Dynamic Strength of Hydraulic Fill

1976 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 641-646
Author(s):  
Richard L. Meehan
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 04020446
Author(s):  
Sayantan Chakraborty ◽  
Tejo V. Bheemasetti ◽  
Anand J. Puppala ◽  
Jasaswee T. Das ◽  
Santiago R. Caballero O

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 217-226
Author(s):  
Yu.I. Kutepov ◽  
◽  
A.S. Mironov ◽  
Yu.Yu. Kutepov ◽  
M.V. Sablin ◽  
...  

A description is given of the experimental technique devised to apply the method outlined theoretically in part I to the measurement of the dynamic compressive yield strength of various steels, duralumin, copper, lead, iron and silver. A polished piece of armour steel was employed as a target, and cylindrical specimens were fired at it at various measured velocities from Service weapons. The distance between the weapon and target was made short to ensure normal impact, and apparatus was devised for the precise measurement of striking velocity over this short range. The dynamic compressive yield strength was computed from the density of the specimen, the striking velocity, and from measurements of the dimensions of the test piece before and after test. Details are given of the accuracy of the various measurements, and of their effect on the values of yield strength. The method was found to be inaccurate at low and high velocities. For instance, with mild steel, satisfactory results were only obtainable within the range 400 to 2500 ft. /sec. The range of velocities within which satisfactory results could be obtained varied with the quality of the material tested, soft metals giving results within a much lower range than that necessary for harder materials. Because of its failure at low velocities, the method could not be employed to bridge the gap between static and dynamic tests. The rate of strain employed in the dynamic tests could not be measured, but was estimated to be of the order of 10,000 in. /in. /sec. With the materials tested little change of dynamic strength occurred within the range of striking velocities employed, probably because the rate of strain did not vary to any great extent with the striking velocity. Within the range of weapons available, that is, from a 0·303 in. rifle up to a 13 pdr. gun (calibre 3·12 in.), little change of dynamic strength occurred with alteration of the initial dimensions of the specimens, probably because the corresponding change of rate of strain was not large. In general, the dynamic compressive yield strength S was greater than the static strength Y represented by the compressive stress giving 0·2% permanent strain. For steels of various types, regardless of chemical composition and heat treatment, there was a relation between S / Y and the static strength Y , the ratio decreasing from approximately 3 when Y was 20 tons/sq. in. to 1 when Y was 120 tons/sq. in. A similar relation occurred with duralumin, S / Y varying from 2·5 at Y = 8 tons/sq. in. to 1·4 at Y = 25 tons/sq. in. Dynamic compressive yield values were obtained for soft materials such as pure lead, copper and Armco iron, which, under static conditions, gave no definite yield values. A plot of the unstrained length of the specimen X , expressed as X / L (where L = initial overall length), versus the final overall length L 1 , expressed as L 1 / L , was made for the various materials. Any specified value of X / L was associated with greater values of L 1 / L for the more ductile materials, such as copper and lead, than for the brittle materials, such as armour plate and duralumin.


Fluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Ivan Smirnov ◽  
Natalia Mikhailova

Researchers are still working on the development of models that facilitate the accurate estimation of acoustic cavitation threshold. In this paper, we have analyzed the possibility of using the incubation time criterion to calculate the threshold of the onset of acoustic cavitation depending on the ultrasound frequency, hydrostatic pressure, and temperature of a liquid. This criterion has been successfully used by earlier studies to calculate the dynamic strength of solids and has recently been proposed in an adapted version for calculating the cavitation threshold. The analysis is carried out for various experimental data for water presented in the literature. Although the criterion assumes the use of macroparameters of a liquid, we also considered the possibility of taking into account the size of cavitation nuclei and its influence on the calculation result. We compared the results of cavitation threshold calculations done using the incubation time criterion of cavitation and the classical nucleation theory. Our results showed that the incubation time criterion more qualitatively models the results of experiments using only three parameters of the liquid. We then discussed a possible relationship between the parameters of the two approaches. The results of our study showed that the criterion under consideration has a good potential and can be conveniently used for applications where there are special requirements for ultrasound parameters, maximum negative pressure, and liquid temperature.


2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 991-1010
Author(s):  
Henrik Petré ◽  
Erik Hemmingsson ◽  
Hans Rosdahl ◽  
Niklas Psilander

Abstract Background The effect of concurrent training on the development of maximal strength is unclear, especially in individuals with different training statuses. Objective The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis study was to compare the effect of concurrent resistance and endurance training with that of resistance training only on the development of maximal dynamic strength in untrained, moderately trained, and trained individuals. Methods On the basis of the predetermined criteria, 27 studies that compared effects between concurrent and resistance training only on lower-body 1-repetition maximum (1RM) strength were included. The effect size (ES), calculated as the standardised difference in mean, was extracted from each study, pooled, and analysed with a random-effects model. Results The 1RM for leg press and squat exercises was negatively affected by concurrent training in trained individuals (ES =  – 0.35, p < 0.01), but not in moderately trained ( – 0.20, p = 0.08) or untrained individuals (ES = 0.03, p = 0.87) as compared to resistance training only. A subgroup analysis revealed that the negative effect observed in trained individuals occurred only when resistance and endurance training were conducted within the same training session (ES same session =  – 0.66, p < 0.01 vs. ES different sessions =  – 0.10, p = 0.55). Conclusion This study demonstrated the novel and quantifiable effects of training status on lower-body strength development and shows that the addition of endurance training to a resistance training programme may have a negative impact on lower-body strength development in trained, but not in moderately trained or untrained individuals. This impairment seems to be more pronounced when training is performed within the same session than in different sessions. Trained individuals should therefore consider separating endurance from resistance training during periods where the development of dynamic maximal strength is prioritised.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document