Metacognitive Realism: a cognitive style or a learning strategy?

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 101-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Véronique Jans ◽  
Dieudonné Leclercq
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-94
Author(s):  
Yayan Eryk Setiawan ◽  
Purwanto Purwanto ◽  
I Nengah Parta ◽  
Sisworo Sisworo

Linear pattern is the primary material in learning number patterns in junior high schools, but there are still many students who fail to generalize the linear pattern. The students’ failure in generalizing the pattern occurred when the students ended to view the problems globally without breaking them into the constructors’ components such as the experience of field-dependent type students. For this reason, this study was carried out to explore the thinking process of students who fail and investigate the thinking processes of students who succeed in generalizing linear patterns. The results of this study provide an effective learning strategy solution for field-dependent students in generalizing linear patterns. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design to junior high school students. The results indicated that students in the field-dependent cognitive style looked at pattern questions represented in the form of geometric images globally without looking at the structure of the image. Two strategies for generalizing linear patterns used by field-dependent students were examined, namely recursive and different strategies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 791-808
Author(s):  
Arif Sholahuddin ◽  
◽  
Eko Susilowati ◽  
Binar Kurnia Prahani ◽  
Erman Erman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (S3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tata Tambi ◽  
Fathiaty Murtadho ◽  
Zainal Rafli

In the class, most of the teacher use a single teaching strategy to students who have different cognitive styles when teaching narrative essays in the class. Therefore, it is necessary to improve teaching strategies in the teaching and learning process. The teaching strategies that fit with the cognitive style of students in order that the learning objective is improved. This paper investigates the effect of learning strategy and cognitive style on student’s narrative writing ability. This study was conducted on the VII grade students at Madrasah Tsanawiyah Ibnu Taimiyah Bogor, West Java. Treatment by level design and two-factorial ANOVA analysis with ? = 0.05 were applied in this experimental study. The sample was 40 students grouped into experiment classes and 40 students was grouped into control classes. There was a different ability in narrative writing in Bahasa Indonesia between students having field independent cognitive style (A1) and students having field dependent cognitive style (A2).  Results of two-way interrow analysis of variance showed that Fcalculated (4.123) was higher than Ftable (3.97) at a significant level  of ? = 0.05.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-301
Author(s):  
Arif SHOLAHUDDIN ◽  
Leny YUANITA ◽  
Z. A. Imam SUPARDI ◽  
Binar Kurnia PRAHANI

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-69
Author(s):  
Tata Tambi ◽  
Fathiaty Murtadho ◽  
Zainal Rafli

In the class, most of the teacher use a single teaching strategy to students who have different cognitive styles when teaching narrative essays in the class. Therefore, it is necessary to improve teaching strategies in the teaching and learning process. The teaching strategies that fit with the cognitive style of students in order that the learning objective is improved. This paper investigates the effect of learning strategy and cognitive style on student’s narrative writing ability. This study was conducted on the VII grade students at Madrasah Tsanawiyah Ibnu Taimiyah Bogor, West Java. Treatment by level design and two-factorial ANOVA analysis with α = 0.05 were applied in this experimental study. The sample was 40 students grouped into experiment classes and 40 students was grouped into control classes. There was a different ability in narrative writing in Bahasa Indonesia between students having field independent cognitive style (A1) and students having field dependent cognitive style (A2). Results of two-way interrow analysis of variance showed that Fcalculated (4.123) was higher than Ftable (3.97) at a significant level of α = 0.05. The findings showed the ability to write a narrative writing in Bahasa Indonesia of students having a field independent cognitive style was higher than that of students having a field dependent cognitive style.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document