Dynamic Occlusion and Motion Parallax in Depth Perception

Perception ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Ono ◽  
Brian J Rogers ◽  
Masao Ohmi ◽  
Mika E Ono

Random-dot techniques were used to examine the interactions between the depth cues of dynamic occlusion and motion parallax in the perception of three-dimensional (3-D) structures, in two different situations: (a) when an observer moved laterally with respect to a rigid 3-D structure, and (b) when surfaces at different distances moved with respect to a stationary observer. In condition (a), the extent of accretion/deletion (dynamic occlusion) and the amount of relative motion (motion parallax) were both linked to the motion of the observer. When the two cues specified opposite, and therefore contradictory, depth orders, the perceived order in depth of the simulated surfaces was dependent on the magnitude of the depth separation. For small depth separations, motion parallax determined the perceived order, whereas for large separations it was determined by dynamic occlusion. In condition (b), where the motion parallax cues for depth order were inherently ambiguous, depth order was determined principally by the unambiguous occlusion information.

2016 ◽  
Vol 371 (1697) ◽  
pp. 20150256 ◽  
Author(s):  
HyunGoo R. Kim ◽  
Dora E. Angelaki ◽  
Gregory C. DeAngelis

In addition to depth cues afforded by binocular vision, the brain processes relative motion signals to perceive depth. When an observer translates relative to their visual environment, the relative motion of objects at different distances (motion parallax) provides a powerful cue to three-dimensional scene structure. Although perception of depth based on motion parallax has been studied extensively in humans, relatively little is known regarding the neural basis of this visual capability. We review recent advances in elucidating the neural mechanisms for representing depth-sign (near versus far) from motion parallax. We examine a potential neural substrate in the middle temporal visual area for depth perception based on motion parallax, and we explore the nature of the signals that provide critical inputs for disambiguating depth-sign. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Vision in our three-dimensional world’.


Perception ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Rogers ◽  
Maureen Graham

The perspective transformations of the retinal image, produced by either the movement of an observer or the movement of objects in the visual world, were found to produce a reliable, consistent, and unambiguous impression of relative depth in the absence of all other cues to depth and distance. The stimulus displays consisted of computer-generated random-dot patterns that could be transformed by each movement of the observer or the display oscilloscope to simulate the relative movement information produced by a three-dimensional surface. Using a stereoscopic matching task, the second experiment showed that the perceived depth from parallax transformations is in close agreement with the degree of relative image displacement, as well as producing a compelling impression of three-dimensionality not unlike that found with random-dot stereograms.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reuben Rideaux ◽  
William J Harrison

ABSTRACTDiscerning objects from their surrounds (i.e., figure-ground segmentation) in a way that guides adaptive behaviours is a fundamental task of the brain. Neurophysiological work has revealed a class of cells in the macaque visual cortex that may be ideally suited to support this neural computation: border-ownership cells (Zhou, Friedman, & von der Heydt, 2000). These orientation-tuned cells appear to respond conditionally to the borders of objects. A behavioural correlate supporting the existence of these cells in humans was demonstrated using two-dimensional luminance defined objects (von der Heydt, Macuda, & Qiu, 2005). However, objects in our natural visual environments are often signalled by complex cues, such as motion and depth order. Thus, for border-ownership systems to effectively support figure-ground segmentation and object depth ordering, they must have access to information from multiple depth cues with strict depth order selectivity. Here we measure in humans (of both sexes) border-ownership-dependent tilt aftereffects after adapting to figures defined by either motion parallax or binocular disparity. We find that both depth cues produce a tilt aftereffect that is selective for figure-ground depth order. Further, we find the effects of adaptation are transferable between cues, suggesting that these systems may combine depth cues to reduce uncertainty (Bülthoff & Mallot, 1988). These results suggest that border-ownership mechanisms have strict depth order selectivity and access to multiple depth cues that are jointly encoded, providing compelling psychophysical support for their role in figure-ground segmentation in natural visual environments.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTSegmenting a visual object from its surrounds is a critical function that may be supported by “border-ownership” neural systems that conditionally respond to object borders. Psychophysical work indicates these systems are sensitive to objects defined by luminance contrast. To effectively support figure-ground segmentation, however, neural systems supporting border-ownership must have access to information from multiple depth cues and depth order selectivity. We measured border-ownership-dependent tilt aftereffects to figures defined by either motion parallax or binocular disparity and found aftereffects for both depth cues. These effects were transferable between cues, but selective for figure-ground depth order. Our results suggest that the neural systems supporting figure-ground segmentation have strict depth order selectivity and access to multiple depth cues that are jointly encoded.


1996 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 987-995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario F. Mendez ◽  
Monique M. Cherrier ◽  
Robert S. Meadows

Abnormal depth perception contributes to visuospatial deficits in Alzheimer's disease. Disturbances in stereopsis, motion parallax, and the interpretation of static monocular depth cues may result from neuropathology in the visual cortex. We evaluated 15 patients with mild Alzheimer's disease and 15 controls matched for age, sex, and education on measures of local stereopsis (stereoscopic testing), global stereopsis (random dots), motion parallax (Howard-Dolman apparatus), and monocular depth perception by relative size, interposition, and perspective. Compared to controls, the patients were significantly impaired in over-all depth perception. This impairment was largely due to disturbances in local stereopsis and in the interpretation of depth from perspective, independent of other visuospatial functions. Patients with Alzheimer's disease have disturbed interpretation of monocular as well as binocular depth cues. This information could lead to optic interventions to improve their visual depth perception.


2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 638-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanfeng Yuan ◽  
W. L. Sachtler ◽  
Nat Durlach ◽  
Barbara Shinn-Cunningham

Experiments were conducted to determine how the ability to detect and discriminate head-motion parallax depth cues is degraded by time delays between head movement and image update. The stimuli consisted of random-dot patterns that were programmed to appear as one cycle of a sinusoi dal grating when the subject's head moved. The results show that time delay between head movement and image update has essentially no effect on the ability to discrimi nate between two such gratings with different depth char acteristics when the delay is less than or equal to roughly 265 ms.


Perception ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
Harvey R Schiffman ◽  
Richard Lore

The descent behavior to two- and three-dimensional surfaces in a depth situation was measured and compared for 45–50-days-old hooded rats. When depth differences between surfaces were controlled, significantly more descents were made to three-dimensional than to the two-dimensional surface. The results suggest that a three-dimensional surface—more representative of an animal's natural terrain—provides a more informative environment for motion parallax than does a two-dimensional one.


1996 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 659-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keikichi Hayashibe

The range of velocities over which depth perception can be simulated by motion parallax, was studied experimentally. Perception of apparent depth was induced using method of simulated motion parallax. In the condition of ‘observer parallax,’ the range of angular velocity over which apparent depth accompanied by motion was perceived was 0.0048 to 0.048 rad/sec., while velocities for which robust perception of apparent depth was obtained were restricted to the range 0.0010 to 0.0024 rad/sec., and no perceived reversals of depth occurred over this range. No distinct range for robust perception of apparent depth could be found in the condition of ‘stimulus parallax.’ In the case of velocity ratios of 1:1.1 and 1:1.3, the velocity that produced the most robust perception of apparent depth was 0.0024 rad/sec., and inhibition of perceived depth reversals occurred at 0.0010 rad/sec. Under conditions of opposing relative motion, the velocity range over which robust perception of apparent depth was observed was 0.0005 to 0.0010 rad/sec., slightly lower than when both motions were in the same direction.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Maniatis

Motion parallax is conventionally described as a “depth cue.” Rogers & Graham (1979) are credited with providing fairly convincing evidence for this view. Here, I argue that, just as in the case of the other so-called “depth cues,” the claim that “motion parallax” constitutes an independent factor supporting shape and depth perception is circular. Authors offering apparent demonstrations of this cue fail to properly distinguish between proximal and distal stimulus and overlook the fundamental confound of figural organization.


1994 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.M. O'Donnell ◽  
A.J. Smith

This article describes the physiological mechanisms involved in three-dimensional depth perception and presents a variety of distance and depth cues and strategies for detecting and estimating curbs and steps.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document