Dark matter and gas density profiles — a consequence of entropy bifurcation

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. P. Leubner
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Density Profiles ◽  
Gas Density

scholarly journals Are ultra-diffuse galaxies Milky Way-sized?

2020 ◽  
Vol 633 ◽  
pp. L3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nushkia Chamba ◽  
Ignacio Trujillo ◽  
Johan H. Knapen
Keyword(s):  
Star Formation ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Size Range ◽  
Mass Density ◽  
Effective Radius ◽  
Density Profiles ◽  
Gas Density ◽  
Undesirable Consequence ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Density Threshold

Now almost 70 years since its introduction, the effective or half-light radius has become a very popular choice for characterising galaxy size. However, the effective radius measures the concentration of light within galaxies and thus does not capture our intuitive definition of size which is related to the edge or boundary of objects. For this reason, we aim to demonstrate the undesirable consequence of using the effective radius to draw conclusions about the nature of faint ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs) when compared to dwarfs and Milky Way-like galaxies. Instead of the effective radius, we use a measure of galaxy size based on the location of the gas density threshold required for star formation. Compared to the effective radius, this physically motivated definition places the sizes much closer to the boundary of a galaxy. Therefore, considering the sizes and stellar mass density profiles of UDGs and regular dwarfs, we find that the UDGs have sizes that are within the size range of dwarfs. We also show that currently known UDGs do not have sizes comparable to Milky Way-like objects. We find that, on average, UDGs are ten times smaller in extension than Milky Way-like galaxies. These results show that the use of size estimators sensitive to the concentration of light can lead to misleading results.

scholarly journals Quantifying tidal stream disruption in a simulated Milky Way

2017 ◽  
Vol 470 (1) ◽  
pp. 522-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Sandford ◽  
Andreas H. W. Küpper ◽  
Kathryn V. Johnston ◽  
Jürg Diemand
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Galactic Halo ◽  
Mass Range ◽  
Galactic Centre ◽  
High Dimensions ◽  
Density Profiles ◽  
Upper Limits ◽  
Tidal Stream ◽  
Tidal Streams

Abstract Simulations of tidal streams show that close encounters with dark matter subhaloes induce density gaps and distortions in on-sky path along the streams. Accordingly, observing disrupted streams in the Galactic halo would substantiate the hypothesis that dark matter substructure exists there, while in contrast, observing collimated streams with smoothly varying density profiles would place strong upper limits on the number density and mass spectrum of subhaloes. Here, we examine several measures of stellar stream ‘disruption' and their power to distinguish between halo potentials with and without substructure and with different global shapes. We create and evolve a population of 1280 streams on a range of orbits in the Via Lactea II simulation of a Milky Way-like halo, replete with a full mass range of Λcold dark matter subhaloes, and compare it to two control stream populations evolved in smooth spherical and smooth triaxial potentials, respectively. We find that the number of gaps observed in a stellar stream is a poor indicator of the halo potential, but that (i) the thinness of the stream on-sky, (ii) the symmetry of the leading and trailing tails and (iii) the deviation of the tails from a low-order polynomial path on-sky (‘path regularity') distinguish between the three potentials more effectively. We furthermore find that globular cluster streams on low-eccentricity orbits far from the galactic centre (apocentric radius ∼30–80 kpc) are most powerful in distinguishing between the three potentials. If they exist, such streams will shortly be discoverable and mapped in high dimensions with near-future photometric and spectroscopic surveys.

scholarly journals Isolated dwarf galaxies: from cuspy to flat dark matter density profiles and metalicity gradients

2010 ◽  
Vol 514 ◽  
pp. A47 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pasetto ◽  
E. K. Grebel ◽  
P. Berczik ◽  
R. Spurzem ◽  
W. Dehnen
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dwarf Galaxies ◽  
Matter Density ◽  
Density Profiles ◽  
Dark Matter Density

scholarly journals NIHAO – IV: core creation and destruction in dark matter density profiles across cosmic time

2016 ◽  
Vol 456 (4) ◽  
pp. 3542-3552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edouard Tollet ◽  
Andrea V. Macciò ◽  
Aaron A. Dutton ◽  
Greg S. Stinson ◽  
Liang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Cosmic Time ◽  
Matter Density ◽  
Density Profiles ◽  
Dark Matter Density

Dark matter distribution in superthin galaxies

2020 ◽  
Vol 495 (4) ◽  
pp. 3722-3726
Author(s):  
Ilia Kalashnikov
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Surface Density ◽  
Distribution Density ◽  
Spherically Symmetric ◽  
Matter Distribution ◽  
Galactic Disc ◽  
Density Profiles ◽  
Visible Matter ◽  
Simple Physical Model ◽  
Dark Matter Distribution

ABSTRACT This paper presents a new method of calculating dark matter density profiles for superthin axial symmetric galaxies without a bulge. This method is based on a simple physical model, which includes an infinitely thin galactic disc immersed in a spherically symmetric halo of dark matter. To obtain the desired distribution density, it suffices to know a distribution of visible matter surface density in a galaxy and a dependence of angular velocity on the radius. As a byproduct, the well-known expression, which reproduces surface density of a superthin galaxy expressed through a rotation law, was obtained.

scholarly journals The Milky Way’s halo and subhaloes in self-interacting dark matter

2019 ◽  
Vol 490 (2) ◽  
pp. 2117-2123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor H Robles ◽  
Tyler Kelley ◽  
James S Bullock ◽  
Manoj Kaplinghat
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Cold Dark Matter ◽  
Elastic Cross Section ◽  
Too Big To Fail ◽  
Density Profiles ◽  
Potential Core ◽  
Cold Dark Matter Model ◽  
Matter Model ◽  
Satellite Galaxies ◽  
Dark Matter Model

ABSTRACT We perform high-resolution simulations of an MW-like galaxy in a self-interacting cold dark matter model with elastic cross-section over mass of $1~\rm cm^2\, g^{-1}$ (SIDM) and compare to a model without self-interactions (CDM). We run our simulations with and without a time-dependent embedded potential to capture effects of the baryonic disc and bulge contributions. The CDM and SIDM simulations with the embedded baryonic potential exhibit remarkably similar host halo profiles, subhalo abundances, and radial distributions within the virial radius. The SIDM host halo is denser in the centre than the CDM host and has no discernible core, in sharp contrast to the case without the baryonic potential (core size ${\sim}7 \, \rm kpc$). The most massive subhaloes (with $V_{\mathrm{peak}}\gt 20 \, \rm km\, s^{-1}$) in our SIDM simulations, expected to host the classical satellite galaxies, have density profiles that are less dense than their CDM analogues at radii less than 500 pc but the deviation diminishes for less massive subhaloes. With the baryonic potential included in the CDM and SIDM simulations, the most massive subhaloes do not display the too-big-to-fail problem. However, the least dense among the massive subhaloes in both these simulations tend to have the smallest pericenter values, a trend that is not apparent among the bright MW satellite galaxies.

scholarly journals New mass bound on fermionic dark matter from a combined analysis of classical dSphs

2019 ◽  
Vol 487 (4) ◽  
pp. 5711-5720 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Savchenko ◽  
A Rudakovskyi
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Lower Bound ◽  
Cold Dark Matter ◽  
Pauli Exclusion Principle ◽  
Dark Matter Halo ◽  
Exclusion Principle ◽  
Fermion Mass ◽  
Density Profiles ◽  
Combined Analysis ◽  
Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies

ABSTRACTDwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSphs) are the most compact dark-matter-dominated objects observed so far. The Pauli exclusion principle limits the number of fermionic dark matter particles that can compose a dSph halo. This results in a well-known lower bound on their particle mass. So far, such bounds were obtained from the analysis of individual dSphs. In this paper, we model dark matter halo density profiles via the semi-analytical approach and analyse the data from eight ‘classical’ dSphs assuming the same mass of dark matter fermion in each object. First, we find out that modelling of Carina dSph results in a much worse fitting quality compared to the other seven objects. From the combined analysis of the kinematic data of the remaining seven ‘classical’ dSphs, we obtain a new 2σ lower bound of m ≳ 190 eV on the dark matter fermion mass. In addition, by combining a sub-sample of four dSphs – Draco, Fornax, Leo I, and Sculptor – we conclude that 220 eV fermionic dark matter appears to be preferred over the standard cold dark matter at about the 2σ level. However, this result becomes insignificant if all seven objects are included in the analysis. Future improvement of the obtained bound requires more detailed data, both from ‘classical’ and ultra-faint dSphs.

scholarly journals Void Dynamics

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (S308) ◽  
pp. 530-537
Author(s):  
Nelson D. Padilla ◽  
Dante Paz ◽  
Marcelo Lares ◽  
Laura Ceccarelli ◽  
Diego Garcí a Lambas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Correlation Functions ◽  
Cross Correlation ◽  
Cosmological Parameters ◽  
Matter Field ◽  
Sloan Digital Sky Survey ◽  
Density Profiles ◽  
Peculiar Velocities ◽  
Sky Survey ◽  
Space Data

AbstractCosmic voids are becoming key players in testing the physics of our Universe. Here we concentrate on the abundances and the dynamics of voids as these are among the best candidates to provide information on cosmological parameters. Cai, Padilla & Li (2014) use the abundance of voids to tell apart Hu & Sawicki f(R) models from General Relativity. An interesting result is that even though, as expected, voids in the dark matter field are emptier in f(R) gravity due to the fifth force expelling away from the void centres, this result is reversed when haloes are used to find voids. The abundance of voids in this case becomes even lower in f(R) compared to GR for large voids. Still, the differences are significant and this provides a way to tell apart these models. The velocity field differences between f(R) and GR, on the other hand, are the same for halo voids and for dark matter voids. Paz et al. (2013), concentrate on the velocity profiles around voids. First they show the necessity of four parameters to describe the density profiles around voids given two distinct void populations, voids-in-voids and voids-in-clouds. This profile is used to predict peculiar velocities around voids, and the combination of the latter with void density profiles allows the construction of model void-galaxy cross-correlation functions with redshift space distortions. When these models are tuned to fit the measured correlation functions for voids and galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, small voids are found to be of the void-in-cloud type, whereas larger ones are consistent with being void-in-void. This is a novel result that is obtained directly from redshift space data around voids. These profiles can be used to remove systematics on void-galaxy Alcock-Pacinsky tests coming from redshift-space distortions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document