scholarly journals A Promoter Recognition Mechanism Common to Yeast Mitochondrial and Phage T7 RNA Polymerases

2009 ◽  
Vol 284 (20) ◽  
pp. 13641-13647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhananjaya Nayak ◽  
Qing Guo ◽  
Rui Sousa
Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria L. Sokolova ◽  
Inna Misovetc ◽  
Konstantin V. Severinov

Prokaryotic viruses with DNA genome longer than 200 kb are collectively referred to as “jumbo phages”. Some representatives of this phylogenetically diverse group encode two DNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RNAPs)—a virion RNAP and a non-virion RNAP. In contrast to most other phage-encoded RNAPs, the jumbo phage RNAPs are multisubunit enzymes related to RNAPs of cellular organisms. Unlike all previously characterized multisubunit enzymes, jumbo phage RNAPs lack the universally conserved alpha subunits required for enzyme assembly. The mechanism of promoter recognition is also different from those used by cellular enzymes. For example, the AR9 phage non-virion RNAP requires uracils in its promoter and is able to initiate promoter-specific transcription from single-stranded DNA. Jumbo phages encoding multisubunit RNAPs likely have a common ancestor allowing making them a separate subgroup within the very diverse group of jumbo phages. In this review, we describe transcriptional strategies used by RNAP-encoding jumbo phages and describe the properties of characterized jumbo phage RNAPs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra-Viola Bohne ◽  
Marlene Teubner ◽  
Karsten Liere ◽  
Andreas Weihe ◽  
Thomas Börner

2017 ◽  
Vol 292 (44) ◽  
pp. 18145-18160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shemaila Sultana ◽  
Mihai Solotchi ◽  
Aparna Ramachandran ◽  
Smita S. Patel

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramesh Padmanabhan ◽  
Dennis Miller

1.1AbstractRNA polymerases (RNAPs) differ from other polymerases in that they can bind promoter sequences and initiate de novo transcription. Promoter recognition requires the presence of specific DNA binding domains in the polymerase. The structure and mechanistic aspects of transcription by the bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase (T7 RNAP) are well characterized. This single subunit RNAP belongs to the family of RNAPs which also includes the T3, SP6 and mitochondrial RNAPs. High specificity for its promoter, the requirement of no additional transcription factors, and high fidelity of initiation from a specific site in the promoter makes it the polymerase of choice to study the mechanistic aspects of transcription. The structure and function of the catalytic domains of this family of polymerases are highly conserved suggesting a common mechanism underlying transcription. Although the two groups of single subunit RNAPs, mitochondrial and bacteriophage, have remarkable structural conservation, they recognize quite dissimilar promoters. Specifically, the bacteriophage promoters recognize a 23 nucleotide promoter extending from −17 to + 6 nucleotides relative to the site of transcription initiation, while the well characterized promoter recognized by the yeast mitochondrial RNAP is nine nucleotides in length extending from −8 to +1 relative to the site of transcription initiation. Promoters recognized by the bacteriophage RNAPs are also well characterized with distinct functional domains involved in promoter recognition and transcription initiation. Thorough mutational studies have been conducted by altering individual base-pairs within these domains. Here we describe experiments to determine whether the prototype bacteriophage RNAP is able to recognize and initiate at truncated promoters similar to mitochondrial promoters. Using an in vitro oligonucleotide transcriptional system, we have assayed transcription initiation activity by T7 RNAP. When a complete or almost complete (20 to 16 nucleotide) double stranded T7 RNAP promoter sequence is present, small RNA’s are produced through template-independent and promoter-dependent stuttering corresponding to abortive initiation, and this effect was lost with a scrambled promoter sequence. When partial double stranded promoter sequences (10 to 12 nucleotides) are supplied, template dependent de novo initiation of RNA occurs at a site different from the canonical +1-initiation site. The site of transcription initiation is determined by a recessed 3’ end based paired to the template strand of DNA rather than relative to the partial promoter sequence. Understanding the mechanism underlying this observation helps us to understand the role of the elements in the T7 promoter, and provides insights into the promoter evolution of the single-subunit RNAPs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 200 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine J. Fenstermacher ◽  
Vasudevan Achuthan ◽  
Thomas D. Schneider ◽  
Jeffrey J. DeStefano

ABSTRACTDNA polymerases (DNAPs) recognize 3′ recessed termini on duplex DNA and carry out nucleotide catalysis. Unlike promoter-specific RNA polymerases (RNAPs), no sequence specificity is required for binding or initiation of catalysis. Despite this, previous results indicate that viral reverse transcriptases bind much more tightly to DNA primers that mimic the polypurine tract. In the current report, primer sequences that bind with high affinity toTaqand Klenow polymerases were identified using a modified systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) approach. TwoTaq-specific primers that bound ∼10 (Taq1) and over 100 (Taq2) times more stably than controls toTaqwere identified. TaqI contained 8 nucleotides (5′-CACTAAAG-3′) that matched the phage T3 RNAP “core” promoter. Both primers dramatically outcompeted primers with similar binding thermodynamics in PCRs. Similarly, exonuclease−Klenow polymerase also selected a high-affinity primer that contained a related core promoter sequence from phage T7 RNAP (5′-ACTATAG-3′). For bothTaqand Klenow, even small modifications to the sequence resulted in large losses in binding affinity, suggesting that binding was highly sequence specific. The results are discussed in the context of possible effects on multiprimer (multiplex) PCR assays, molecular information theory, and the evolution of RNAPs and DNAPs.IMPORTANCEThis work further demonstrates that primer-dependent DNA polymerases can have strong sequence biases leading to dramatically tighter binding to specific sequences. These may be related to biological function or be a consequence of the structural architecture of the enzyme. New sequence specificity forTaqand Klenow polymerases were uncovered, and among them were sequences that contained the core promoter elements from T3 and T7 phage RNA polymerase promoters. This suggests the intriguing possibility that phage RNA polymerases exploited intrinsic binding affinities of ancestral DNA polymerases to develop their promoters. Conversely, DNA polymerases could have evolved from related RNA polymerases and retained the intrinsic binding preference despite there being no clear function for such a preference in DNA biology.


2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 446-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Lin ◽  
Lucy Thorne ◽  
Zhinan Jin ◽  
Loubna A. Hammad ◽  
Serena Li ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (21) ◽  
pp. 6027-6035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Artsimovitch ◽  
Vladimir Svetlov ◽  
Larry Anthony ◽  
Richard R. Burgess ◽  
Robert Landick

ABSTRACT Adaptation of bacterial cells to diverse habitats relies on the ability of RNA polymerase to respond to various regulatory signals. Some of these signals are conserved throughout evolution, whereas others are species specific. In this study we present a comprehensive comparative analysis of RNA polymerases from two distantly related bacterial species, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, using a panel of in vitro transcription assays. We found substantial species-specific differences in the ability of these enzymes to escape from the promoter and to recognize certain types of elongation signals. Both enzymes responded similarly to other pause and termination signals and to the general E. coli elongation factors NusA and GreA. We also demonstrate that, although promoter recognition depends largely on the ς subunit, promoter discrimination exhibited in species-specific fashion by both RNA polymerases resides in the core enzyme. We hypothesize that differences in signal recognition are due to the changes in contacts made between the β and β′ subunits and the downstream DNA duplex.


1989 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 122-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shona Murphy ◽  
Beth Moorefield ◽  
Tomas Pieler

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yashar Sadian ◽  
Florence Baudin ◽  
Lucas Tafur ◽  
Brice Murciano ◽  
Rene Wetzel ◽  
...  

AbstractRNA polymerase I (Pol I) assembles with core factor (CF) and Rrn3 on the rDNA core promoter for transcription initiation. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of closed, intermediate and open Pol I initiation complexes from 2.7 to 3.7 Å resolution to visualize Pol I promoter melting and to structurally and biochemically characterize the recognition mechanism of Pol I promoter DNA. In the closed complex, double-stranded DNA runs outside the DNA-binding cleft. Rotation of CF and upstream DNA with respect to Pol I and Rrn3 results in the spontaneous loading and opening of the promoter followed by cleft closure and positioning of the Pol I A49 tandem winged helix domain (tWH) onto DNA. Conformational rearrangement of A49 tWH leads to a clash with Rrn3 to initiate complex disassembly and promoter escape. Comprehensive insight into the Pol I transcription initiation cycle allows comparisons with promoter opening by Pol II and Pol III.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document