scholarly journals Physiological role of the 3′IgH CBEs super-anchor in antibody class switching

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. e2024392118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuefei Zhang ◽  
Hye Suk Yoon ◽  
Aimee M. Chapdelaine-Williams ◽  
Nia Kyritsis ◽  
Frederick W. Alt
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Physiological Role ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Chromatin Loop ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Class Switch ◽  
Germline Transcription ◽  
Antibody Class

IgH class switch recombination (CSR) replaces Cμ constant region (CH) exons with one of six downstream CHs by joining transcription-targeted double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the Cμ switch (S) region to DSBs in a downstream S region. Chromatin loop extrusion underlies fundamental CSR mechanisms including 3′IgH regulatory region (3′IgHRR)-mediated S region transcription, CSR center formation, and deletional CSR joining. There are 10 consecutive CTCF-binding elements (CBEs) downstream of the 3′IgHRR, termed the “3′IgH CBEs.” Prior studies showed that deletion of eight 3′IgH CBEs did not detectably affect CSR. Here, we report that deletion of all 3′IgH CBEs impacts, to varying degrees, germline transcription and CSR of upstream S regions, except that of Sγ1. Moreover, deletion of all 3′IgH CBEs rendered the 6-kb region just downstream highly transcribed and caused sequences within to be aligned with Sμ, broken, and joined to form aberrant CSR rearrangements. These findings implicate the 3′IgH CBEs as critical insulators for focusing loop extrusion-mediated 3′IgHRR transcriptional and CSR activities on upstream CH locus targets.

scholarly journals Physiological role of the 3’IgH CBEs super-anchor in antibody class switching

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuefei Zhang ◽  
Hye Suk Yoon ◽  
Aimee M. Chapdelaine-Williams ◽  
Nia Kyritsis ◽  
Frederick W. Alt
Keyword(s):  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Class Switch Recombination ◽  
Physiological Role ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Antibody Isotype ◽  
Class Switch ◽  
Igh Locus ◽  
Antibody Class

ABSTRACTIgH class switch recombination (CSR) replaces Cμ constant region (CH) exons with one of six downstream CHS by joining transcription-targeted DSBs in the Cμ switch (S) region to DSBs in a downstream S region. Chromatin loop extrusion underlies fundamental CSR mechanisms including 3’IgH regulatory region (3’IgHRR)-mediated S region transcription, CSR center formation, and deletional CSR joining. There are ten consecutive CTCF binding elements (CBEs) downstream of the 3’IgHRR, termed the “3’IgH CBEs”. Prior studies showed that deletion of eight 3’IgH CBEs did not detectably affect CSR. Here, we report that deletion of all 3’IgH CBEs impacts, to varying degrees, germline transcription and CSR of upstream S regions, except Sγ1. Moreover, deletion of all 3’IgH CBEs rendered the 6kb region just downstream highly transcribed and caused sequences within to be aligned with Sμ, broken, and joined to form aberrant CSR rearrangements. These findings implicate the 3’IgH CBEs as a critical insulator for focusing loop extrusion-mediated 3’IgHRR transcriptional and CSR activities on upstream CH locus targets.SignificanceB lymphocytes change antibody heavy chain (IgH) isotypes by a recombination/deletion process called IgH class switch recombination (CSR). CSR involves introduction of DNA breaks into a donor switch (S) region and also into one of six downstream S regions, with joining of the breaks changing antibody isotype. A chromatin super-anchor, of unknown function, is located just downstream of the IgH locus. We show that complete deletion of this super-anchor variably decreases CSR to most S regions and creates an ectopic S region downstream of IgH locus that undergoes aberrant CSR-driven chromosomal rearrangements. Based on these and other findings, we conclude that the super-anchor downstream of IgH is a critical insulator for focusing potentially dangerous CSR rearrangements to the IgH locus.

scholarly journals Parp3 promotes long-range end-joining in murine cells

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob V. Layer ◽  
J. Patrick Cleary ◽  
Alexander J. Brown ◽  
Kristen E. Stevenson ◽  
Sara N. Morrow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Class Switch

AbstractChromosomal rearrangements, including translocations, are early and essential events in the formation of many tumors. Previous studies that defined the genetic requirements for rearrangement formation have identified differences between murine and human cells, most notably in the role of classical‐ and alternative-nonhomologous end joining factors (NHEJ). We reported that poly(ADP)ribose polymerase 3 (PARP3) promotes chromosomal rearrangements induced by endonucleases in multiple human cell types. In contrast to c-NHEJ factors, we show here that Parp3 also promotes rearrangements in murine cells, including translocations in murine embryonic stem cells (mESCs), class switch recombination in primary B cells and inversions in tail fibroblasts that generate Eml4-Alk fusions. In mESCs, Parp3-deficient cells had shorter deletion lengths at translocation junctions. This was corroborated using next-generation sequencing of Eml4-Alk junctions in tail fibroblasts and is consistent with a role for Parp3 in promoting the processing of DNA double-strand breaks. We confirmed a previous report that Parp1 also promotes rearrangement formation. In contrast with Parp3, rearrangement junctions in the absence of Parp1 had longer deletion lengths, suggesting Parp1 may suppress DSB processing. Together, these data indicate that Parp3 and Parp1 promote rearrangements with distinct phenotypes.

scholarly journals Genetic Separation of Sae2 Nuclease Activity from Mre11 Nuclease Functions in Budding Yeast

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sucheta Arora ◽  
Rajashree A. Deshpande ◽  
Martin Budd ◽  
Judy Campbell ◽  
America Revere ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclease Activity ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Endonuclease Activity ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Ends

ABSTRACT Sae2 promotes the repair of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The role of Sae2 is linked to the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 (MRX) complex, which is important for the processing of DNA ends into single-stranded substrates for homologous recombination. Sae2 has intrinsic endonuclease activity, but the role of this activity has not been assessed independently from its functions in promoting Mre11 nuclease activity. Here we identify and characterize separation-of-function mutants that lack intrinsic nuclease activity or the ability to promote Mre11 endonucleolytic activity. We find that the ability of Sae2 to promote MRX nuclease functions is important for DNA damage survival, particularly in the absence of Dna2 nuclease activity. In contrast, Sae2 nuclease activity is essential for DNA repair when the Mre11 nuclease is compromised. Resection of DNA breaks is impaired when either Sae2 activity is blocked, suggesting roles for both Mre11 and Sae2 nuclease activities in promoting the processing of DNA ends in vivo. Finally, both activities of Sae2 are important for sporulation, indicating that the processing of meiotic breaks requires both Mre11 and Sae2 nuclease activities.

scholarly journals TOPOVIBL-REC114 interaction regulates meiotic DNA double-strand breaks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Nore ◽  
Ariadna B Juarez-Martinez ◽  
Julie AJ Clement ◽  
Christine Brun ◽  
Bouboub Diagouraga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Cleavage ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Catalytic Complex ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Dna Cleavage Activity ◽  
Meiotic Dsbs

Meiosis requires the formation of programmed DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), essential for fertility and for generating genetic diversity. In male and female meiotic cells, DSBs are induced by the catalytic activity of the TOPOVIL complex formed by SPO11 and TOPOVIBL. To ensure genomic integrity, DNA cleavage activity is tightly regulated, and several accessory factors (REC114, MEI4, IHO1, and MEI1) are needed for DSB formation in mice. How and when these proteins act is not understood. Here, we show that REC114 is a direct partner of TOPOVIBL, and identified their conserved interacting domains by structural analysis. We then analysed the role of this interaction by monitoring meiotic DSBs in female and male mice carrying point mutations in TOPOVIBL that decrease or disrupt its binding to REC114. In these mutants, DSB activity was strongly reduced genome-wide in oocytes, but only in sub-telomeric regions in spermatocytes. In addition, in mutant spermatocytes, DSB activity was delayed in autosomes. These results provide evidence that REC114 is a key member of the TOPOVIL catalytic complex, and that the REC114/TOPOVIBL interaction ensures the efficiency and timing of DSB activity by integrating specific chromosomal features.

scholarly journals CTCF cooperates with CtIP to drive homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (17) ◽  
pp. 9160-9179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soon Young Hwang ◽  
Mi Ae Kang ◽  
Chul Joon Baik ◽  
Yejin Lee ◽  
Ngo Thanh Hang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Control Point ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
End Resection

Abstract The pleiotropic CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) plays a role in homologous recombination (HR) repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). However, the precise mechanistic role of CTCF in HR remains largely unclear. Here, we show that CTCF engages in DNA end resection, which is the initial, crucial step in HR, through its interactions with MRE11 and CtIP. Depletion of CTCF profoundly impairs HR and attenuates CtIP recruitment at DSBs. CTCF physically interacts with MRE11 and CtIP and promotes CtIP recruitment to sites of DNA damage. Subsequently, CTCF facilitates DNA end resection to allow HR, in conjunction with MRE11–CtIP. Notably, the zinc finger domain of CTCF binds to both MRE11 and CtIP and enables proficient CtIP recruitment, DNA end resection and HR. The N-terminus of CTCF is able to bind to only MRE11 and its C-terminus is incapable of binding to MRE11 and CtIP, thereby resulting in compromised CtIP recruitment, DSB resection and HR. Overall, this suggests an important function of CTCF in DNA end resection through the recruitment of CtIP at DSBs. Collectively, our findings identify a critical role of CTCF at the first control point in selecting the HR repair pathway.

scholarly journals CDK and Mec1/Tel1-catalyzed phosphorylation of Sae2 regulate different responses to DNA damage

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (21) ◽  
pp. 11238-11249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tai-Yuan Yu ◽  
Valerie E Garcia ◽  
Lorraine S Symington
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Physiological Role ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Checkpoint Kinases ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
End Resection

Abstract Sae2 functions in the DNA damage response by controlling Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX)-catalyzed end resection, an essential step for homology-dependent repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs), and by attenuating DNA damage checkpoint signaling. Phosphorylation of Sae2 by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK1/Cdc28) activates the Mre11 endonuclease, while the physiological role of Sae2 phosphorylation by Mec1 and Tel1 checkpoint kinases is not fully understood. Here, we compare the phenotype of sae2 mutants lacking the main CDK (sae2-S267A) or Mec1 and Tel1 phosphorylation sites (sae2-5A) with sae2Δ and Mre11 nuclease defective (mre11-nd) mutants. The phosphorylation-site mutations confer DNA damage sensitivity, but not to the same extent as sae2Δ. The sae2-S267A mutation is epistatic to mre11-nd for camptothecin (CPT) sensitivity and synergizes with sgs1Δ, whereas sae2-5A synergizes with mre11-nd and exhibits epistasis with sgs1Δ. We find that attenuation of checkpoint signaling by Sae2 is mostly independent of Mre11 endonuclease activation but requires Mec1 and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation of Sae2. These results support a model whereby CDK-catalyzed phosphorylation of Sae2 activates resection via Mre11 endonuclease, whereas Sae2 phosphorylation by Mec1 and Tel1 promotes resection by the Dna2-Sgs1 and Exo1 pathways indirectly by dampening the DNA damage response.

scholarly journals Role of yeast SIR genes and mating type in directing DNA double-strand breaks to homologous and non-homologous repair paths

1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (14) ◽  
pp. 767-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Eun Lee ◽  
Frédéric Pâques ◽  
Jason Sylvan ◽  
James E. Haber
Keyword(s):  
Mating Type ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks

scholarly journals The Recombination Genes addAB Are Not Restricted to Gram-Positive Bacteria: Genetic Analysis of the Recombination Initiation Enzymes RecF and AddAB in Rhizobium etli

2004 ◽  
Vol 186 (23) ◽  
pp. 7905-7913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacobo Zuñiga-Castillo ◽  
David Romero ◽  
Jaime M. Martínez-Salazar
Keyword(s):  
Recombination Frequency ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Additive Effect ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Rhizobium Etli ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria

ABSTRACT Single-strand gaps (SSGs) and double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the major initiation sites for recombination. In bacteria, the SSGs are repaired by RecFOR, while the DSBs are processed by RecBCD in gram-negative bacteria and AddAB in gram-positive bacteria. Unexpectedly, instead of recBCD genes, the addAB genes were found in members of the α-proteobacteria group (gram negative). Taking Rhizobium etli as a model, the role of recF and addAB genes in homologous recombination and repair of damaged DNA was evaluated. Inactivation of either recF or addA provoked strong sensitivity to UV radiation and mitomycin C, while an additive effect was observed in the recF-addA mutant. The DSBs generated by nalidixic acid caused low viability only in the addA mutant. The recombination frequency of large and small plasmids was reduced in the recF mutant (24- and 36-fold, respectively), whereas a slight decrease (threefold) in the addA mutant was observed. Moreover, an additive effect (47- and 90-fold, respectively) was observed in the double mutant, but it was not as dramatic as that in a recA mutant. Interestingly, the frequency of deletion and Campbell-type recombination was slightly affected in either single or double mutants. These results suggest that another pathway exists that allows plasmid and Campbell-type recombination in the absence of recF and addA genes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document