scholarly journals Synthesising empirical results to improve predictions of post-wildfire runoff and erosion response

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Shakesby ◽  
John A. Moody ◽  
Deborah A. Martin ◽  
Peter R. Robichaud
Keyword(s):  
Debris Flow ◽  
Rainfall Variability ◽  
Fire Frequency ◽  
Controlling Factors ◽  
Population Pressure ◽  
Human Intervention ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Research Issues ◽  
Related Research ◽  
Flow Formation

Advances in research into wildfire impacts on runoff and erosion have demonstrated increasing complexity of controlling factors and responses, which, combined with changing fire frequency, present challenges for modellers. We convened a conference attended by experts and practitioners in post-wildfire impacts, meteorology and related research, including modelling, to focus on priority research issues. The aim was to improve our understanding of controls and responses and the predictive capabilities of models. This conference led to the eight selected papers in this special issue. They address aspects of the distinctiveness in the controls and responses among wildfire regions, spatiotemporal rainfall variability, infiltration, runoff connectivity, debris flow formation and modelling applications. Here we summarise key findings from these papers and evaluate their contribution to improving understanding and prediction of post-wildfire runoff and erosion under changes in climate, human intervention and population pressure on wildfire-prone areas.

scholarly journals Spatial distribution and controlling factors of snow avalanche and debris flow in Parâng Mountains

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ionela Gavrilă ◽  
Olimpiu Pop ◽  
Csaba Horvath ◽  
Flaviu Meseșan ◽  
Iulian Holobâcă
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Debris Flow ◽  
Controlling Factors ◽  
Snow Avalanche

Reflections on Research in Kinesiology

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Karl M. Newell
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Healthy Lifestyle ◽  
Human Movement ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
New Developments ◽  
Related Research ◽  
Research And Teaching ◽  
Initial Research

This paper provides reflections on the progress to date and current status of research in kinesiology. The accompanying overview articles in this special issue of Kinesiology Review show that the contemporary disciplinary/professional foci of kinesiology remain, by and large, the same as the initial research and teaching structures of 50 years ago, as outlined in the inaugural overviews. Nevertheless, within this prevailing disciplinary/professional structure, there have been many new developments in movement-related research, including the juxtaposition of novel alignments and integrations of certain specializations of kinesiology. There is general consensus that the quality and quantity of research in kinesiology have advanced substantially, albeit unevenly, on multiple fronts, both within and between the areas of specialization. The research agenda in kinesiology has benefitted from the growing realization of the centrality of human movement and physical activity in contributing to a healthy lifestyle for individuals and societies.

The evolution of the stakeholder-inclusive approach in the King Reports

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-146
Author(s):  
Annamarie van der Merwe
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Human Intervention ◽  
Common Theme ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Corporate Governance Code ◽  
Inclusive Approach ◽  
High Level

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide the reader with a high-level overview of the key messages of each of the four King Reports on Corporate Governance for South Africa, published during the period from 1994 to 2017, with a particular focus on the stakeholder-inclusive approach. While confirming the constant themes and messages, it also highlights the unique features and attributes of each of these reports. Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on a review and comparison of the four King Reports of Corporate Governance for South Africa with a particular focus on the stakeholder-inclusive approach. Findings The key findings of this paper are: the concept of “stakeholder inclusivity” is a common theme across all four the King Reports forming part of the review while, at the same time, having a unique flavour in each of the reports and visibly developing over the years. The reliance on human intervention and ethical leaders to appropriately and effectively steer the stakeholder-inclusive approach is obvious. In the absence of this, no corporate governance code will provide adequate safeguards to stakeholders against corporate failures and disasters, whether in South Africa or anywhere else. Originality/value This paper is a part of a special issue which looks at the contribution of the King Reports to governance globally.

Advanced perspectives on financialised urban infrastructures

Urban Studies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 1477-1484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Whiteside
Keyword(s):  
Urban Infrastructure ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Social Infrastructure ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Related Research ◽  
Analysis Of Alternatives ◽  
Individual Article ◽  
Operational Phase ◽  
Multiple Actors

This Special Issue attempts to clarify how urban infrastructure is being funded, financed and governed. In this commentary, I seek to engage the topic of the Special Issue as a whole – infrastructure financialisation and its governance – albeit through examples provided by individual article contributions. It is a collection emphasising the tangled interaction between public and private, urging a view of financialisation beyond the binary states vs. markets, and highlighting the multiple actors with multiple agendas at play. The articles provide richly detailed accounts of how the local state remains active, participatory and deeply – if not daily – involved in infrastructure financialisation, even/especially when finance is at its most influential. Not without its limitations, three occlusions in this Special Issue present opportunities for future research, namely the need to: i) extend critical analyses of financialisation; ii) enhance related research on social infrastructure, operational phase processes and treatment of the global South; and iii) advance academic analysis of alternatives to infrastructure financialisation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document