Het Belang Van Taalkunde Voor de Toegepaste Taalkunde

1981 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 246-257
Author(s):  
A.G. Sciarone
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Language ◽  
Language Teaching ◽  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Foreign Language Teaching ◽  
Linguistic Understanding ◽  
Language Courses ◽  
The Difference ◽  
And Linguistics ◽  
Task Division

Applied Linguistics is generally regarded as a multidisciplinary field in which didactics, psychology and linguistics participate. It is remarkable that within the context of foreign language teaching the focus is mainly on the didactic experiment and on the construction of psycholinguistic hypotheses. Yet for a linguistic-didactic experiment to be relevant, insight in what is to be taught, viz. language,is necessary. Many variants of language teaching could have been avoided with a better linguistic insight. Moreover, a better linguistic understanding in applied linguis-tics leads to a better distinction between the views of linguists on language didactics and psycholinguistics and the descriptions of language they give. In this paper the relation between grammar and vocabulary is discussed. It is argued that this distinction is based more on definition than on reality. Stressing the importance of the role of vocabulary does not imply denying or minimising the importance of grammar. On the contrary, the traditional task division in linguistics between grammar and lexicology has led to a sterile grammatical description. Recent tendencies in linguistics now show a more integrated description of grammar and vocabu-lary. Finally, with regard to the didactically important problem of vocabu-lary selection, some remarks are made concerning the difference between selection on the basis of linguistic properties and selection on the basis of usually arbitrary non-linguistic idiosyncrasies of words and the influence of this on teaching material. This is illustrated with examples from language courses.

The role of DO-auxiliary in subject-auxiliary inversion: Developing Langacker’s notion of existential negotiation

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Duffley
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Language ◽  
Cognitive Linguistics ◽  
Language Teaching ◽  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Foreign Language Teaching ◽  
Cognitive Motivation ◽  
Core Elements

AbstractThis paper builds on Langacker’s (in press. How to build an English clause. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics 2(2)) analysis of subject-auxiliary inversion (SAI) as involving “existential negotiation”. Langacker’s account is completed by relating it to full verb inversion (FVI). In FVI, non-core elements are fronted, resulting in inversion without an auxiliary, as in Into the room walked Mary; however, non-core elements are also frontable in SAI, as in Bitterly did we regret our decision. Do is treated as denoting full actualization and SAI is accounted for by focus on an exceptionally intense mode of actualization, whence the use of do to explicitly express what is focused on. The role of into the room in the FVI example is to define a locus into which an entity is introduced. Since this does not involve focus on the fact or manner of the verbal event’s actualization, do is not used. This leads to a different division of inverted structures than that of Chen (2013. Subject auxiliary inversion and linguistic generalization: Evidence for functional/cognitive motivation in language. Cognitive Linguistics 24. 1–32), who distinguishes those that merely reverse subject and auxiliary (argued to denote non-indicative mood) from those where the inverted auxiliary-subject order is accompanied by fronting of a non-subject element (treated as involving focus on the fronted item). It is argued here that fronting do-auxiliary marks focus on the actualization of the verbal event itself.

scholarly journals Applied linguistics

2003 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-225
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Language ◽  
Language Teaching ◽  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Foreign Language Teaching ◽  
Theory Building ◽  
Southern Illinois ◽  
Language Research ◽  
Language And Communication

03–535 Hellermann, John (Southern Illinois U., Carbondale, USA; Email: [email protected]). The interactive use of prosody in the IRF exchange: Teacher repetition in feedback moves. Language in Society (Cambridge, UK), 32, 1 (2003), 79–104.03–536 Wendt, Michael (Universität Bremen, Germany). Kontext und Konstruktion: Fremdsprachendidaktische theoriebildung und ihre Implikationen für die Fremdsprachenforschung. [Context and construction: Theory building in foreign language teaching and its implications for foreign language research.] Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung (Berlin, Germany), 13, 1 (2002), 1–62.03–537 Weppelman, Tammy, L., Bostow, Angela, Schiffer, Ryan, Elbert-Perez, Evelyn and Newman, Rochelle, S. (U. of Iowa, USA). Children's use of the prosodic characteristics of infant-directed speech. Language and Communication (Oxford, UK), 23, 1 (2003), 63–80.

scholarly journals Ensino de língua estrangeira: os métodos

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-265
Author(s):  
Milena Meira Ramos dos Santos
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Language ◽  
Language Teaching ◽  
Teaching Experience ◽  
Foreign Language Teaching ◽  
Learning Assessment ◽  
Teaching Methodologies ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Over Time

Language teaching methodologies have changed/improved over the years to meet the needs of teachers and students in the classroom. In this paper we aim to present the evolution of foreign language teaching through a description of language teaching methodologies over time. We describe the principles underlying some methodologies, the role of teacher and student, and how learning assessment is done. Authors such as Richards and Rodgers (1991), Almeida Filho (1999), Silva (2004), Pérez (2007), among others, were some of the academic experts on which we relied to conduct this study. We conclude that methods should work as a reference for the teacher, and should be adapted to each particular situation or context in which they live. Therefore, the teachers should use the methodologies that reflect their principles, reducing the distance between the theory developed by language experts and the teaching experience.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document