Retinoic acid triggers c-kit gene expression in spermatogonial stem cells through an enhanceosome constituted between transcription factor binding sites for retinoic acid response element (RARE), spleen focus forming virus proviral integration oncogene (SPFI1) (PU.1) and E26 transformation-specific (ETS)

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swanand Koli ◽  
Ayan Mukherjee ◽  
Kudumula Venkata Rami Reddy

Restricted availability of retinoic acid (RA) in the testicular milieu regulates transcriptional activity of c-kit (KIT, CD117), which aids in the determination of spermatogonial stem-cell differentiation. The effect of RA on c-kit has been reported previously, but its mode of genomic action remains unresolved. We studied the molecular machinery guiding RA responsiveness to the c-kit gene using spermatogonial stem-cell line C18–4 and primary spermatogonial cells. A novel retinoic acid response element (RARE) positioned at –989 nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site (TSS) was identified, providing a binding site for a dimeric RA receptor (i.e. retinoic acid receptor gamma (RARγ) and retinoic X receptor). RA treatment influenced c-kit promoter activity, along with endogenous c-kit expression in C18–4 cells. A comprehensive promoter deletion assay using the pGL3B reporter system characterised the region spanning –271 bp and –1011 bp upstream of the TSS, which function as minimal promoter and maximal promoter, respectively. In silico analysis predicted that the region –1011 to +58 bp comprised the distal enhancer RARE and activators such as spleen focus forming virus proviral integration oncogene (SPFI1) (PU.1), specificity protein 1 (SP1) and four E26 transformation-specific (ETS) tandem binding sites at the proximal region. Gel retardation and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays showed binding for RARγ, PU.1 and SP1 to the predicted consensus binding sequences, whereas GABPα occupied only two out of four ETS binding sites within the c-kit promoter region. We propose that for RA response, an enhanceosome is orchestrated through scaffolding of a CREB-binding protein (CBP)/p300 molecule between RARE and elements in the proximal promoter region, controlling germ-line expression of the c-kit gene. This study outlines the fundamental role played by RARγ, along with other non-RAR transcription factors (PU.1, SP1 and GABPα), in the regulation of c-kit expression in spermatogonial stem cells in response to RA.


2016 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruoyi Gu ◽  
Jun Xu ◽  
Yixiang Lin ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Huijun Wang ◽  
...  


1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 1122-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Schoorlemmer ◽  
A van Puijenbroek ◽  
M van Den Eijnden ◽  
L Jonk ◽  
C Pals ◽  
...  

Expression of Oct4 in embryonic stem cells is controlled by a distal upstream stem cell-specific enhancer that is deactivated during retinoic acid (RA)-induced differentiation by an indirect mechanism not involving binding of RA receptors (H. Okazawa, K. Okamoto, F. Ishino, T. Ishino-Kaneko, S. Takeda, Y. Toyoda, M. Muramatsu, and H. Hamada, EMBO J. 10:2997-3005, 1991). Here we report that in RA-treated P19 embryonal carcinoma cells the Oct4 promoter is also subject to negative regulation by RA. The minimal Oct4 promoter sequence mediating repression consists of a promoter-proximal sequence containing a GC-rich SP1 consensus-like sequence and several hormone response element half-sites that can be arranged into direct repeats with different spacing. The GC box binds a nuclear factor that is invariably present in undifferentiated and RA-treated differentiated P19 cells. By contrast, the hormone response element-containing sequence binds factors that are induced following RA treatment. Mutational analysis and competition experiments show that the functional entity binding the RA-induced factor is a direct repeat sequence with a spacing of one nucleotide, previously shown to be a binding site for COUP transcription factors (COUP-TFs). Cotransfected orphan receptors COUP-TF1, ARP-1, and EAR-2 were able to repress the activity of Oct4 promoter-driven reporters in P19 EC cells, albeit with different efficiencies. Furthermore, the negative transcriptional effect of COUP-TFs is dominant over the activating effect of the Oct4 embryonic stem cell-specific enhancer. These results show that negative regulation of Oct4 expression during RA-induced differentiation of embryonic stem cells is controlled by two different mechanisms, including deactivation of the embryonic stem cell-specific enhancer and promoter silencing by orphan nuclear hormone receptors.



1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 1122-1136
Author(s):  
J Schoorlemmer ◽  
A van Puijenbroek ◽  
M van Den Eijnden ◽  
L Jonk ◽  
C Pals ◽  
...  

Expression of Oct4 in embryonic stem cells is controlled by a distal upstream stem cell-specific enhancer that is deactivated during retinoic acid (RA)-induced differentiation by an indirect mechanism not involving binding of RA receptors (H. Okazawa, K. Okamoto, F. Ishino, T. Ishino-Kaneko, S. Takeda, Y. Toyoda, M. Muramatsu, and H. Hamada, EMBO J. 10:2997-3005, 1991). Here we report that in RA-treated P19 embryonal carcinoma cells the Oct4 promoter is also subject to negative regulation by RA. The minimal Oct4 promoter sequence mediating repression consists of a promoter-proximal sequence containing a GC-rich SP1 consensus-like sequence and several hormone response element half-sites that can be arranged into direct repeats with different spacing. The GC box binds a nuclear factor that is invariably present in undifferentiated and RA-treated differentiated P19 cells. By contrast, the hormone response element-containing sequence binds factors that are induced following RA treatment. Mutational analysis and competition experiments show that the functional entity binding the RA-induced factor is a direct repeat sequence with a spacing of one nucleotide, previously shown to be a binding site for COUP transcription factors (COUP-TFs). Cotransfected orphan receptors COUP-TF1, ARP-1, and EAR-2 were able to repress the activity of Oct4 promoter-driven reporters in P19 EC cells, albeit with different efficiencies. Furthermore, the negative transcriptional effect of COUP-TFs is dominant over the activating effect of the Oct4 embryonic stem cell-specific enhancer. These results show that negative regulation of Oct4 expression during RA-induced differentiation of embryonic stem cells is controlled by two different mechanisms, including deactivation of the embryonic stem cell-specific enhancer and promoter silencing by orphan nuclear hormone receptors.



2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoyi Dong ◽  
Zhouchun Shang ◽  
Longqi Liu ◽  
Chuanyu Liu ◽  
Yuping Ge ◽  
...  

Spermatogenic lineage has been directly generated in spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) conditions from human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs). However, it remains unknown whether mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) can directly differentiate into advanced male germ cell lineage in the same conditions. Here, we showed rather low efficiency of germ-like cell generation from mouse ESCs in SSC conditions. Interestingly, addition of retinoic acid (RA) into SSC conditions enabled efficient differentiation of mouse ESCs into germ-like cells, as shown by the activation of spermatogenesis-associated genes such as Mvh, Dazl, Prdm14, Stella, Scp1, Scp3, Stra8 and Rec8. In contrast, for cells cultured in control medium, the activation of the above genes barely occurred. In addition, RA with SSC conditions yielded colonies of Acrosin-expressing cells and the positive ratio reached a peak at day 6. Our work thus establishes a simple and cost-efficient approach for male germ like cell differentiation from mouse PSCs and may propose a useful strategy for studying spermatogenesis in vitro.



1996 ◽  
Vol 271 (41) ◽  
pp. 25524-25532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Panariello ◽  
Loredana Quadro ◽  
Sergio Trematerra ◽  
Vittorio Colantuoni


1994 ◽  
Vol 269 (24) ◽  
pp. 16925-16932
Author(s):  
W.A. Dittman ◽  
S.C. Nelson ◽  
P.K. Greer ◽  
E.T. Horton ◽  
M.L. Palomba ◽  
...  




Haematologica ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Zheng ◽  
A. Seshire ◽  
B. Ruster ◽  
G. Bug ◽  
T. Beissert ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document