Plasma sheath thickness in radio‐frequency discharges

1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 2657-2660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuki Mutsukura ◽  
Kenji Kobayashi ◽  
Yoshio Machi
1997 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 2060-2071 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. Nienhuis ◽  
W. J. Goedheer ◽  
E. A. G. Hamers ◽  
W. G. J. H. M. van Sark ◽  
J. Bezemer

1963 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 1309-1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Mavrodineanu ◽  
R.C. Hughes

2001 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 2398
Author(s):  
DAI ZHONG-LING ◽  
WANG YOU-NIAN ◽  
MA TENG-CAI

1991 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Meyyappan ◽  
T.R. Govindan

2019 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 043303 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Derzsi ◽  
B. Horváth ◽  
I. Korolov ◽  
Z. Donkó ◽  
J. Schulze

2019 ◽  
Vol 630 ◽  
pp. A41 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Wattieaux ◽  
N. Gilet ◽  
P. Henri ◽  
X. Vallières ◽  
L. Bucciantini

The response of the mutual impedance probe RPC-MIP on board Rosetta orbiter electrostatically modeled considering an unmagnetized and collisionless plasma with two Maxwellian electron populations. A vacuum sheath surrounding the probe was considered in our model in order to take the ion sheath into account that is located around the probe, which is immersed in the cometary plasma. For the first time, the simulated results are consistent with the data collected around comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (67P), but strong discrepancies were identified with the previous simulations that neglected the plasma sheath around the probe. We studied the influence of the sheath thickness and of the electron populations. This work helps to better understand the initially unexpected responses of the mutual impedance probe that were acquired during the Rosetta mission. It suggests that two electron populations exist in the cometary plasma of 67P.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document