A long-term evaluation of the stage of change approach and compensable injury outcomes – a cluster-randomised trial

Ergonomics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 628-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Rothmore ◽  
Paul Aylward ◽  
Jodi Gray ◽  
Jonathan Karnon
2018 ◽  
Vol 213 (2) ◽  
pp. 456-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M. Camacho ◽  
Linda M. Davies ◽  
Mark Hann ◽  
Nicola Small ◽  
Peter Bower ◽  
...  

BackgroundCollaborative care can support the treatment of depression in people with long-term conditions, but long-term benefits and costs are unknown.AimsTo explore the long-term (24-month) effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of collaborative care in people with mental-physical multimorbidity.MethodA cluster randomised trial compared collaborative care (integrated physical and mental healthcare) with usual care for depression alongside diabetes and/or coronary heart disease. Depression symptoms were measured by the symptom checklist-depression scale (SCL-D13). The economic evaluation was from the perspective of the English National Health Service.Results191 participants were allocated to collaborative care and 196 to usual care. At 24 months, the mean SCL-D13 score was 0.27 (95% CI, −0.48 to −0.06) lower in the collaborative care group alongside a gain of 0.14 (95% CI, 0.06-0.21) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The cost per QALY gained was £13 069.ConclusionsIn the long term, collaborative care reduces depression and is potentially cost-effective at internationally accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds.Declaration of interestNone.


PLoS Medicine ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. e224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Stephenson ◽  
Vicki Strange ◽  
Elizabeth Allen ◽  
Andrew Copas ◽  
Anne Johnson ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (643) ◽  
pp. e85-e91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caterina Vicens ◽  
Ermengol Sempere ◽  
Ferrán Bejarano ◽  
Isabel Socias ◽  
Catalina Mateu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. oemed-2020-106794
Author(s):  
Luise Moelenberg Begtrup ◽  
Per Malmros ◽  
Charlotte Brauer ◽  
Sandra Soegaard Toettenborg ◽  
Esben Meulengracht Flachs ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe aim was to test if targeting managers with an educational intervention reduces absence among pregnant employees.MethodsThe study was a non-blinded cluster randomised trial conducted in hospitals and daycare institutions from two administrative Danish Regions and two Danish municipalities. Clusters (work units) were assigned randomly and non-blinded to either (1) intervention, where all managers were invited to participate in a 3-hour seminar addressing needs and options for adjustment of work in pregnancy, or (2) control, with practice as usual. The primary outcome based on payroll data was long-term pregnancy-related absence, defined as ≥12.5% cumulated absence during pregnancy weeks 1–32. Intention-to-treat analysis was applied using mixed logistic regression.ResultsNinety work units were included (56 hospital departments and 34 daycare units) with 451 pregnant employees in the intervention group and 464 in the control group. Work units had on average 11 pregnant employees with no difference between the groups. 103 of the 216 invited managers (48%) participated in a the 3-hour seminar. In the intervention group, 154 (34%) had long-term pregnancy-related absence during pregnancy weeks 1–32 vs 166 (36%) in the control group. Relative odds of having long-term pregnancy-related absence, when being in the intervention group, was 1.06 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.58), with an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.07.ConclusionAn educational intervention targeting managers did not reduce pregnancy-related absence among pregnant employees.Trial registration numberNCT03002987.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document