Linaria vulgaris Miller, yellow toadflax (Scrophulariaceae).

Author(s):  
A. S. McClay ◽  
R. A. de Clerck-Floate
2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-283
Author(s):  
Travis L. Almquist ◽  
Katie L. Wirt ◽  
Jason W. Adams ◽  
Rodney G. Lym

AbstractYellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris P. Mill.) infestations in North Dakota increased 300-fold from 1997 to 2011, when the plant was added to the state noxious weed list. Long-term control of other invasive species had included biological control agents, but no effective agents for yellow toadflax had been identified, so a control program using herbicides was needed. The objective was to shift from short-term control with picloram applied in the fall at maximum allowed rates to long-term management with minimal nontarget species impact with an adaptive management approach. Yellow toadflax control was increased from an average of 64% with picloram at 1,120 g ha−1 alone 12 mo after treatment (MAT) to over 90% when applied with diflufenzopyr while the picloram rate was reduced 50%. Yellow toadflax control with aminocyclopyrachlor applied at 140 g ha−1 ranged from 91 to 49% 12 MAT when applied in June or September, respectively. In contrast, yellow toadflax control with picloram plus dicamba plus diflufenzopyr averaged > 90% regardless of application date during the growing season. Land managers now have at least two options for long-term yellow toadflax control with a wide window of application timing. The goal of replacing a single high-use–rate herbicide treatment was met but both picloram and aminocyclopyrachlor can injure many desirable forbs. However, application timing can now be adjusted to have the least impact on nontarget species. The adaptive development program led to a 58% reduction in yellow toadflax infestations in North Dakota by 2014.


2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik A. Lehnhoff ◽  
Lisa J. Rew ◽  
Bruce D. Maxwell ◽  
Mark L. Taper

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 777-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirza N. Baig ◽  
A. Lloyd Darwent ◽  
K. Neil Harker ◽  
John T. O'Donovan

The effectiveness of preharvest applications of glyphosate on yellow toadflax was evaluated at five sites in Alberta from 1992 to 1994. At each site, glyphosate at 0.9 to 1.8 kg ae/ha was applied with or without nonionic surfactant and/or ammonium sulfate. Glyphosate at 2.7 kg/ha and glufosinate at 0.6 kg ai/ha were applied without additional adjuvants. The treatments were applied 7 to 10 d before crop harvest, when the majority of the yellow toadflax was in a flowering stage. Eleven to 12 mo after glyphosate application, yellow toadflax density was reduced by more than 80%. In most instances, there was no advantage in increasing the glyphosate rate above 0.9 kg/ha. The addition of nonionic surfactant and/or ammonium sulfate did not enhance glyphosate activity. Glufosinate did not control yellow toadflax in the year following treatment. Barley, canola, and flax yields in the year following applications were significantly higher in all preharvest glyphosate-treated plots than in untreated plots.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-140
Author(s):  
R. D. Johnson ◽  
T. W. Grovenburg ◽  
L. B. Perkins ◽  
J. A. Jenks ◽  
W. M. Inselman ◽  
...  

1963 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. Coupland ◽  
S. Zilke ◽  
G. W. Selleck

During 1949–57, surveys and resurveys were conducted throughout one-third of the settled area of Saskatchewan for the purpose of ascertaining the abundance of several species of introduced persistent perennial weeds and to evaluate their rates of increase. The methods used included an extensive farm-to-farm survey, sampling quarter-sections along transects in heavily infested areas, and resurveys of the same land at intervals. Detailed studies along line transects in various habitats were used during 1954–61 to obtain more precise data concerning increases and decreases in extent of infestations. These studies indicated that, within the area surveyed, 142,702 acres were infested with toadflax (Linaria vulgaris Mill.) in 4,993 quarter-sections. The increase in abundance of the weed was particularly great from 1949 to 1954, while after that date uncultivated infestations spread much less rapidly and cultivated ones were kept under fairly good control. The data indicate that the weed probably responds to weather conditions in such a way as to be favored relative to grasses by deficiency of soil moisture in the upper levels of the soil.


2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 582-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Ma ◽  
Naoko Higashi ◽  
Kyoko Ishiguro ◽  
Ying Zhao ◽  
Linkui Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document