Natal dispersal and recruitment of Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica in an urban habitat

Bird Study ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Peter G. Teglhøj
2009 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
pp. 1197-1205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Balbontín ◽  
Anders P. Møller ◽  
Ignacio G. Hermosell ◽  
Alfonso Marzal ◽  
Maribel Reviriego ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Scandolara ◽  
R. Lardelli ◽  
G. Sgarbi ◽  
M. Caprioli ◽  
R. Ambrosini ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 1176-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horacio de la Cueva ◽  
Robert W. Blake

Aerodynamic power equations predict optimal speeds at which birds ought to fly if they are to maximize time spent in the air on a given energy store (minimum power speed, Vmp), distance covered using a given amount of fuel (maximum range speed, Vmr), and rate of delivering food to the chicks in the nest (Vnest), or maximize the daily energy balance (VDBAL). With the aerodynamic model employed, these speeds are 5.3, 7.0, 7.9, and 8.9 m∙s−1, respectively, for the Barn Swallow, Hirundo rustica. A comparison of the predicted flight speed with both the mean and median flight speeds (8 m∙s−1 in both cases; n = 821) recorded with Doppler radar indicates that Barn Swallows fly at speeds not significantly different from Vnest. The true sample size was unknown, and realistic sample sizes are drawn with bootstrap procedures and compared with those given by the number of measurements (821); no significant differences were found. To test the model, energy requirements for growth, prey density, and time spent foraging were varied independently in a sensitivity analysis. Large but realistic changes in these three variables do not contradict the model and predict speeds within the range measured in the field.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e0129340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith A. Hobson ◽  
Kevin J. Kardynal ◽  
Steven L. Van Wilgenburg ◽  
Gretchen Albrecht ◽  
Antonio Salvadori ◽  
...  

Ardeola ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cosme López-Calderón ◽  
Sergio Magallanes ◽  
Alfonso Marzal ◽  
Javier Balbontín

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-245
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Campomizzi ◽  
Zoé M. Lebrun-Southcott ◽  
Kristyn Richardson

Shed-like structures are being built to provide Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica erythrogaster) nesting habitat in response to population declines. However, Barn Swallow use of these structures is unavailable in the literature. We conducted three manipulative experiments to test if adding conspecific cues (i.e., vocalizations and decoys) to newly-built structures affected prospecting visits by Barn Swallows (1) during pre-breeding, (2) during post-breeding, and (3) during or after broadcasts of vocalizations compared to before broadcasts. Additionally, we monitored nesting following pre- and post-breeding cues. We built one nesting structure with and one without conspecific cues at each of 10 study sites in southern Ontario, Canada where nesting habitat was recently lost. We detected about twice as many Barn Swallows immediately after conspecific broadcasts compared to before. We did not find substantial differences in abundance and interactions with new nesting structures for other comparisons involving conspecific cues. Following pre-breeding cues at 10 sites, six nests were built in three of 10 structures treated with conspecific cues, compared to five nests in four of 10 structures without cues. In the subsequent breeding season following post-breeding cues at eight sites, four nests were built in two of eight structures treated with conspecific cues, compared to four nests in three of eight structures without cues. Conspecific vocalizations appeared to increase prospecting behaviour, but not the number of nests, at new nesting structures. The paucity of nests on new structures suggests that building shed-like structures may not be an effective method of mitigating loss of nesting habitat.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document