greater than 2000 m. If it is necessary to use the TBM method after a comprehensive selection, it is suggested that equipment adaptability improvement, advanced prediction, and prediction technology be used.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document