scholarly journals Barreras en la atención de la morbilidad materna en Yaxkukul, Yucatán, México

2019 ◽  
pp. 28-37
Author(s):  
Elsa RODRÍGUEZ-ANGULO ◽  
Marita SOLÍS-RIVERO ◽  
Ricardo OJEDA-RODRÍGUEZ ◽  
Guadalupe ANDUEZA-PECH
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Rural Health ◽  
Obstetric Care ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Obstetric Emergency ◽  
A Value ◽  
Rural Health Center ◽  
Quality Of Obstetric Care ◽  
Three Delays

Objectives. Identify the barriers that cause delays in the route of obstetric care in pregnant women of Yaxkukul, Yucatán, from January 2016 to May 2018. Methodology. Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective study. Pregnant women who attended prenatal control at the rural health center of Yaxkukul were interviewed and reviewed their clinical record. Sociodemographic characteristics, prenatal control were studied and the critical route of obstetric care was described, under the model of the three delays. Percentages, measures of central tendency and dispersion were calculated; as well as square chi to look for association between delays and maternal morbidity. A 95% confidence level and a value of p <0.05 were used. Contribution. The present study contributes to the prevention of maternal and perinatal mortality. Knowing the barriers that cause delays in care can identify deficiencies in the obstetric emergency protocol established in rural health units, to improve the quality of obstetric care.

scholarly journals Determinants of perceived quality of obstetric care in rural Tanzania: a cross-sectional study

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elysia Larson ◽  
Sabrina Hermosilla ◽  
Angela Kimweri ◽  
Godfrey M Mbaruku ◽  
Margaret E Kruk
Keyword(s):  
Obstetric Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Perceived Quality ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Rural Tanzania ◽  
Quality Of Obstetric Care

scholarly journals Health-related quality of life in different trimesters during pregnancy

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huailiang Wu ◽  
Weiwei Sun ◽  
Hanqing Chen ◽  
Yanxin Wu ◽  
Wenjing Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Abstract Background Pregnant women experience physical, physiological, and mental changes. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a relevant indicator of psychological and physical behaviours, changing over the course of pregnancy. This study aims to assess HRQoL of pregnant women during different stages of pregnancy. Methods This cross-sectional study was performed using the The EuroQoL Group’s five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) to assess the HRQoL of pregnant women, and demographic data were collected. This study was conducted in a regional university hospital in Guangzhou, China. Results A total of 908 pregnant women were included in this study. Pregnant women in the early 2nd trimester had the highest HRQoL. The HRQoL of pregnant women rose from the 1st trimester to the early 2nd trimester, and dropped to the bottom at the late 3rd trimester due to some physical and mental changes. Reports of pain/discomfort problem were the most common (46.0%) while self-care were the least concern. More than 10% of pregnant women in the 1st trimester had health-related problems in at least one dimension of whole five dimensions. In the whole sample, the EuroQoL Group’s visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) was 87.86 ± 9.16. Across the gestational stages, the HRQoL remained stable during the pregnancy but the highest value was observed in the 1st trimester (89.65 ± 10.13) while the lowest was in the late 3rd trimester (87.28 ± 9.13). Conclusions During pregnancy, HRQoL were associated with gestational trimesters in a certain degree. HRQoL was the highest in the early 2nd trimester and then decreased to the lowest in the late 3rd trimester due to a series of physical and psychological changes. Therefore, obstetric doctors and medical institutions should give more attention and care to pregnant women in the late 3rd trimester.

scholarly journals Quality of obstetric care provided for Asian immigrants in Leicestershire.

BMJ ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 286 (6365) ◽  
pp. 621-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Clarke ◽  
D G Clayton
Keyword(s):  
Obstetric Care ◽  
Asian Immigrants ◽  
Quality Of Obstetric Care

scholarly journals Coping Strategies and Health-Related Quality of Life in Pregnant Women with SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 1113
Author(s):  
Madalina Timircan ◽  
Felix Bratosin ◽  
Iulia Vidican ◽  
Oana Suciu ◽  
Mirela Turaiche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Physical Burden

Background and Objectives: As maternal deaths associated with the SARS-CoV-2 infection remain at several times greater than the general population, significant factors that might contribute to the higher mortality and morbidity rate are the psychological impact of the disease and pregnancy itself. Therefore, the current study’s main objective was to assess how pregnant women react and cope with the stress of COVID-19 disease and how it influences their overall health and quality of life in healthcare facilities. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we included 304 pregnant women who successfully completed standardized forms to assess our topics of interest, comprising of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Short Form Health Survey-12, the Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory scale, the CORE-Outcome Measure Questionnaire, and the Quality from the Patient’s Perspective questionnaire. Results: Unemployed, pregnant women living in poverty in the rural areas had higher SARS-CoV-2 infection rates during pregnancy. They faced higher anxiety levels and depression rates, with associated increased physical burden and exhaustion. However, these findings are not influenced by hospital care since it remained unchanged among COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 maternity units, excepting significantly lower technical competence scores of COVID-19 facilities. Conclusions: As the pandemic’s consequences emerge and additional outbreaks occur, care must prioritize the additional physical burden experienced by pregnant women who have contracted COVID-19, as well as psychological, emotional, and mental health support.

scholarly journals Access to and Quality of Healthcare for Pregnant and Postpartum Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Áine Brislane ◽  
Fionnuala Larkin ◽  
Helen Jones ◽  
Margie H. Davenport
Keyword(s):  
Online Survey ◽  
Obstetric Care ◽  
Quality Of Healthcare ◽  
Postpartum Women ◽  
Breastfeeding Support ◽  
Negatively Associated ◽  
Quality Of Obstetric Care ◽  
Obstetric Services ◽  
Inadequate Breastfeeding

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, obstetric care has adopted new precautions to ensure services can be maintained for pregnant women. The aim of this study was to describe access to and quality of obstetric care for pregnant and postpartum women during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify factors that predict quality of care at this time.Methods: Between May 3 and June 28, 2020, we recruited women who were pregnant or within the first 6 months after delivery to participate in an online survey. This included questions on access to obstetric healthcare (type and place of health care provider, changes to obstetric appointments/services, appointment preferences) and the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ).Results: Of the 917 eligible women, 612 (67%) were pregnant and 305 (33%) were in the first 6 months after delivery. Sixty-two percent (n = 571) reported that COVID-19 had affected their healthcare; appointments were rearranged, canceled or occurred via virtual means for 29% (n = 166), 29% (n = 167), and 31% (n = 175) of women, respectively. The majority preferred to physically attend appointments (74%; n = 676) and perceived the accompaniment of birth partners as important (77%; n = 471). Sixty-two percent (n = 380) were permitted a birth partner at delivery, 18% (n = 111) were unsure of the rules while 4% (n = 26) were not permitted accompaniment. During pregnancy, QPCQ was negatively associated with disruption to obstetric services including exclusion or uncertainty regarding birth partner permissions [F(7, 433) = 11.5, p &lt; 0.001, R2 = 0.16] while QPCQ was negatively associated with inadequate breastfeeding support postpartum [F(1, 147) = 12.05, p = 0.001, R2 = 0.08].Conclusion: Pregnant and postpartum have experienced disruption in their access to obstetric healthcare. Perceived quality of obstetric care was negatively influenced by cancellation of appointment(s), suspension of services and exclusion of birth partners at delivery. During this time, continuity of care can be fulfilled via virtual and/or phone appointments and women should receive clear guidance on changes to services including birth partner permissions to attend delivery.

scholarly journals Quality of Sleep and Quality of Life during Pregnancy

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-193
Author(s):  
Keun Tae Kim ◽  
Hyoeun Bae ◽  
Jin Gon Bae ◽  
Yong Won Cho
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Quality Of Sleep ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Sf 36

Background: The prevalence of sleep disorders increases as pregnancy progresses, which affects the health of pregnant women, fetal health, and the outcomes of pregnancy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of sleep and life in pregnant women in Korea.Methods: This study is a prospective cross-sectional, case-control study of pregnant women and age-matched controls. From July to September 2019, all participants completed Korean-language versions of the sleep questionnaires including Pittsburgh sleep quality index (K-PSQI), Insomnia severity index, Epworth sleepiness scale, Back’s depression inventory-2(K-BDI), STOP (Snoring, Tiredness, Observed apneas, and high blood Pressure), and short-form 36 (K-SF-36).Results: A total of 422 participants consisted of 385 pregnant women and 137 controls. Second and third trimester were 200 and 185, respectively. K-PSQI scores were higher in pregnant women compared with the controls (7.87±3.49 and 8.50±3.55 vs. 5.79±2.76, <i>p</i><0.001). Total score of K-SF-36 was lowest in third trimester (62.07±17.72) and highest in the control group(79.41±13.36). There was no statistical difference between groups in K-BDI.Conclusions: This study demonstrated worsening of sleep quality as well as life quality during pregnancy. More attention to sleep of pregnant women is needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document