Emergence of Joint Attention: Relationships Between Gaze Following, Social Referencing, Imitation, and Naming in Infancy

2003 ◽  
Vol 164 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Slaughter ◽  
Danielle McConnell
Keyword(s):  
Joint Attention ◽  
Social Referencing ◽  
Gaze Following

scholarly journals Reflexive gaze following in common marmoset monkeys

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Spadacenta ◽  
Peter W. Dicke ◽  
Peter Thier
Keyword(s):  
Joint Attention ◽  
World Monkey ◽  
Common Marmoset ◽  
Gaze Following ◽  
New World Monkeys ◽  
List Type ◽  
Old World Monkeys ◽  
Common Marmosets ◽  
Old World ◽  
Domain Specific

ABSTRACTThe ability to extract the direction of the other’s gaze allows us to shift our attention to an object of interest to the other and to establish joint attention. By mapping one’s own expectations, desires and intentions on the object of joint attention, humans develop a Theory of (the other’s) Mind (TOM), a functional sequence possibly disrupted in autism. Although old world monkeys probably do not possess a TOM, they follow the other’s gaze and they establish joint attention. Gaze following of both humans and old world monkeys fulfills Fodor’s criteria of a domain specific function and is orchestrated by very similar cortical architectures, strongly suggesting homology. Also new world monkeys, a primate suborder that split from the old world monkey line about 35 million years ago, have complex social structures. One member of this group, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus), has received increasing interest as a potential model in studies of normal and disturbed human social cognition. Marmosets are known to follow human head-gaze. However, the question is if they use gaze following to establish joint attention with conspecifics. Here we show that this is indeed the case. In a free choice task, head-restrained marmosets prefer objects gazed at by a conspecific and, moreover, they exhibit considerably shorter choice reaction times for the same objects. These findings support the assumption of an evolutionary old domain specific faculty shared within the primate order and they underline the potential value of marmosets in studies of normal and disturbed joint attention.HIGHLIGHTSCommon marmosets follow the head gaze of conspecifics in order to establish joint attention.Brief exposures to head gaze are sufficient to reallocate an animal’s attention.The tendency to follow the other’s gaze competes with the attractional binding of the conspecific’s face

scholarly journals Detecting communicative intent in a computerised test of joint attention

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Caruana ◽  
Genevieve McArthur ◽  
Alexandra Woolgar ◽  
Jon Brock
Keyword(s):  
Joint Attention ◽  
Search Task ◽  
Response Times ◽  
Eye Contact ◽  
Gaze Following ◽  
Visual Array ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Communicative Intent ◽  
Cognitive Faculties

The successful navigation of social interactions depends on a range of cognitive faculties – including the ability to achieve joint attention with others to share information and experiences. We investigated the influence that intention monitoring processes have on gaze-following response times during joint attention. We employed a virtual reality task in which 16 healthy adults engaged in a collaborative game with a virtual partner to locate a target in a visual array. In the Search task, the virtual partner was programmed to engage in non-communicative gaze shifts in search of the target, establish eye contact, and then display a communicative gaze shift to guide the participant to the target. In the NoSearch task, the virtual partner simply established eye contact and then made a single communicative gaze shift towards the target (i.e., there were no non-communicative gaze shifts in search of the target). Thus, only the Search task required participants to monitor their partner’s communicative intent before responding to joint attention bids. We found that gaze following was significantly slower in the Search task than the NoSearch task. However, the same effect on response times was not observed when participants completed non-social control versions of the Search and NoSearch tasks, in which the avatar’s gaze was replaced by arrow cues. These data demonstrate that the intention monitoring processes involved in differentiating communicative and non-communicative gaze shifts during the Search task had a measureable influence on subsequent joint attention behaviour. The empirical and methodological implications of these findings for the fields of autism and social neuroscience will be discussed.

scholarly journals The impact of joint attention on the sound-induced flash illusions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Battich ◽  
Isabelle Garzorz ◽  
Basil Wahn ◽  
Ophelia Deroy
Keyword(s):  
Joint Attention ◽  
Cognitive Processing ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Focus Of Attention ◽  
Audiovisual Integration ◽  
Gaze Following ◽  
Information Encoding ◽  
Single Flash ◽  
The Impact

AbstractHumans coordinate their focus of attention with others, either by gaze following or prior agreement. Though the effects of joint attention on perceptual and cognitive processing tend to be examined in purely visual environments, they should also show in multisensory settings. According to a prevalent hypothesis, joint attention enhances visual information encoding and processing, over and above individual attention. If two individuals jointly attend to the visual components of an audiovisual event, this should affect the weighing of visual information during multisensory integration. We tested this prediction in this preregistered study, using the well-documented sound-induced flash illusions, where the integration of an incongruent number of visual flashes and auditory beeps results in a single flash being seen as two (fission illusion) and two flashes as one (fusion illusion). Participants were asked to count flashes either alone or together, and expected to be less prone to both fission and fusion illusions when they jointly attended to the visual targets. However, illusions were as frequent when people attended to the flashes alone or with someone else, even though they responded faster during joint attention. Our results reveal the limitations of the theory that joint attention enhances visual processing as it does not affect temporal audiovisual integration.

scholarly journals Reflexive gaze following in common marmoset monkeys

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Spadacenta ◽  
Peter W. Dicke ◽  
Peter Thier
Keyword(s):  
Joint Attention ◽  
World Monkey ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Human Head ◽  
Common Marmoset ◽  
Gaze Following ◽  
New World Monkeys ◽  
Common Marmosets ◽  
Old World ◽  
Domain Specific

Abstract The ability to extract the direction of the other’s gaze allows us to shift our attention to an object of interest to the other and to establish joint attention. By mapping one’s own intentions on the object of joint attention, humans develop a Theory of (the other’s) Mind (TOM), a functional sequence possibly disrupted in autism. Gaze following of both humans and old world monkeys is orchestrated by very similar cortical architectures, strongly suggesting homology. Also new world monkeys, a primate suborder that split from the old world monkey line about 35 million years ago, have complex social structures and one member of this group, the common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) are known to follow human head-gaze. However, the question is if they use gaze following to establish joint attention with conspecifics. Here we show that this is indeed the case. In a free choice task, head-restrained marmosets prefer objects gazed at by a conspecific and, moreover, they exhibit considerably shorter choice reaction times for the same objects. These findings support the assumption of an evolutionarily old domain specific faculty shared within the primate order and they underline the potential value of marmosets in studies of normal and disturbed joint attention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document