scholarly journals Multiple component networks support working memory in prefrontal cortex

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (35) ◽  
pp. 11084-11089 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Markowitz ◽  
Clayton E. Curtis ◽  
Bijan Pesaran

Lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) is regarded as the hub of the brain’s working memory (WM) system, but it remains unclear whether WM is supported by a single distributed network or multiple specialized network components in this region. To investigate this problem, we recorded from neurons in PFC while monkeys made delayed eye movements guided by memory or vision. We show that neuronal responses during these tasks map to three anatomically specific modes of persistent activity. The first two modes encode early and late forms of information storage, whereas the third mode encodes response preparation. Neurons that reflect these modes are concentrated at different anatomical locations in PFC and exhibit distinct patterns of coordinated firing rates and spike timing during WM, consistent with distinct networks. These findings support multiple component models of WM and consequently predict distinct failures that could contribute to neurologic dysfunction.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sihai Li ◽  
Christos Constantinidis ◽  
Xue-Lian Qi

ABSTRACTThe dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays a critical role in spatial working memory and its activity predicts behavioral responses in delayed response tasks. Here we addressed whether this predictive ability extends to categorical judgments based on information retained in working memory, and is present in other brain areas. We trained monkeys in a novel, Match-Stay, Nonmatch-Go task, which required them to observe two stimuli presented in sequence with an intervening delay period between them. If the two stimuli were different, the monkeys had to saccade to the location of the second stimulus; if they were the same, they held fixation. Neurophysiological recordings were performed in areas 8a and 46 of the dlPFC and 7a and lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) of the PPC. We hypothesized that random drifts causing the peak activity of the network to move away from the first stimulus location and towards the location of the second stimulus would result in categorical errors. Indeed, for both areas, when the first stimulus appeared in a neuron’s preferred location, the neuron showed significantly higher firing rates in correct than in error trials. When the first stimulus appeared at a nonpreferred location and the second stimulus at a preferred, activity in error trials was higher than in correct. The results indicate that the activity of both dlPFC and PPC neurons is predictive of categorical judgments of information maintained in working memory, and the magnitude of neuronal firing rate deviations is revealing of the contents of working memory as it determines performance.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe neural basis of working memory and the areas mediating this function is a topic of controversy. Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex has traditionally been thought to be the neural correlate of working memory, however recent studies have proposed alternative mechanisms and brain areas. Here we show that persistent activity in both the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex predicts behavior in a working memory task that requires a categorical judgement. Our results offer support to the idea that a network of neurons in both areas act as an attractor network that maintains information in working memory, which informs behavior.


Neuron ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan J. Couey ◽  
Rhiannon M. Meredith ◽  
Sabine Spijker ◽  
Rogier B. Poorthuis ◽  
August B. Smit ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 1728-1743 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Gregory Ashby ◽  
Shawn W. Ell ◽  
Vivian V. Valentin ◽  
Michael B. Casale

Many studies suggest that the sustained activation underlying working memory (WM) maintenance is mediated by a distributed network that includes the prefrontal cortex and other structures (e.g., posterior parietal cortex, thalamus, globus pallidus, and the caudate nucleus). A computational model of WM, called FROST (short for FROntal-Striatal-Thalamic), is proposed in which the representation of items and spatial positions is encoded in the lateral prefrontal cortex. During delay intervals, activation in these prefrontal cells is sustained via parallel, prefrontal cortical-thalamic loops. Activation reverberates in these loops because prefrontal cortical excitation of the head of the caudate nucleus leads to disinhibition of the thalamus (via the globus pallidus). FROST successfully accounts for a wide variety of WM data, including single-cell recording data and human behavioral data.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Gomez

In this research we explore in detail how a phenomenon called sustained persistent activity is achieved by circuits of interconnected neurons. Persistent activity is a phenomenon that has been extensively studied (Papoutsi et al. 2013; Kaminski et. al. 2017; McCormick et al. 2003; Rahman, and Berger, 2011). Persistent activity consists in neuron circuits whose spiking activity remains even after the initial stimuli are removed. Persistent activity has been found in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and has been correlated to working memory and decision making (Clayton E. Curtis and Daeyeol Lee, 2010). We go beyond the explanation of how persistent activity happens and show how arrangements of those basic circuits encode and store data and are used to perform more elaborated tasks and computations. The purpose of the model we propose here is to describe the minimum number of neurons and their interconnections required to explain persistent activity and how this phenomenon is actually a fast storage mechanism required for implementing working memory, task processing and decision making.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 1016-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joao Barbosa ◽  
Heike Stein ◽  
Rebecca L. Martinez ◽  
Adrià Galan-Gadea ◽  
Sihai Li ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiu-Sheng Huang ◽  
Hui Wei

Working memory is closely involved in various cognitive activities, but its neural mechanism is still under exploration. The mainstream view has long been that persistent activity is the neural basis of working memory, but recent experiments have observed that activity-silent memory can also be correctly recalled. The underlying mechanism of activity-silent memory is considered to be an alternative scheme that rejects the theory of persistent activity. We propose a working memory model based on spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). Different from models based on spike-rate coding, our model adopts temporal patterns of action potentials to represent information, so it can flexibly encode new memory representation. The model can work in both persistent and silent states, i.e., it is compatible with both of these seemingly conflicting neural mechanisms. We conducted a simulation experiment, and the results are similar to the real experimental results, which suggests that our model is plausible in biology.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Hass ◽  
Salva Ardid ◽  
Jason Sherfey ◽  
Nancy Kopell

AbstractPersistent activity, the maintenance of neural activation over short periods of time in cortical networks, is widely thought to underlie the cognitive function of working memory. A large body of modeling studies has reproduced this kind of activity using cell assemblies with strengthened synaptic connections. However, almost all of these studies have considered persistent activity within networks with homogeneous neurons and synapses, making it difficult to judge the validity of such model results for cortical dynamics, which is based on highly heterogeneous neurons. Here, we consider persistent activity in a detailed, strongly data-driven network model of the prefrontal cortex with heterogeneous neuron and synapse parameters. Surprisingly, persistent activity could not be reproduced in this model without incorporating further constraints. We identified three factors that prevent successful persistent activity: heterogeneity in the cell parameters of interneurons, heterogeneity in the parameters of short-term synaptic plasticity and heterogeneity in the synaptic weights. Our model predicts that persistent activity is recovered if the heterogeneity in the activity of individual interneurons is diminished, which could be achieved by a homeostatic plasticity mechanism. Such a plasticity scheme could also compensate the heterogeneities in the synaptic weights and short-term plasticity when applied to the inhibitory synapses. Cell assemblies shaped in this way may be potentially targeted by distinct inputs or become more responsive to specific tuning or spectral properties. Furthermore, the model predicts that a network that exhibits persistent activity is not able to dynamically produce intrinsic in vivo-like irregular activity at the same time, because heterogeneous synaptic connections are required for these dynamics. Thus, the background noise in such a network must either be produced by external input or constitutes an entirely different state of the network, which is brought about, e.g., by neuromodulation.Author summaryTo operate effectively in a constantly changing world, it is crucial to keep relevant information in mind for short periods of time. This ability, called working memory, is commonly assumed to rest on reverberating activity among members of cell assemblies. While effective in reproducing key results of working memory, most cell assembly models rest on major simplifications such as using the same parameters for all neurons and synapses, i.e., assuming homogeneity in these parameters. Here, we show that this homogeneity assumption is necessary for persistent activity to arise, specifically for inhibitory interneurons and synapses. Using a strongly data-driven network model of the prefrontal cortex, we show that the heterogeneities in the above parameters that are implied by in vitro studies prevent persistent activity. When homogeneity is imposed on inhibitory neurons and synapses, persistent activity is recovered. We propose that the homogeneity constraints can be implemented in the brain by means of homeostatic plasticity, a form of learning that keeps the activity of a network in a constant, homeostatic state. The model makes a number of predictions for biological networks, including a structural separation of networks responsible for generating persistent activity and spontaneous, noise-like activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document