Use of criterion-based clinical audit to improve the quality of obstetric care: A systematic review

2009 ◽  
Vol 88 (8) ◽  
pp. 873-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene Justine Kongnyuy ◽  
Olalekan Abulrahman Uthman
BMJ ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 286 (6365) ◽  
pp. 621-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Clarke ◽  
D G Clayton

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Áine Brislane ◽  
Fionnuala Larkin ◽  
Helen Jones ◽  
Margie H. Davenport

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, obstetric care has adopted new precautions to ensure services can be maintained for pregnant women. The aim of this study was to describe access to and quality of obstetric care for pregnant and postpartum women during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify factors that predict quality of care at this time.Methods: Between May 3 and June 28, 2020, we recruited women who were pregnant or within the first 6 months after delivery to participate in an online survey. This included questions on access to obstetric healthcare (type and place of health care provider, changes to obstetric appointments/services, appointment preferences) and the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ).Results: Of the 917 eligible women, 612 (67%) were pregnant and 305 (33%) were in the first 6 months after delivery. Sixty-two percent (n = 571) reported that COVID-19 had affected their healthcare; appointments were rearranged, canceled or occurred via virtual means for 29% (n = 166), 29% (n = 167), and 31% (n = 175) of women, respectively. The majority preferred to physically attend appointments (74%; n = 676) and perceived the accompaniment of birth partners as important (77%; n = 471). Sixty-two percent (n = 380) were permitted a birth partner at delivery, 18% (n = 111) were unsure of the rules while 4% (n = 26) were not permitted accompaniment. During pregnancy, QPCQ was negatively associated with disruption to obstetric services including exclusion or uncertainty regarding birth partner permissions [F(7, 433) = 11.5, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.16] while QPCQ was negatively associated with inadequate breastfeeding support postpartum [F(1, 147) = 12.05, p = 0.001, R2 = 0.08].Conclusion: Pregnant and postpartum have experienced disruption in their access to obstetric healthcare. Perceived quality of obstetric care was negatively influenced by cancellation of appointment(s), suspension of services and exclusion of birth partners at delivery. During this time, continuity of care can be fulfilled via virtual and/or phone appointments and women should receive clear guidance on changes to services including birth partner permissions to attend delivery.


Author(s):  
Elsa RODRÍGUEZ-ANGULO ◽  
Marita SOLÍS-RIVERO ◽  
Ricardo OJEDA-RODRÍGUEZ ◽  
Guadalupe ANDUEZA-PECH

Objectives. Identify the barriers that cause delays in the route of obstetric care in pregnant women of Yaxkukul, Yucatán, from January 2016 to May 2018. Methodology. Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective study. Pregnant women who attended prenatal control at the rural health center of Yaxkukul were interviewed and reviewed their clinical record. Sociodemographic characteristics, prenatal control were studied and the critical route of obstetric care was described, under the model of the three delays. Percentages, measures of central tendency and dispersion were calculated; as well as square chi to look for association between delays and maternal morbidity. A 95% confidence level and a value of p <0.05 were used. Contribution. The present study contributes to the prevention of maternal and perinatal mortality. Knowing the barriers that cause delays in care can identify deficiencies in the obstetric emergency protocol established in rural health units, to improve the quality of obstetric care.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katy B. Kozhimannil ◽  
Peiyin Hung ◽  
Shailendra Prasad ◽  
Michelle Casey ◽  
Maeve McClellan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-126
Author(s):  
Rizki Amalia ◽  
Moch. Hakimi ◽  
Herlin Fitriani

Evidence-based is a very effective strategy to improve the quality of midwifery services. One of the most frequently problems faced is the gap between midwifery practices that are in accordance with the procedures (based on evidence-based) with clinical care practices that occur in the clinic. The purpose of this study was to explore in-depth the obstacles to the implementation of evidence-based normal childbirth, which are the position of delivery, monitoring and documenting delivery by using partographs in the Independent Practice of Midwives of Gunungkidul District, Yogyakarta.This research was a qualitative research with a phenomenological descriptive approach. The participants of this study were midwives who had the Independent Midwife Practice (PMB) consisting of 7 informants. Participant selection in this study used a purposive sampling technique with convenience sampling and identification of obstacles used was the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Data collection used was semi-structured interviews and observations. Data analysis used was a thematic analysis.The interview and observation of delivery assistance is done at the Independent Midwife Practice Center (PMB). The position of delivery that was often used by patients was lithotomy and left slant, and the application of evidence-based monitoring and documentation using partograph was still not optimal. This was because there were several obstacles in its application, which were obstacles from patients, families, midwives, and obstacles from the organization. The impact of these obstacles was that it can reduce the quality of obstetric care in patients according to evidence-based. The evaluation of clinical practice based on evidence-based by the organization and the existence of feedback from patients to midwives are expected to improve the quality of service to patients.    


2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 44-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meriam El Ghardallou ◽  
Thouraya Nabli Ajmi ◽  
Afef Mkhazni ◽  
Chekib Zedini ◽  
Sawssen Meddeb ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document