The Effect of Refuting Misconceptions in the Introductory Psychology Class

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Kowalski ◽  
Annette Kujawski Taylor
1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Everett L. Worthington, Jr. ◽  
Josephine A. Welsh ◽  
C. Ray Archer ◽  
Erica J. Mindes ◽  
Donelson R. Forsyth

1979 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Rose Clance ◽  
Thomas V. Matthews ◽  
Joan Joesting

This study examined the effects of a psychology of adjustment class on body-acceptance and self-acceptance. An introductory psychology class served as a control group. Subjects were pre- and posttested with the Body-cathexis and Self-cathexis scales. Two by two analyses of covariance indicated that the adjustment group showed a larger gain on both scales than the control. Sex interacted with group significantly on the Body-cathexis scale only. Means indicated that the main effect of groups on the Body-cathexis scale may be attributed to the larger gains by females in the adjustment class.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey S. Nevid ◽  
Michael A. Ambrose ◽  
Yea Seul Pyun

Our study examined whether brief writing-to-learn assignments linked to lower and higher levels in Bloom’s taxonomy affected performance differentially on examination performance in assessing these skill levels. Using a quasi-random design, 91 undergraduate students in an introductory psychology class completed eight lower level and eight higher level writing assignments. We based both higher and lower level writing assignments on the same concepts drawn from chapters of the accompanying textbook but which differed in level of cognitive complexity. The results favored a top-down approach by showing that higher level writing assignments produced significantly better performance on both lower and higher level exam questions derived from concepts students had written about.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54
Author(s):  
Carolyn R. Brown-Kramer

How can instructors help students adopt effective learning strategies? In this study, students in a large introductory psychology class completed a “learning how to learn” assignment in which they read one of four randomly assigned empirical articles about the utility of a learning strategy (i.e., distributed practice, rereading, practice testing, or forming mental images) and wrote a paper summarizing, analyzing, and applying the article’s findings. Students relied significantly less on low-utility strategies and significantly more on moderate and high-utility strategies at the end of the semester than at the beginning. Furthermore, students who completed this assignment outperformed their peers in a control semester of the same course, improving by about one-third of a letter grade. Suggestions for effective implementation of a similar assignment are presented.


1988 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Griggs ◽  
Sherri L. Jackson

Controlling for possible confoundings in a recent study (Carstens & Beck, 1986), we found that completing a high school psychology class was not related to performance in a college introductory psychology course but a strong background in high school natural science was related to higher grades in the course, especially in the section dealing with topics closely related to natural science. An explanation in terms of the congruence of the scientific–experimental focus of the natural science courses and the college psychology course is suggested.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document