A student perspective: Ten key features of the future medical school–not an impossible dream

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 968-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahil Chandra ◽  
Anushri Dixit
Keyword(s):  
Medical School ◽  
Student Perspective ◽  
The Future ◽  
Key Features

Comment on: Ten key features of the future medical school – not an impossible dream

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 969-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Salata Romão ◽  
Lucélio Bernardes Couto ◽  
Marina Toledo Durand ◽  
Reinaldo Bulgarelli Bestetti
Keyword(s):  
Medical School ◽  
The Future ◽  
Key Features

The Resident in the Non-university Hospital

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1962 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 678-679
Author(s):  
H. William Fink
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Medical School ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Community Hospitals ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Pediatric Practice ◽  
The Future

I write with concern for the future of good community hospitals with qualified attending pediatricians and plenty of patient material but no residents. In the ever-increasing competition for residents, such hospitals are slowly being strangled by the more fortunate university hospitals with their access to medical students and interns. I fear that the ultimate consequences will be the downgrading of pediatric practice throughout the county in those areas where there is not a medical school.

scholarly journals The future of medical school courses in professional skills and perspectives

1998 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Makoul ◽  
R H Curry ◽  
D H Novack
Keyword(s):  
Medical School ◽  
Professional Skills ◽  
The Future

scholarly journals Our disputes, divisions and conflicts about foundation of the School of medicine in Belgrade

2006 ◽  
Vol 134 (Suppl. 2) ◽  
pp. 162-166
Author(s):  
Vukasin Antic ◽  
Zarko Vukovic
Keyword(s):  
Medical School ◽  
First World War ◽  
Medical Society ◽  
World War ◽  
School Of Medicine ◽  
The First World War ◽  
The Future ◽  
The University ◽  
First World

Disputes, divisions and even conflicts, so frequent in Serbia, have not bypassed physicians-members of the Serbian Medical Society; ones of the most important occurred at the crossroad of the 19th and 20th centuries related to foundation of the School of Medicine in Belgrade. The most prominent and persistent advocate of foundation of the School of Medicine was Dr. Milan Jovanovic Batut. In 1899, he presented the paper ?The Medical School of the Serbian University?. Batut`s effort was worth serious attention but did not produce fruit. On the contrary, Dr. Mihailo Petrovic criticized Batut by opening the discussion ?Is the Medical School in Serbia the most acute sanitary necessity or not?? in the Serbian Archives, in 1900. However, such an attitude led to intervention of Dr. Djoka Nikolic, who defended Batut`s views. He published his article in Janko Veselinovic`s magazine ?The Star?. Since then up to 1904, all discussions about Medical School had stopped. It was not even mentioned during the First Congress of Serbian Physicians and Scientists. Nevertheless, at the very end of the gathering, a professor from Prague, Dr. Jaromil Hvala claimed that ?the First Serbian Congress had prepared the material for the future Medical School?, thus sending a message to the attendants of what importance for Serbia its foundation would have been. But the President of both the Congress and the Serbian Medical Society, as well as the editor of the Serbian Archives, Dr. Jovan Danic announced that ?the First Congress of Serbian Physicians and Scientists had finished its work?. It was evident that Danic belonged to those medical circles which jealously guarded special privileges of doctors and other eminent persons who had very serious doctrinal disagreements on the foundation of the Medical School. All that seemed to have grown into clash, which finally resulted in the fact that Serbia got Higher Medical School within the University of Belgrade with a great delay, only after the First World War.

scholarly journals The Quality Lecture: How Do We Rate?

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 710-720
Author(s):  
Tzong-Yang Pan ◽  
Cathy Owen
Keyword(s):  
Staff Development ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Medical School ◽  
Tertiary Education ◽  
Primary Method ◽  
Visual Aids ◽  
Lecture Series ◽  
Key Concepts ◽  
Key Features

Aims: to review the key features of an effective lecture and to rate a series of medical school lectures to inform a broader initiative in staff development in effective lecturingBackground: Lectures are the primary method of delivering information to an audience in tertiary education and remain a key part of medical school educationMethod: Literature review confirmed fourteen elements thought to contribute to the quality of a lecture. A lecture series was then rated using these criteria Results: The three highest rated criteria were explaining and summarising key concepts, presenting material at an appropriate level to the audience, and the use of clear audio-visual aids and voice. The three lowest rated aspects of our lecture program were stating goals of the talk, monitoring audience understanding and responding appropriately, and providing a conclusion to the talk.Conclusions: These findings will provide direction to staff development to further improve the quality of lectures provided to students. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document